Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 75. (Read 108165 times)

Ignoring my last post I see. No one has claimed that evolution theory is perfect, in fact I said many times is simply the best we have right now, science works that way, it evolves in a sense, heh. If it turns out that we were wrong about some things, science simply discards them and makes a new theory, until then, evolution theory still prevails.

Hey there, finally I can get back to you. I didn't say that the bible originated from the Torah, but that some parts of it did. I'm not knowledgeable enough to judge which scripture came first, so I'm not gonna.

You said something to the effect of "editing the bible is forbidden". I find that interesting, as I'm sure you're aware that the bible itself, in its over 2000 years of existence, has been abundantly edited? And how could it not? Simply translating text from one language to another requires stylistic decisions and interpretation by the translator. For example, when the Torah was translated from Hebrew to Greek in 250 BC; or compare different bible versions - there's over a hundred different versions in English alone which deviate from each other in different aspects. If this is not editing, what is?

And this doesn't even touch on the elephant in the room - the fact that the very books of the bible haven been selected by clergymen. Over many centuries parts of the bible have been added or taken out. That's why today the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox versions differ significantly from each other and from the Septuaginta, the original Greek bible (or rather the old testament).

I'm not sure if you're trolling with the "muslims invented evolution"-bit. I'm sure devout muslims hate the thought of evolution just as much as you do

We're beginning to see that science doesn't really know what they are talking about, including evolution scientists.

This Is The First Detailed Footage of DNA Replication, And It Wasn't What We Expected







Video Imaging of DNA Replication

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sne1uO6RxLE


Read more at https://www.sciencealert.com/dna-replication-first-footage-unexpected.

3 Oct 2012 - A girl battling cancer has been fitted with metal bones which will grow as she does. Lily Willis, 8, from Great Lumley, County Durham, was diagnosed with a bone cancer tumour called osteosarcoma in February after she came home from school limping just weeks earlier. The tumour, on her right leg, meant ...
Bionic Girl! Brave Lily Has 'Growing' Metal Bones To Replace Those ...
www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/.../bionic-girl-brave-lily-has-growing-metal-bones-to-repla...

Titanium foam builds Wolverine bones | New Scientist
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19493-titanium-foam-builds-wolverine-bones/
23 Sep 2010 - Advertisement. What's more, the foam is porous, so the bone can grow around and within it, truly integrating the implant with the skeleton. The titanium foam is made by saturating polyurethane foam with a solution of titanium powder and binding agents. The titanium clings to the polyurethane matrix, which .

EVERY DAY EVOLVES 

WE EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS 

What is your common ancestor ?  so if you had no gran parents would you be here today?
Now imagine your cousins and they carry on having children eventually you split apart from your original
gran parents so those become your common ancestors BUT you wouldn't evolved to have so many children from your original gran parents if they never give birth to your parents ..

Like this..
s - YouTube
Video for salamander evolution in action▶ 3:17
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjcFSy1KCTI
17 Sep 2007 - Uploaded by phoenixshade3

Now if you watch the video i will prove how we evolved from monkeys ..

Imagine a monkey had a child and just like the salamander who went around the mountain
If that monkey never had that child then the next monkey wouldn't of travelled anywhere because they be no monkeys ..

The Monkey done the same as a salamander ..
Now are you telling me your great gran parents you never evolved from them?
Did your cousins evolve from you ? NO they evolved from the same gran parents as you BUT as time goes on you will split in one direction from your cousins you go 1 way and they go another..

Now why humans haven't evolved into another form is because we evolved to use TECHNOLOGY
to benefit us to stay alive ..

Now what if we become half machine half human ?..
How do you know we might evolve into growing metal bones the fact is we don't know YET because we are still evolving ..

Now if you look humans already wanting to mix human flesh with metal and technology implanted
into our bodies ..

Maybe at birth your mother might TWEEK you up a bit ?..
Bionic legs eye who knows but all to make you live longer and be stronger and smarter and faster..

SO WE EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS  ..

The fact we could of evolved from many things before the monkey is yet to be discovered ..
BUT all excellent because it makes our planet way way smarter by the fact we LEARN about our earth
and our UNIVERSE ..

If the salamander never had a child to travel then how did a new type of salamander get around the mountain ?..

So did the new salamander who travelled around the mountain evolve from the old one?

