However, when it comes to games like dice, slots, and sports betting, I don't think gamblers have the level of control they think they do. These games are unpredictable, and the outcomes are often future events or chance.
In sports betting, for instance, you're predicting a future event, which is uncertain. Similarly, with dice, the outcome is determined by a random roll, and you have no control over the result.
For sports, some gamblers have a favourable betting option that works for them and they would never change that winning strategy. Some bet few games like 3-5 games, some maximum of 5 odds, some bet only on ov goals or under goals and I think that is a reasonable control in their bet.
I think the illusion of control comes from gamblers' past experiences, where they may have had success in certain games or at specific times. This can create a false sense of control, leading them to believe they can influence the outcome of games that are largely determined by chance.
Most players who won at some point especially few times and ran away feel they have control of those games because they were having a lucky straight win at the time. I have had someone who boosted to be a champ on certain table game but couldn't hold his ground when it mattered most.
So, while you may have some control in intellectual games like cards, you have little to no control in games that rely on chance or future events like dice.
Cards like chess depends on the IQ of the other player, yes they are intellectual games but I prefer chess more to have the illusion of a reasonable control than dice whose goal is either to roll harder or slower and the outcome is still not controlled by the player