Topic: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? - page 5. (Read 18340 times)

‪" NICOLA TESLA AND THE FREE ENERGY

 The satanic synagogue want to keep controlling the natural resources & energy to keep enslaving mankind. The illuminati have ensured that one of the greatest geniuses, Nikola Tesla, has been almost forgotten. He invented the light bulb (which Edison stole), alternating current, neon light and radar. With the financial support of John Jacob Astor he built a very advanced laboratory in the Colorado Mountains. He experimented with wireless transmission of electric power and succeeded, among other things, in lighting lamps and driving small engines at a distance of 20 to 25 kilometres from the laboratory.

After his death on 7 January 1943, his room at the St. Regis Hotel in New York was searched by FBI agents, who opened his safe and emptied it of all documents (John J. O'Neill, "Prodigal Genius: The Life of Nikola Tesla", New York, 1944). All the inventions, which would have made our lives easier, have been stopped. The freemason who prevented us from benefiting from Tesla's environment-friendly inventions that could have changed history was J. P. Morgan. "

source:   https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=471273202894409&story_fbid=591621297526265

Sorry, but I can't discredit something that has no credibility to start with. Is it arrogant to suggest that the theory that produces devices and experiments that actually work as described is more likely correct? I think not.

If you're so impressed by it, why don't you put your money where your mouth is and invest in their business? You'll make millions when they completely take over the energy market. I personally think the whole thing is just a scam, but that's just, like, my opinion, man. Go ahead and throw your money away. I won't stop you.

If you believe that the current science is wrong, then write a paper and prove it. You're right in saying that it's hard to rewrite books and prove current science wrong (just look at Copernicus and Galileo), but if you have solid evidence then it's totally possible (and a lot easier today than 100+ years ago).

The reason the current theories are used is because they work, and are tested daily by many scientists in the field. Thankfully we live in a time where anyone can give evidence for an esoteric idea without fear of death, unlike in the days of Copernicus and Galileo. So take advantage and prove everyone wrong!

foxpup if you'd rather prefer to discredit and exert arrogance so be it. the only point im trying to make is that there is bunch of scientists proving time and time again that einstein theory dont work 100%. you can easily look it up - especially from those who study aether. this sort of attitude ruins the scientific communities as a whole. g'day.

btw here is an interesting free energy project going on right now - quite impressive:
http://www.searlsolution.com
http://searlmagnetics.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QOE0okG99A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJX17LgBYaQ

You don't need to tell me you're not a physicist; that much is obvious. The politics behind physics is entirely irrelevant as to whether or not it works. If Einstein's theory of relativity was built on incorrect math, the various experiments proving it would not have worked, and neither would any of the technology built on it, regardless of how much political support he had.

If by "we" you mean "you", then of course. Nobody can expect you to understand the advanced stuff when you can't even comprehend the basics. But those of us who do understand basic physics know that there's nothing mysterious about quantum mechanics.

lorentz theory included aether but it didnt give much meaning to it. ritz proven him wrong. he been baffled as a result as to how could matematicians and physicians approve of it. but he did that after einstein's theory of relativety therefore getting himself against big boys in switzerland - zionist movement started there, as well as einstein's early years. at the time british physics school were making good progress and moving into the right direction until the moment physics got policiticised with ww1.


you see. we know about quantum mechanics for very long time now. though noone can properly explain how it works. all we know is that its very chaotic. if we just study the electrodynamics little better and look at everything differently as a result of that, then we would have less conflicts within physics community. once dinasour scientists die then new generation can unite on agreeing on this and work together. its hard to rewrite books and claim thousands of papers and entire life's worth of work worthless. its always been like this. like in history - every source of power dictates history in their own way - doesnt mean that its a lie if it doesnt correlate with history presented by other entity. but history is in its own right to be politically motivated - physics should not.

"  An Aetheric Future
If the aether is what truly powers an electric circuit, it means that mainstream science has gone extremely off-track over the past hundred years. To get back on track, we would need to admit the existence of the aether, study its properties, and figure out how it can be harnessed and manipulated - or captured from the environment to produce free energy!

From Tesla's writings, it seems like aether acts like a highly compressed gas. With his Tesla coil he was able to first isolate the aether (pure voltage) from the current, and then magnify it with his secondary spiral or pancake coil to produce a gain of energy. If this is possible, then there must be many ways to extract energy from this limitless source that fills the universe. We just have to find them.

This 'cold' form of electricity (devoid of electron flow) has many unique properties that are being demonstrated on a regular basis by multiple inventors. For example, when hooked up to an antenna (like the sphere on top of a Tesla coil) it can transmit power wirelessly via longitudinal waves. These waves can then penetrate Faraday cages, unlike conventional transverse waves. Also, aether flow or 'cold electricity' can be used to transmit power down one wire for long distances, in a way that would not be possible with conventional current. In addition, it does not 'burn' like hot electricity, in that individuals have used it to illuminate light bulbs underwater, without getting shocked.