Everyday evolves into a new one

97.3% of Biological Sciences department heads accept there is no scientific controversy over evolution.[2]
Only 700 out of 480,000 earth and life scientists (0.14%) subscribe to literal biblical creationism.[3]
Acceptance of evolution tends to increase with level of education.[4][5]
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution

Few religious bodies have formal statements on their position, though many do support the idea that evolution is correct (or at least "correct enough") and should be taught in schools. This is the position taken by many mainline Protestant churches (many of which signed on to the Clergy Letter Project) and some Muslim groups.

Theistic evolution is the accepted official position of the Roman Catholic Church

In 1986, an amicus curiae brief, signed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, asked the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard, to reject a Louisiana state law requiring that where evolutionary science was taught in public schools, creation science must also be taught.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest general scientific society with more than 130,000 members and over 262 affiliated societies and academies of science including over 10 million individuals, has made several statements and issued several press releases in support of evolution.


Do your own research, you can start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Google is your friend.

One can theorize all day long. But if the theory has no practical evidence or factual proof, that theory is only good for "evolving" additional ideas.

Show a real, factual proof that evolution exists. All the evidence can be interpreted as adaptation that does not agree with evolution theory.

There isn't even one practical evolution fact that doesn't fit something else better.

Evolution is a hoax. Because it is a hoax, for those who believe it to be true, it is a religion. It will remain a religion until it is proven, or until it is understood to be the hoax that it is.

If you are going to put religion into Science, God has no place on it. If you are going to put Science on Religion, morality will contradict the theories of Science. Therefore, it is a big mistake if you are going to see the perspective of evolution by understanding it using religion and it will be hoax. If you will see it on scientific way, you will be seeing the real answers behind the theories of the scientist.

What in the world do you mean by "the whole scientific community?" If you literally mean the whole scientific community, you are completely and grossly mistaken.

Evolution is a hoax.

Certainly the talk of evolution has been proven. After all, you can find books and Internet sites and scientific papers all over the place.

The thing that you can't find is even one single proof for actual evolution itself. All the past, supposed proofs have been shown to not be proofs, one way or another. All the present evidences have been shown to possibly be something else.

The closest that there is to proof for evolution is when evolution is equated with simple change or adaptation. So, why use the word "evolution" rather than the word "change" or the word "adaptation?" After all, evolution theory doesn't match these evidences as evolution.

If there were some standing proof for evolution, somebody could list it. Since it can't be listed, evolution in the theory sense is just hopes and dreams and a lot of talk.

Evolution is a hoax.



BTW, if somebody found something that was reasonable evidence for evolution, at this stage of the game, because of all the past failures, this one could not be proof... at least not right away. The past has shown us that this one would, with great probability, be proven to NOT be evolution, just as all the rest have.

It has been proven so much that even religious folks accept it. The whole scientific community views it as a fact as well.

This is so ridiculous, we didn't evolve from monkey... Nowaday monkeys and us evolved from a common ancestor which disappeared since then. Evolution is the only theory that actually makes some sense. It might be proven wrong one day and I am sure that scientists will recongnize another truth

You're close. Evolution talk is a fact. But evolution has never been proven.

Evolution is a hoax.

Evolution is a fact buddy, do you have evidence against it?

Thanks for reminding us that evolutionists have been proving and are now in the process of proving that evolution is a hoax, by not finding any proof for evolution in countless man hours of thought about evolution and examination of natural and scientific processes over a couple hundred years and really, over thousands of years.

So, thanks again for reminding us that evolution is a hoax.

Wrong thread buddy, this one is about proving evolution is a hoax which you still haven't, we are still waiting for your evidence.

Hawking talks about no clear Big Bang and no boundary to space-time







EXCLUSIVE: Stephen Hawking on What Existed Before the Big Bang

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ88kC2Nx8M


Read more at https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/03/hawking-talks-about-no-clear-big-bang-and-no-boundary-to-space-time.html.

Big bang is far too incomplete to account for something as complex as life. Rather, BB is a fun science fiction story about how a universe of certain kinds might have come about.

Even if BB were proven possible, scientists would have an almost infinitely long way to go to prove that it was the way our universe was started. BB hopes that things like evolution can fill in the gaps of understanding that BB theory has. But so far, evolution doesn't have any proof at all.

What else did you have in mind?

Why everyone there talking only about apes and this theory of evolution??? We have a lot of different other thoughts about it. Big bang and other stuff.

Until you can prove that evolution exists in fact...

Evolution is a hoax.