IN STOCK - OneStringMiner boards, up to 39GH/s last ITEMS: from US$15...FUN!!! - page 6.

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Taugeran on April 16, 2014, 08:24:39 PM

@BenTuras. Is it ok to multihome the power cables on a stack as long as they all come from the same psu?

eg in a stack of 5 from a single psu run 12V and gnd to 1,3,5

I ask b/c I've repurposed an xbox 360 psu into a 230W 12V adj bench supply. While I wait on a female pcie connector I planned on hooking the wires up to the screw terminals

In a stack of five, I would connect gnd and 12V from the PSU to the board in the middle(#3) and use the supplied inter board power cables to connect #3 to #2 and #4 and connect #2 to #1 and #4 to #5

The inter board power cable is the cable between the tire wraps and the hex spacers:

(Contents of DIY1 set)

Taugeran

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

CCNA: There i fixed the internet.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 02:45:32 PM

Excellent news on all fronts.
I am using a Corsair 500 Watt PSU. Working great with them.
Thanks for the update.

Quote from: BenTuras on April 16, 2014, 12:35:13 PM

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

Are you closer to a firmware update for the Serial connection that works up to your standards yet?

We're still busy optimising it and not satisfied yet.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

How many boards would need to be setup before you would need to hook up more than one PCIe power cable to them?

The official statement is 5 boards max to one PCIe cable.
A good PSU manufacturer will use quality cables and you can go higher.
The interboard power cables we supply with the board are of good quality.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

Also to you suggest two power cables in one board or one on every other one or some sort of scheme?

No, the board works perfect with one of the two PCIe connections used.

@BenTuras. Is it ok to multihome the power cables on a stack as long as they all come from the same psu?

eg in a stack of 5 from a single psu run 12V and gnd to 1,3,5

I ask b/c I've repurposed an xbox 360 psu into a 230W 12V adj bench supply. While I wait on a female pcie connector I planned on hooking the wires up to the screw terminals

ManeBjorn

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1004

Excellent news on all fronts.
I am using a Corsair 500 Watt PSU. Working great with them.
Thanks for the update.

Quote from: BenTuras on April 16, 2014, 12:35:13 PM

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

Are you closer to a firmware update for the Serial connection that works up to your standards yet?

We're still busy optimising it and not satisfied yet.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

How many boards would need to be setup before you would need to hook up more than one PCIe power cable to them?

The official statement is 5 boards max to one PCIe cable.
A good PSU manufacturer will use quality cables and you can go higher.
The interboard power cables we supply with the board are of good quality.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

Also to you suggest two power cables in one board or one on every other one or some sort of scheme?

No, the board works perfect with one of the two PCIe connections used.

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

Are you closer to a firmware update for the Serial connection that works up to your standards yet?

We're still busy optimising it and not satisfied yet.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

How many boards would need to be setup before you would need to hook up more than one PCIe power cable to them?

The official statement is 5 boards max to one PCIe cable.
A good PSU manufacturer will use quality cables and you can go higher.
The interboard power cables we supply with the board are of good quality.

Quote from: ManeBjorn on April 16, 2014, 10:15:30 AM

Also to you suggest two power cables in one board or one on every other one or some sort of scheme?

No, the board works perfect with one of the two PCIe connections used.

ManeBjorn

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1004

Are you closer to a firmware update for the Serial connection that works up to your standards yet?

I do have a question.

How many boards would need to be setup before you would need to hook up more than one PCIe power cable to them?
Also to you suggest two power cables in one board or one on every other one or some sort of scheme?

Thanks

Quote from: BenTuras on April 16, 2014, 08:27:57 AM

Quote from: -ck on April 16, 2014, 08:05:21 AM

OSM or even a longer name without the number is enough since the communication protocol already reports back the number of chips, otherwise I'd need to manually add any unique combination that comes out every time you design a new board Wink

Agree, so I compiled a version with the string 'OneString' as iProduct.
This file is for Con only, please do not update your board until cgminer supports this new iProduct ID!!
http://www.btcguru.eu/downloads/BETA/firmware.bin-OneString

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: -ck on April 16, 2014, 08:05:21 AM

OSM or even a longer name without the number is enough since the communication protocol already reports back the number of chips, otherwise I'd need to manually add any unique combination that comes out every time you design a new board Wink

Agree, so I compiled a version with the string 'OneString' as iProduct.
This file is for Con only, please do not update your board until cgminer supports this new iProduct ID!!
http://www.btcguru.eu/downloads/BETA/firmware.bin-OneString

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: BenTuras on April 14, 2014, 08:27:37 AM

Quote from: -ck on April 14, 2014, 08:17:35 AM

That would then discriminate against any other cscape based bitfury mining hardware that comes out with >6 chips and alas they all have no unique identifier apart from:

Code:

  iManufacturer           1 c-scape
  iProduct                2 bi?fury

Which the bi*fury, hex*fury and these OSMs have as well. Now if you wanted to get the designer to change the iProduct in your devices it would be mighty helpful for both of us.

I agree, we had thought about it but valued compatibility with existing cgminer program higher than the additional time required to create our own driver in cgminer.

Now that you are supporting our OSMs, it's a different story. (It was our choice to not get you on board earlier).

What do you think of naming the product OneStringMiner15, or OSM15 to have a unique iProduct and an indication of the number of chips on it ?

The existing customers can chose to update their firmware once there is an advantage in doing so.
In the mean time their OneStringMiner just keeps on running with the default Bitfury driver and settings.

OSM or even a longer name without the number is enough since the communication protocol already reports back the number of chips, otherwise I'd need to manually add any unique combination that comes out every time you design a new board Wink

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: dogie on April 16, 2014, 07:37:30 AM

Quote from: BenTuras on April 16, 2014, 07:30:27 AM

Quote from: dogie on April 16, 2014, 07:21:42 AM

How tall does a 33 stack go?

*grins* I would make 2 towers, but if you insist: ~ 33 x 2.5cm or 33 inch

You should rename the special offer to #towerofpower. If you can get it up to 240cm then you can wedge it into the ceiling and no more stability problems Wink

You could literally make hot and cold corridors by making towers to the ceiling!

Ha ha ha ha ha, your imagination is running wild.
OK, specially for you: #towerofpower, 100 bare boards, 22.5BTC - 3 TH/s - the dogie special Wink

stock is limited for this special model, LOL

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: BenTuras on April 16, 2014, 07:30:27 AM

Quote from: dogie on April 16, 2014, 07:21:42 AM

How tall does a 33 stack go?

*grins* I would make 2 towers, but if you insist: ~ 33 x 2.5cm or 33 inch

You should rename the special offer to #towerofpower. If you can get it up to 240cm then you can wedge it into the ceiling and no more stability problems Wink

You could literally make hot and cold corridors by making towers to the ceiling!

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: dogie on April 16, 2014, 07:21:42 AM

How tall does a 33 stack go?

*grins* I would make 2 towers, but if you insist: ~ 33 x 2.5cm or 33 inch

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

How tall does a 33 stack go?

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Replaced by the EASTER SPECIAL OFFER, which runs till Monday.

33 board, ~1TH/s special offer:
This offer is valid till Thursday, April 20, noon CET
You will receive 33 bare boards.
Payment in BTC or bank transfer. 7.5BTC or the equivalent in fiat, exchange rate from bitpay.com.
VAT will have to be added for European orders, unless you have a valid VAT number.
Your order will be shipped by FedEx, free of charge, after we received your payment.
Speed of 25GH/s is guaranteed per board, with proper cooling they run faster than 30GH/s, making a total of over 1TH/s.
Have a look at the DIY1 product for ideas about cooling.
Overvolting possible for even higher speeds, but voids warranty.
16 board tower:

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: -ck on April 14, 2014, 08:17:35 AM

That would then discriminate against any other cscape based bitfury mining hardware that comes out with >6 chips and alas they all have no unique identifier apart from:

Code:

  iManufacturer           1 c-scape
  iProduct                2 bi?fury

Which the bi*fury, hex*fury and these OSMs have as well. Now if you wanted to get the designer to change the iProduct in your devices it would be mighty helpful for both of us.

I agree, we had thought about it but valued compatibility with existing cgminer program higher than the additional time required to create our own driver in cgminer.

Now that you are supporting our OSMs, it's a different story. (It was our choice to not get you on board earlier).

What do you think of naming the product OneStringMiner15, or OSM15 to have a unique iProduct and an indication of the number of chips on it ?

The existing customers can chose to update their firmware once there is an advantage in doing so.
In the mean time their OneStringMiner just keeps on running with the default Bitfury driver and settings.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: BenTuras on April 14, 2014, 07:48:24 AM

Quote from: -ck on April 14, 2014, 05:56:12 AM

I have received 3 of these bare boards courtesy of BenTuras to aid software development. They are working fine on the current cgminer, though I have added some device specific tweaks which will be in the next release of cgminer due out soon. An example from each board follows:

On screen: (BXF was based on Bi*fury and M specifies multiple, hence they're called MXF in cgminer)

Code:

 5: MXF 3       :  48.2C                  | 30.74G / 30.68Gh/s WU:  430.0/m

And API stats output:
...

Thanks!
And I think the abbreviation should be OSM Wink

Looking forward to the next version of cgminer.

That would then discriminate against any other cscape based bitfury mining hardware that comes out with >6 chips and alas they all have no unique identifier apart from:

Code:

  iManufacturer           1 c-scape
  iProduct                2 bi?fury

Which the bi*fury, hex*fury and these OSMs have as well. Now if you wanted to get the designer to change the iProduct in your devices it would be mighty helpful for both of us.

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: -ck on April 14, 2014, 05:56:12 AM

I have received 3 of these bare boards courtesy of BenTuras to aid software development. They are working fine on the current cgminer, though I have added some device specific tweaks which will be in the next release of cgminer due out soon. An example from each board follows:

On screen: (BXF was based on Bi*fury and M specifies multiple, hence they're called MXF in cgminer)

Code:

 5: MXF 3       :  48.2C                  | 30.74G / 30.68Gh/s WU:  430.0/m

And API stats output:
...

Thanks!
And I think the abbreviation should be OSM Wink

Looking forward to the next version of cgminer.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

I have received 3 of these bare boards courtesy of BenTuras to aid software development. They are working fine on the current cgminer, though I have added some device specific tweaks which will be in the next release of cgminer due out soon. An example from each board follows:

On screen: (BXF was based on Bi*fury and M specifies multiple, hence they're called MXF in cgminer)

Code:

 5: MXF 3       :  48.2C                  | 30.74G / 30.68Gh/s WU:  430.0/m

And API stats output:

Code:

   [STATS] => 5
   [ID] => MXF3
   [Elapsed] => 1207
   [Calls] => 0
   [Wait] => 0.000000
   [Max] => 0.000000
   [Min] => 99999999.000000
   [Version] => 0.0
   [Revision] => 0
   [Chips] => 15
   [NonceRate] => 0.714369
   [NoMatchingWork] => 0
   [Temperature] => 48.200000
   [Max DeciTemp] => 490
   [Clock] => 54
   [Core0 hwerror] => 2
   [Core0 jobs] => 0
   [Core0 submits] => 613
   [Core1 hwerror] => 5
   [Core1 jobs] => 0
   [Core1 submits] => 576
   [Core2 hwerror] => 0
   [Core2 jobs] => 0
   [Core2 submits] => 580
   [Core3 hwerror] => 5
   [Core3 jobs] => 0
   [Core3 submits] => 614
   [Core4 hwerror] => 35
   [Core4 jobs] => 0
   [Core4 submits] => 568
   [Core5 hwerror] => 3
   [Core5 jobs] => 0
   [Core5 submits] => 603
   [Core6 hwerror] => 59
   [Core6 jobs] => 0
   [Core6 submits] => 494
   [Core7 hwerror] => 10
   [Core7 jobs] => 0
   [Core7 submits] => 576
   [Core8 hwerror] => 1
   [Core8 jobs] => 0
   [Core8 submits] => 588
   [Core9 hwerror] => 2
   [Core9 jobs] => 0
   [Core9 submits] => 620
   [Core10 hwerror] => 2
   [Core10 jobs] => 0
   [Core10 submits] => 550
   [Core11 hwerror] => 8
   [Core11 jobs] => 0
   [Core11 submits] => 544
   [Core12 hwerror] => 22
   [Core12 jobs] => 0
   [Core12 submits] => 543
   [Core13 hwerror] => 2
   [Core13 jobs] => 0
   [Core13 submits] => 580
   [Core14 hwerror] => 3
   [Core14 jobs] => 0
   [Core14 submits] => 590
   [USB Pipe] => 0
   [USB Delay] => r0 0.000000 w0 0.000000
   [USB tmo] => 21594 0

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: freddyfarnsworth on April 14, 2014, 03:47:20 AM

That is very cool

And a very nice 10% bonus hasrate!

freddyfarnsworth

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

That is very cool

yslyung

legendary

Activity: 1500

Merit: 1002

Mine Mine Mine

bumppp for OSM

my mini display has finally arrived ! hooked up to rpi with the OSM = live stas & bitstamp ticker auto refresh every 30 secs.

tip, my display wasn't working properly when i plugged it into usb hub but after i plugged it directly to rpi usb port it works great after " sudo systemctl restart lcdstats "

happy mining

BenTuras

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1001

Quote from: chek2fire on April 11, 2014, 06:54:58 PM

Hello. I want to get one more board but i think to buy it direct from you and not from ebay that i have previous buy a board. I dont understand how can i pay you. I have see that i need to sent my bank details with email but i dont understand what is the next step for purchase the product. Thank you for any answer

Answered by PM, also here:

The best thing to do is send in an order and indicate that you want to pay by bank transfer.
We'll reply with an invoice and our bank information so you can do the bank transfer.

Topic: IN STOCK - OneStringMiner boards, up to 39GH/s last ITEMS: from US$15...FUN!!! - page 6. (Read 38793 times)