If mainstream science took the time to study and understand the properties of the aether flow, it could allow for a new technological revolution to take place. Not only could we extract free energy from the environment instead of burning fossil fuels, but we could build devices custom-engineered to work optimally with cold electricity. Until those devices were broadly proliferated, we could simply extract energy from the aether, convert it from cold electricity to normal electricity (with electron flow), and use it to power the grid.

Of course the aether is suspected to be involved in more than just electricity. It is suspected to be involved in gravity, inertia, and perhaps even time itself. Perhaps the UFOs flying through the sky are somehow manipulating the aether, and as a result producing a propulsive force. Technologies that utilize the aether could be what takes us to the stars!

Another way to look at the situation, is that until we really understand the aether, we cannot have a true understanding of any of the forces of the universe. For example, scientists today cannot tell you for sure exactly what is the 'stuff' that composes a magnetic field or an electric field. They may claim something about 'virtual photons' flying in and out of our dimension, but they really do not know for sure what is taking place. If they studied the aether, they may be able to come up with an answer.

Instead, we are being kept in the dark by ignorant, cult-like scientists who refuse to look at 'outside of the box' ideas. "

http://www.ascensionnow.co.uk/aether-true-electric-current.html

Really? I could have sworn Lorentz's theories included the aether and it was Einstein's theories (built upon Lorentz's and others) gave evidence that the concept of an aether was not needed, I may be wrong here. I also hadn't heard that he became a superstar to counter Tesla's theories, they were in different fields no? While your "Einstein was a Zionist puppet" conspiracies are fun ideas, I don't think they have much evidence.

If all this were true, and science "chose" the wrong theories back in the 19th century (which is not quite how science works), then how are tens of thousands of independent scientists today using the 100 year old theories of relativity and quanta to do incredible things like quantum entanglement. These theories have never been disproven, which is why they are still used.

Re: the pyramid power plants, post a good link with references and I'll read it, not interested in youtube videos or trawling through pages of nonsense on google.

Edison didn't steal the patent for the light bulb from Tesla (He did steal the idea of it from a bunch of other guys though), Edison did shit on Tesla in countless other ways, and was by all accounts a massive dickhead. And while you're right in saying Tesla was a genius, that doesn't mean that he discovered death rays and free electricity that breaks the laws of physics. Just because some of his ideas were suppressed by Edison et al, doesn't mean that every patent he filed/idea he wrote down was plausible.

The main device everyone goes on about are his Wireless Energy Towers (the ones with the phallic shape). No, they didn't produce free energy, they were powered by huge AC generators. They could have transmitted the energy wirelessly, but they didn't harvest it from some sort of mystical source.

I have seen some documentaries going on about Pyramid power stations harnessing hidden pockets of energy and was totally unconvinced, it all seems like pseudoscience to me. I'm not interested in watching any more youtube docus on it, feel free to post a good quality link with references and I'll read it.

A lot of these ideas can be put down to semantics, when people say "free energy" some mean energy you don't have to pay for, others mean "over-unity" which doesn't exist of course. PV cells are kind of free in a way, but you still need to buy and install them, so really they're not much different from oil or nuclear, just that solar energy is easier to collect and convert than nuclear or fossil fuel energy.

if you want to research then google lorentz electrodynamics and ritz electrodynamics.
basically when scientific community had to choose from these theories they went for lorentz's one which is now quite evident that its not 100% correct. if we went along with ritz's equasions then eventually we as humanity would develop machines capable of producing carbon-free energy. that was prevented when lorentz theory was chosen. by giving him nobel prize and then having einstein build his relativity theory on top of it and giving nobel prize to him too kind of set it in stone. that means we as humanity were led into the wrong path on purpose. physics community need to go back 140 years and rethink everithing by developing ritz's work. tesla is the only well known guy who did work not for money trying to develop ether theory that holds the key. einstein was antipod to tesla promoted to destroy ether theory once and for all. then in 20th century everybody who were developing ether theory were ether not sponsored, descredited or killed on the operating table. im not physicist but understanding the politics behind physics is absolutely crucial.

http://www.geocities.ws/karim_khaidarov/ether-e.htm

That's easy. People give him credit for breaking the laws of physics. The argument against that is that he was a mere mortal, and not some sort of godlike being. Sure, he was a brilliant engineer: he designed an electric motor, experimented with X-rays, and invented most of the technology for practical radio transmission; but he did not break the laws of physics, and there's not much reliable evidence that he even tried or claimed to.

