Pages:
Author

Topic: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [1st Feb 2016] - page 20. (Read 131506 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
I think they should get a 1 for Communication and 1 (preferably 0) for Ethics.

They have fucked up again and again, resulting in repeated delays and miners regularly going up in flames (both power supplies and hash boards). They disappear for weeks on end (they're in disappear mode right now), then come back with some bullshit about how they're working on a fix. They know all their X3 hash boards are defective, but make you ship the defective boards back to them to get replacements - at your own expense, naturally - apparently even going so far as to insist that you pay the customs fees for doing so.

In short, their communications have been nothing but lies and blaming everyone but themselves (including customers) for their problems. Their ethics are abominable - they've broken every promise they ever made: delivery schedule, refunds, price-matching, etc. Most recently their master customer service representative Alexey A. threatened that they could ship in 4 years and still be within their contractual rights.

They've promised a measly 50% extra hashing power for compensation, but say they can't ship any compensation units until they've completed the initial shipping queue. But both shipping queues are on hold because the current X3 design is defective and they've probably run out of parts for the X1. Instead, they say they're going to upgrade that one to the X1.5, with 150 GH, which will probably involve putting two under-spec chips on a board instead of their single-chip design. This will require reingineering, of course, which they will doubtless fuck up as well.

At this point, the only difference between BFL and BA is that BFL has been shut down. If BA's legal status weren't so obfuscated, I'm sure they would have been as well.

Agreed. I have no idea how dogie feels 5/10 for ethics and 4/10 for communication is reasonable.

BA makes BFL look like an honest company.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
yet BA's rank is lower than BFL's.. how's that even possible??
sr. member
Activity: 459
Merit: 250
I think they should get a 1 for Communication and 1 (preferably 0) for Ethics.

They have fucked up again and again, resulting in repeated delays and miners regularly going up in flames (both power supplies and hash boards). They disappear for weeks on end (they're in disappear mode right now), then come back with some bullshit about how they're working on a fix. They know all their X3 hash boards are defective, but make you ship the defective boards back to them to get replacements - at your own expense, naturally - apparently even going so far as to insist that you pay the customs fees for doing so.

In short, their communications have been nothing but lies and blaming everyone but themselves (including customers) for their problems. Their ethics are abominable - they've broken every promise they ever made: delivery schedule, refunds, price-matching, etc. Most recently their master customer service representative Alexey A. threatened that they could ship in 4 years and still be within their contractual rights.

They've promised a measly 50% extra hashing power for compensation, but say they can't ship any compensation units until they've completed the initial shipping queue. But both shipping queues are on hold because the current X3 design is defective and they've probably run out of parts for the X1. Instead, they say they're going to upgrade that one to the X1.5, with 150 GH, which will probably involve putting two under-spec chips on a board instead of their single-chip design. This will require reingineering, of course, which they will doubtless fuck up as well.

At this point, the only difference between BFL and BA is that BFL has been shut down. If BA's legal status weren't so obfuscated, I'm sure they would have been as well.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
Dogie, please look at BlackArrow's thread started by  Theymos.  There is now evidence that they have been mining on customer equipment with GPK's recent post.  Please add to original thread once reviewed.

I had a look what you posted and there is absolutely zero evidence of what you're claiming.

How so?  GPK has a board that he claims he never plugged in, but it has burn marks on the board?  How could those have gotten there without being run?

Because one board being previously plugged in does not constitute evidence that they have been mining on customer hardware for months on end. It just means their QC is bad.
sr. member
Activity: 459
Merit: 250
Dogie, please look at BlackArrow's thread started by  Theymos.  There is now evidence that they have been mining on customer equipment with GPK's recent post.  Please add to original thread once reviewed.

I had a look what you posted and there is absolutely zero evidence of what you're claiming.

How so?  GPK has a board that he claims he never plugged in, but it has burn marks on the board?  How could those have gotten there without being run?
Burn-in testing. Duh.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Dogie, please look at BlackArrow's thread started by  Theymos.  There is now evidence that they have been mining on customer equipment with GPK's recent post.  Please add to original thread once reviewed.

I had a look what you posted and there is absolutely zero evidence of what you're claiming.

How so?  GPK has a board that he claims he never plugged in, but it has burn marks on the board?  How could those have gotten there without being run?
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
Dogie, please look at BlackArrow's thread started by  Theymos.  There is now evidence that they have been mining on customer equipment with GPK's recent post.  Please add to original thread once reviewed.

I had a look what you posted and there is absolutely zero evidence of what you're claiming.
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
Dogie, please look at BlackArrow's thread started by  Theymos.  There is now evidence that they have been mining on customer equipment with GPK's recent post.  Please add to original thread once reviewed.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
legendary
Activity: 1161
Merit: 1001
Don`t invest more than you can afford to lose
Any prisma review? Or setup?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Thanks for your responses guys.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
member of GameCredits Dev team
Hello,

Does anyone have any info about https://www.mining-asics-technologies.com/ and their Bitcoin and Scrypt Miners?

I'd like to kow how legit they are. Thanks

Its a scam.

They took preorders for sha-256 ASICs which they claimed to have designed/built but it later turned out they just bought the hardware from another company and claimed it was their design.

Then they claimed to be designing a scrypt ASIC. Many preorders and delays later it turns out that yet again they just bought the machine from another company.

Alcheminer is the company making their scrypt hardware. I tried to get them to clarify the relationship between themselves and MAT and was pretty much ignored. For that reason I don't really trust Alcheminer but they are definitely much less shady than MAT.

Anyways, I'd personally just wait for Bitmains new scrypt ASIC to make a decision.


I am looking to buy some scrypt asic,but in this period probably smarter choice is wait and see what will happened.
At these moment best buy for me is inno sillicon a2 terminator.110mhs-1500$-1000w/h or 35mhs-550$-350w/h.

I found this about Alcheminer:
http://www.ecoinmining.eu/hardware/alcheminer-96mhs-alchemist-scrypt-miner-unboxing-review/
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
Hello,

Does anyone have any info about https://www.mining-asics-technologies.com/ and their Bitcoin and Scrypt Miners?

I'd like to kow how legit they are. Thanks

Its a scam.

They took preorders for sha-256 ASICs which they claimed to have designed/built but it later turned out they just bought the hardware from another company and claimed it was their design.

Then they claimed to be designing a scrypt ASIC. Many preorders and delays later it turns out that yet again they just bought the machine from another company.

Alcheminer is the company making their scrypt hardware. I tried to get them to clarify the relationship between themselves and MAT and was pretty much ignored. For that reason I don't really trust Alcheminer but they are definitely much less shady than MAT.

Anyways, I'd personally just wait for Bitmains new scrypt ASIC to make a decision.
sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 250
Hello,

Does anyone have any info about https://www.mining-asics-technologies.com/ and their Bitcoin and Scrypt Miners?

I'd like to kow how legit they are. Thanks

All ASICS are out of stock, scrypt apparently available, not sure I have seen these guys mentioned on the forum before?

Domain Name: MINING-ASICS-TECHNOLOGIES.COM
Registrar: 1 & 1 INTERNET AG
Whois Server: whois.schlund.info
Referral URL: http://1and1.com
Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.BIZ
Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.COM
Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.DE
Name Server: NS-DE.1AND1-DNS.ORG
Status: ok
Updated Date: 16-feb-2014
Creation Date: 14-feb-2014
Expiration Date: 14-feb-2015

Domain only registered for 1 year ... scam alert? Or not?

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Hello,

Does anyone have any info about https://www.mining-asics-technologies.com/ and their Bitcoin and Scrypt Miners?

I'd like to kow how legit they are. Thanks
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
knc admits that its first batch chips/dies are bad but won't refund
http://forum.kncminer.com/forum/main-category/hardware/66533-missing-dc-dc-converter

That's just yield, the same occurs on any non binned chip miner. You provide more hash rate than required so that even with failed chips you still make the spec.
copper member
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465
Clueless!
The Bitmain calculation appears to be off by 4 points, unless I'm doing it wrong.

10+10+4+10+6+10+10+8+10 = 78

Its 10+10+8+... =82

OMG, summing numbers with different denominators (head explode)
There are no denominators. It's simple addition. Why are so many people who are fascinated with bitcoin so bad at math?


I resemble that remark ....no refund no roi knc Titan 1st batch miner.....by the by doggie ....knc admits that its first batch chips/dies are bad but won't refund
....and have now stated RMA's will take at least 2 months ...their timeline (will likely be longer) I'm sure you are aware of that fact right (can give you links) ....

http://forum.kncminer.com/forum/main-category/hardware/66533-missing-dc-dc-converter

kurt admits such last post on this page..1st batch dies are not up to snuff...but ....still no refund

also

they admit the firmware is not up to snuff either (often quoted on site) and promised scrypt n conversion on miners put on hold (imho forever) that
they used to boost flagging sales before taking the titan off the sales page

anyway yeah bad bad I am at math don' t ya know

(ah well.....did ok with the jupiter....not so good with the titan....only if BTC goes below around $200 usd will I be a crying and if that becomes the case
will simply be part of the flood of tears here on bitcointalk don't ya know) Smiley

but yeah.....knc imho is due for another drop in the rating ....

note to self: avoid all 'pre-order' math....

sr. member
Activity: 459
Merit: 250
The Bitmain calculation appears to be off by 4 points, unless I'm doing it wrong.

10+10+4+10+6+10+10+8+10 = 78

Its 10+10+8+... =82

OMG, summing numbers with different denominators (head explode)
There are no denominators. It's simple addition. Why are so many people who are fascinated with bitcoin so bad at math?
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
The Bitmain calculation appears to be off by 4 points, unless I'm doing it wrong.

10+10+4+10+6+10+10+8+10 = 78

Its 10+10+8+... =82

OMG, summing numbers with different denominators (head explode)
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
The Bitmain calculation appears to be off by 4 points, unless I'm doing it wrong.

10+10+4+10+6+10+10+8+10 = 78

Its 10+10+8+... =82
Pages:
Jump to: