As for the airport, whose to say my crappy theory isn't better than any of the other crappy theories? Why is your crappy theory that you pigeon hole around your Revelation's inkblot beliefs any different than my pigeon holing it based that it was built during the cold war and could possibly have been funded by pro-democracy anti-communist who asked the artist to convey a certain political message--but I can't be certain (nor be bothered tocare that much) because i don't have god on my side.
Debate can bring out the truths and falsehoods, so it is good you replied.
Just remember logic is one of my super strong suites, so be prepared.
Did you consider that a gutter and drain of any form also accomplishes the same function. So obviously the main distinction of the Gargoyles is not the water draining function, but rather the evil that it depicts. Of course if I did a Google search, I already reviewed all the arguments about Gargoyles. The other one being that they were thought to scare off evil spirits, but that wouldn't make any sense either because evil spirits would obviously not be fooled by a inanimate statue. So the only rational explanation for the existence of evil depictions on the outside of churches (afaik mainly in Europe), is as I explained in my prior post that these were used to remind the church goers of the evil that lay outside the church and also as a form of idols (symbolism) for those too unstudied to appreciate the lessons of the Bible in earnest. One of the 10 Commandments is do not have idols (the Europeans have idolized their social system, the power of the European man and system to create more peace than the savage beasts of the USA, etc). The Gargoyle in the Denver airport is apparently not functional as a water drain.
So again to distill it for you, the logic is that the only unique purpose for which you would use an elaborately sculpted (and thus more costly) depiction of evil instead of a normal gutter or abbreviated aqueduct (as I assume the Romans did), is because there was some marketing purpose.
As for the theory of the purpose of some of the Denver airport murals (and some other eccentric features), again you seem to not have grasped the logic I stated. The murals depict all human races/cultures (go look again!) and countries of the world undergoing war, death, and destruction. So this obviously not something specific to Russia. We don't need any theory whatsoever. We just need to open our eyes.
As for whether those murals correspond to anything in the Bible, I don't think that was my point at all. My point and theory was the powers-that-be that run this world are being boastful about their plans for the near future. It can also serve as a forbearing so the elite can take he high ground of having warned humanity of their impending doom if they did not change their habits. So we won't have to wait long to test my theory. My common sense logic is who would have the motivation to fund and produce such exorbitant displays of evil? They aren't in a place in the mass media where they can be used to indoctrinate the masses, thus their purpose can only be hubris (or insanity). Somehow you conflated my latter posts wherein I wrote about Biblical parables, and seems you've also conflated that I am a christian when in fact I wrote that anyone who assumes I am a devout christian would probably be wrong.
You are just all over the place with conflation and illogic. You may be a good poet, but you do not apparently have the logic skills to be a good programmer.
Edit: you claim you have no adverse reaction to those people who express any words about Biblical parables, even if reviewing them for the truth they might espouse independent of any claim that a God exists (and even what God would entail, i.e. some people might only claim that God is the Universe as natural). Yet I see you ridiculing and conflating when ever you see any such words. It as if your primitive, post-paleozoic, hunter-gatherer emotions overtake your pre-frontal cerebral cortex.