All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.
Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:
1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.
2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.
3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.
Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.
All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."
The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.
Evolution is a complete hoax.
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.
Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:
1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.
2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.
3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.
Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.
All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."
The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.
Evolution is a complete hoax.
No they don’t, they (thinking scholars) understand that Evolution exists, is a fact, and a trillion species/individuals exists right now that proves it. But I do like you using “like-begets-like”, because it is exactly what evolution is. I just use the word Evolution instead.
Still find it interesting how, once in a while, a fetus “adapts” to produce 6 fingers on a hand or a third leg. More interesting it is maybe, that these are things you can see and it does happen; imagine how many smaller changes take place that you are unaware of and can’t see. Hmmmm…. its all adaptation, design and nothing random. Narrr almost hoaxed me there
I’m taking door number two, says Evolution over the frame of it.Most religious people accept evolution, he knows it, the fucking pope knows it and even said it many times, even older popes said evolution was real. If god was real he would be wondering how did he fuck up so hard that his followers can't accept basic logic.
I want to thank you for this. It justifies everything that I say. Evolution is a religion. Like many of the other religions of the world, there is nothing to evolution.
So, let's get to the religion that has truth and proof behind it... Christianity. We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.
So, thanks again for helping me show that...
Evolution is a hoax.
