Here is possibly the biggest point that shows that evolution theory evolution (ETE) is not possible. It is cause and effect (C&E).
Consider billiards, pool. When a pool player taps the cue ball, the results happen according to how he taps it. If all the forces were to act exactly the same way every time he tapped the cue ball, the ball would move exactly the same way every time.
It's the same with all science. When you perform a scientific experiment the same way every time, you get exactly the same results every time.
Why is this important for evolution? Because every force in the universe was set to act exactly the way it has acted, right from the beginning of the universe. This means that all of nature has been programmed to act exactly as it acts. If some little thing had been started differently at the beginning, then there would be a different result right now.
ETE talks about random mutation. But C&E shows that there is no random. All there is, is, complexity way beyond anything we can begin to observe. That's why we call complex happenings random. It's our weakness of observation. But in reality there is no random.
The point is, whatever set the universe up the way it is, programmed life and everything else to be exactly the way it is. This means that evolution theory is way off point, and that nobody will ever be able to find any ETE. They can't, because there is absolutely no random, of mutation or anything else.
Even the thing that feels like and looks like our free will, is really artificial free will, because it has all been programmed in from the beginning. At least, that's is what science has shown so far. Some day we might find something that doesn't operate by C&E. As things now stand, non-C&E doesn't even make sense in the universe.
There is no case, no experiment, no event, which has ever been conducted 100% the same way in all the history of the universe. No “input” has ever been the same, thus no “output” has ever been the same. All other things being equal, time has always passed, thus input, any input, is never really 100% the same. What you have “proven”, is that C&E can’t really be proven, not that Evolution cannot exist because no pure randomness exist, on account of C&E.
If you want to get down to this nitty-gritty point, then finish it. There are factually so many adaptation/like-begets-like/simple-change, provable happenings, without even one proof of ETE, that evolution is scientifically impossible simply by scientific probability.