Topic: Evolution is a hoax (Read 108057 times)
Devolution.
. Why BADecker doesn't cuck on this subject is a curious phenomenon. What's your major malfunction BADecker?
The fact that evolution is a hoax (in some circles) doesn't have anything to do with what BADecker is or does.
Why BADecker doesn't cuck on this subject is a curious phenomenon. What's your major malfunction BADecker?
I had to read this four times and I still could not get to understand it 
Time for me to get some coffee then try to refocus on this post...
Time for me to get some coffee then try to refocus on this post...
Random is a misnomer.
"The term random [variable] is a misnomer, because a random variable is neither random, nor is it a variable. A random variable X is a function from the sample space Ω to real field R. The term 'random' actually signifies the underlying 'randomness' in picking an element ω from the sample space Ω." -- https://nptel.ac.in/content/storage2/courses/108106083/lecture11_rvs.pdf
"The term random [variable] is a misnomer, because a random variable is neither random, nor is it a variable. A random variable X is a function from the sample space Ω to real field R. The term 'random' actually signifies the underlying 'randomness' in picking an element ω from the sample space Ω." -- https://nptel.ac.in/content/storage2/courses/108106083/lecture11_rvs.pdf
Random is a misnomer.
"The term random [variable] is a misnomer, because a random variable is neither random, nor is it a variable. A random variable X is a function from the sample space Ω to real field R. The term 'random' actually signifies the underlying 'randomness' in picking an element ω from the sample space Ω." -- https://nptel.ac.in/content/storage2/courses/108106083/lecture11_rvs.pdf
https://i.imgur.com/NRIhLOY.jpg
"The term random [variable] is a misnomer, because a random variable is neither random, nor is it a variable. A random variable X is a function from the sample space Ω to real field R. The term 'random' actually signifies the underlying 'randomness' in picking an element ω from the sample space Ω." -- https://nptel.ac.in/content/storage2/courses/108106083/lecture11_rvs.pdf
https://i.imgur.com/NRIhLOY.jpg
Random is an attempt that people have made to determine things that they don't know or don't understand. Cause and effect in everything eliminates random. This is one of the points that I have been trying to make regarding evolution all along.
Since you didn't mention evolution, is that what you mean? Or were you thinking of something else? Or was it an entirely off-topic post you made?
Random is a misnomer.
"The term random [variable] is a misnomer, because a random variable is neither random, nor is it a variable. A random variable X is a function from the sample space Ω to real field R. The term 'random' actually signifies the underlying 'randomness' in picking an element ω from the sample space Ω." -- https://nptel.ac.in/content/storage2/courses/108106083/lecture11_rvs.pdf
"The term random [variable] is a misnomer, because a random variable is neither random, nor is it a variable. A random variable X is a function from the sample space Ω to real field R. The term 'random' actually signifies the underlying 'randomness' in picking an element ω from the sample space Ω." -- https://nptel.ac.in/content/storage2/courses/108106083/lecture11_rvs.pdf
^^^ The answer is that there isn't any evolution that we know of. Evolution theory proves that people don't know that there was evolution. How? By saying that there were/are random mutations. What do random mutations have to do with it? Here's what.
There are only two kinds of random:
1. Pure random, which has never been proven to exist, and doesn't even fit with the universe;
2. Random because of the lack of the ability of the people to track things, and gain knowledge thereby.
Since we have never proven that pure random exists, and since it doesn't fit with the way the universe works, pure random is at best an unknown. As an unknown, it really falls into #2 above.
Number 2 simply says that people don't know because they can't track it.
In other words, evolution theory destroys the evolution idea that it is said to promote. People simply don't know that evolution exists because they can't track what is random in so-called evolution, and random in evolution theory proves they acknowledge that they don't know.
Since evolution people who understand about random keep on promoting evolution as a reality, they are perpetrating a hoax.
Evolution is a hoax.
There are only two kinds of random:
1. Pure random, which has never been proven to exist, and doesn't even fit with the universe;
2. Random because of the lack of the ability of the people to track things, and gain knowledge thereby.
Since we have never proven that pure random exists, and since it doesn't fit with the way the universe works, pure random is at best an unknown. As an unknown, it really falls into #2 above.
Number 2 simply says that people don't know because they can't track it.
In other words, evolution theory destroys the evolution idea that it is said to promote. People simply don't know that evolution exists because they can't track what is random in so-called evolution, and random in evolution theory proves they acknowledge that they don't know.