Explain that statement. Nothing in the universe requires the laws of physics to be recognised in any way in order to work. Every one of Telsa's devices either worked or failed in accordance with the laws of physics, regardless of whether he or anyone else recognised or understood the physical processes involved.

you need to research on einstein a bit deeper mate. the only reason he became superstar is to counter tesla's theories which could revolutionise the world of physics. about 140 years ago it went all wrong due to politics affecting the direction of development within physics community. lorentz's electrodynamics have been chosen which completely disregards ether as anything important - a big mistake. tesla was working on numerous projects that would require for ether to be recognised differently in order for them to be implemented. that would require current lawrene's electrodynamic theory to be revised. so for humanity not to discover the hidden key in physics einstein came to become world known figure supported by sell out scientists and phony nobel prise behing him. general theory of relativity which is based on collection of other people's theories further sets itself in such way that it backs up lawrence's electrodynamics. einstein is a figure placed there by early zionists in order for tesla's true direction in physics to be scrapped forever. towards end of his life most of his works have been seized. whatever he was working on is what we need now to further our knowledge. many physicians are now disputing over their works as nothing works properly. we cannot understand quantum mechanics before we correctly understand electrodynamics.


whoever is interested.. just google "giza power plant" - plenty of info there.

Edison fucking stole the patent of the light bulb from Tesla (who propably didn't give a shit anyway as he wasn't in it for the money) - I've done my research on that guy and he was a true genious way ahead of his time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98QwPO1b5j4 watch this documentary to get a picture. Heard of his death beam that could down planes? He made that discovery into a puzzle and gave parts of the puzzle to the 3 great powers of the world, USA, China and Russia so they all would have to cooporate in order to build it.

We have free energy already, it's called solar panels but there is more to that as well and it revolves around the pyramides. Tesla knew how to make free electricity to the world but there is no profit in it and as ABBA so nicely puts it; "It's a rich mans world". I would explain further into detail regarding those hot spots on the earth where the free energy can be harvested but I am not really in the mood to find the right documentary about it (it may be covered in the link I provided you with, don't remember). Watch the documentary anyway, or come with arguments about why Tesla weren't so great that some people give him credit for.

Hah, well put. I wish people would stfu about Tesla. Yeah he was a good scientist and did some valuable research, but he's not on the same level as guys like Planck/Einstein/Schrodinger/Bohr who REALLY pushed the boundaries of science.

Tesla would be proper pissed off if he could see the bullshit people are attributing to his name. Just because Isaac Newton discovered gravity doesn't mean that the philosopher's stone is real...

Because in any country such as Russia, greed and corruption also exist.

Why would Soviet Union leaders suppress it, for 70 straight years, when they can use it to brag about the superiority of their engineers, bring down US oil empire, and become the dominant energy producer in the world? They didn't care about financial stuff of capitalism.

Maybe there are some who were able to replicate it, but those guys in the higher ups manage to suppress their inventions/innovations by financial threats, harm to their families or by any other means necessary. If J.P. Morgan was able to do it why is it not possible now since there are a lot of companies that will be gravely affected by it?

I believe that academics should be sued because they suppress the free energy.

Since Tesla's time, we have developed instruments and technology even beyond his comprehension. What he was working with is the equivalent of trying to send astronauts to the moon using nothing but wood, hammer, nails, and gunpowder. We can test and detect things he didn't even dream existed.

So, how come no one had been able to replicate any parts of his later comparatively primitive technology? J.P. Morgan does not control the world. For 70+ years there was a whole country full of brilliant scientists and engineers completely walled off from the rest of the world, safe from J.P. Morgan's influence. They also has access to all of the same info that was publicly available on Tesla as everyone else, and knew about his inventions. So, can someone explain to me why they never invented or figured out anything close to what Tesla claimed with his flying machine and free energy?

For that matter, that superpower country was also not under control or threat of oil and energy companies, and had a huge incentive to invent a free energy or overunity device to bring down American oil empire. How come they failed despite decades of trying?

Yep, Tesla did it, but greed and capitalism killed it, who else but J.P. Morgan

http://www.thrivemovement.com/jp-morgan-cut-tesla-funding

Nikola Tesla was an inventor beyond his time. Having obtained dozens and dozens of patents for his work, he experienced several periods of success, though he struggled to finance the Wardenclyffe project. Shrouded in secrecy, the intentions of the project were unclear to the public, however, once desperate for money, Tesla felt that he must reveal them to Morgan in order to secure further financing. Margaret Cheney, author of Tesla: Man Out of Time, estimates that Tesla had misjudged Morgan. “The prospect of beaming electricity to penniless Zulus or Pygmies,” she wrote, left the financier unenthusiastic about the project. Morgan ceased funding shortly thereafter. 

Sources:

1. William J. Broad. "A Battle to Preserve a Visionary's Bold Failure." New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/05/science/05tesla.html.

2. Ron Chenrow. The House of Morgan (174, 257, 289).

3. International Copper Association, http://www.copperinfo.com/aboutcopper/index