So, what's your approach to solve the issue?
I'm willing to give it a try and look how we can come together.
Will you delete all the politics-related feedback you left on other members (both negative and neutral) and refrain from doing it again? it's all that simple, the 3-day conversation could have ended in 5 minutes if you would just agree to not let your political opinion affect your DT actions,
That's going nowhere, mikeywith if you keep to continue your full demands, as you've done already so often in this thread.
I'm willing to give in, agree to yahoo's approach and after that, you are coming with your full demand that you can dictate which feedbacks I'm having to remove. That's just not helpful.
And that's not something a sane DT member can agree to because DT is a decentralized feedback system. No individual is allowed to dictate anyone anything.
However, the call from yahoo is reasonable and I'm willing to follow his approach.
The third option that I would love not to go to would be to leave everything as is, both of us stop posting here, and we let the community say/do whatever they want with this topic, if they think it should vanish, they would just ignore it and it would go down the drain of page 100 or so, and if they think it should stay (either to express this opinion against me or yourself) then it will stay, and while that happens I promise that I will not under any circumstances post anything in this thread, and so will you.
In this scenario, the community will decide. Community decisions are never bad and I'm willing to apply the community feedback for any of what happens from now on. I'm okay, when I'm getting excluded for the time being like yahoo did above, if that helps to settle our issue. You can distrust me as well, using your DT vote against my feedbacks. I would have to accept any distrust I get.
Furthermore, I will consider community feedback like the one from LoyceV here:
As for the "conflict" that started the whole thing, I'm quite surprised that you both went that far. A completely useless debate where both sides claim that their media sources of information are more honest than the other. That's the first thing I saw after a quick look at the discussion you mentioned.
I think this sums it up nicely. I don't feel like reading all the details, but from what I've seen, none of this should have been a reason to create drama about exclusions and removing positive feedback. So you disagree. It happens. That's okay.
This has potential to turn into a year-long-feut. Don't go there, get a beer together and move on.
And I'm willing to lock my other topic about you:
mikeywith needs to grow a thicker skin regarding DT issues.
Edit: done already to keep it going to find a solution here
So there you go, the ball's in your court
I believe the call from yahoo is reasonable to approach this:
I cannot really say what will end the dispute man. You're not budging and neither is he. Everything that needed to be said was said day 1 IMO between you 2. Having a beer and hashing it out was mentioned and declined. Talking isn't getting anywhere as it just keeps piling up. I get it, you are accused and want to defend your position and he thinks you are in the wrong and wants you to realize it. It's hard to move people from their opinion sometimes. He has brought awareness and people will keep an eye on you no matter what for a bit and see if you are continuing on the path you're being accused of IMO.
The community has 5 pages of stuff to read and decipher. If they want to ~ then they will. If they don't they won't. Ignore button seems like the best thing for you 2 at the moment and let each other have some time to think and reflect.
So,
@yahoo, I'm accepting your call. If you think anyone of us is violating your call, feel free to leave a comment here, I'm ready to accept your terms.