Since evolution people who understand about random keep on promoting evolution as a reality, they are perpetrating a hoax.
Evolution is a hoax.
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
Keeping the (lack) of video aside, I know the OP was last active in September 2017 but I just wanted to add a reply to the actual question with a counter-question...
Why indeed?
The video has been deleted. I was curious to see if the OP was being sarcastic with the why are monkey's still around. Because if not then he has a very inaccurate understanding of what evolution is.
Evolution is simply a science fiction story. All the evidence that is suggested for evolution, fits simple change, adaptation, and like begets like, better than it could fit evolution.
There is no evidence that conclusively proves evolution as said in evolution theory. But there is lots of evidence that conclusively proves evolution to be false.
Evolution is a hoax being played against people by those in the know.
There is no evidence that conclusively proves evolution as said in evolution theory. But there is lots of evidence that conclusively proves evolution to be false.
Evolution is a hoax being played against people by those in the know.
Plenty and plenty of evidence to back it up, hence why it's been the overwhelmingly accepted unifying theory of biology for a century.
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
We and monkeys come from the same ancestors , the difference is that our ancestors took the faith jamp to get out of trees , walk on two limbs to reach food on trees and search food on land. Soon they started moving in groups , developed ways to communicate and also made toolsnto chip stones and hunt wild animals on land. While the ancestors of monkeys were still on tress , living life , jumping from one tree to other in search of food.
Evolution is not fake, the simple answer is evolution takes time, yeah when i say time i mean a lot of time were talking about thousands of years even millions of years for a specie to evolve. In science class these things has been taught to us that chickens came from their ancestors called dinosaurs, some reptiles were once fish and was able to walk in lands through various process of evolution.
But that^^ and that^^ are fiction, and sometimes science fiction. Why? Because the evidence for evolution fits proven things like simple change, adaptation, and like-begets-like, way better than it fits the evolution silliness. No proof for evolution.
Since many scientists know that evolution is not real, and yet they say that evolution is real, evolution is a hoax being perpetrated by these scientists.
Evolution is a hoax.
Evolution is not fake, the simple answer is evolution takes time, yeah when i say time i mean a lot of time were talking about thousands of years even millions of years for a specie to evolve. In science class these things has been taught to us that chickens came from their ancestors called dinosaurs, some reptiles were once fish and was able to walk in lands through various process of evolution.
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE
We and monkeys come from the same ancestors , the difference is that our ancestors took the faith jamp to get out of trees , walk on two limbs to reach food on trees and search food on land. Soon they started moving in groups , developed ways to communicate and also made toolsnto chip stones and hunt wild animals on land. While the ancestors of monkeys were still on tress , living life , jumping from one tree to other in search of food.
But this thread is about the evolution religion. Since there is no proof for evolution...
Evolution is a hoax, and it has become a religion for many.
A hoax?
No that is not the right word.
Evolution is not a hoax it is a myth.
The Funeral of a Great Myth
(of Popular Evolution)
by C.S. Lewis
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCWGyWCLTo
Right. Evolution is only a hoax when someone who knows that evolution is a myth, presents it as reality.
But this thread is about the evolution religion. Since there is no proof for evolution...
Evolution is a hoax, and it has become a religion for many.
A hoax?
No that is not the right word.
Evolution as it is commonly popularized is not a hoax it is a modern creation myth.
There is some science there but the science is overwhelmed by the myth.
The Funeral of a Great Myth
(of Popular Evolution)
by C.S. Lewis
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCWGyWCLTo
On the other hand. Magic man in the sky saying hocus pocus and pops everything into existence is a much better explanation....
So, now you want to talk about a magician in the sky. Is this where you think evolution came from? How in the world silly are you?
Because of the religion who believes us from the past into the present, we do believe also by the book they've created. We or they believe that Magician from sky was true because no one even scientist can prove on how and where do we came from.
But this thread is about the evolution religion. Since there is no proof for evolution...
Evolution is a hoax, and it has become a religion for many.
On the other hand. Magic man in the sky saying hocus pocus and pops everything into existence is a much better explanation....
So, now you want to talk about a magician in the sky. Is this where you think evolution came from? How in the world silly are you?
Because of the religion who believes us from the past into the present, we do believe also by the book they've created. We or they believe that Magician from sky was true because no one even scientist can prove on how and where do we came from.
On the other hand. Magic man in the sky saying hocus pocus and pops everything into existence is a much better explanation....
So, now you want to talk about a magician in the sky. Is this where you think evolution came from? How in the world silly are you?
Jump to: