Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 46. (Read 108057 times)

The rebuttals of my rebuttals rebut themselves by assuming all kinds of assumptions like evolution is a hoax when such is not proven.

Your rebuttals rebut themselves by making all kinds of assumptions that evolution is factual, when such has not been proven.

Evolution is a hoax.

I can google why evolution is real and find all kinds of proof why it is. I can also google rebuttals to all the supposed proof for why evolution is impossible.

Google "evolution is impossible" to find all kinds of proof that evolution is impossible.

Evolution is a hoax.

Let me give you an example of proof. A mare has a colt. There is all kinds of proof that there is something going on in nature.

The thing that needs proving is what, if any of it, is evolution.

We all see all kinds of proof in nature. Now show that any of it is proof for evolution, by proving even one instance of evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.

Why would you bump this thread?

You already know the response you will get from the town fool, right?

BADLogic: "You are stupid and wrong.  Science proves that evolution is fake (no evidence given or sources cited)   #SmileyGirl "

''nobody has offered real proof that evolution exists.'' You keep saying that but a scientific theory cannot exist without proof, why would those 30-40% of scientists that believe in god accept evolution then?

Even if your "statistics" are accurate, nobody has offered real proof that evolution exists. All of it, 100% of it, is based on the possibility that nature fits the evolution idea.

Most college-graduate, thinking scientists of our day have gone through some evolution courses. If evolution isn't their field, they agree with it only because they were required to take the classes. They haven't evaluated the other options - adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change... to say nothing about deeply considering C&E programming. So, there is nothing strange about the way they support evolution... almost absent mindedly.

Actually, I don't believe God clearly has scientific proof for His existence. I know it. The simplest proof is machine nature. Why would I believe when there is proof? Machines have makers.

Evolution is a hoax.

Well the fact is that most scientists, even the ones that believe in god agree that evolution is real. If they thought scientific proof for god existed, they would have came up with a scientific theory for god already since 30% of scientists in america believe in it. It's quite strange how they support evolution theory but make no effort to create even a hypothesis for the existence of god. Yet at the same time you believe evolution is clearly fake and god clearly has scientific evidence to prove his existence. Really strange..

In that other thread... you forgot the part about all your refutation refuting itself.

IF we were scientifically ignorant enough that we didn't have proof for God's existence, the best we could say is that we don't know where things came from. Why? Because we don't know enough about how things work, or what the history of the earth really is, to factually say that we know that evolution exists. The best that evolution can do is to suggest itself. All evolution things fit other events better than they fit evolution. And to top it all off, we have not even one proof of evolution. All we have is talk that there is proof.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

Evolution is truly a hoax because everything indicate that there is a creator of the universe and for that nothing came on it own.

Of course if you believe that you live on a spinning ball flying through space with ridiculous speeds. 

Could not be more obvious...




bonus image

The insurmountable flaws in the theory of Evolution which were recognized at the time of writing persist to the present time, so in that regard this book can still be relevant and informative.

If evolution scientists were humble and honest, they would get up and say, "We don't know." Because they don't do this, they are simply making another religion. This one they call "evolution."

Science likes facts. The fact for evolution is that, at best, nobody knows... at worst, it is impossible.

Evolution is a hoax.

The education system in your country has failed you.  You clearly do not know a single thing about evolution.

Just continue your Bible study and don't reproduce, please.

All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.



Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:

1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.

2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.

3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.

Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.



All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."



The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.

Evolution is a complete hoax.