Pages:
Author

Topic: [List]Gambling Board Spammers; Concerns, Solutions & Suggestions - page 9. (Read 3677 times)

legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 2520
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
7. The posting quality will be thoroughly checked – posts in spam mega threads, campaign threads (including this one), necro posts and low-quality posts will not be counted.

The Solutions

* Is there a way the admin can turn thread to a self- moderated thread and hand it over to another OP who is ready to moderate the thread? I will volunteer I spend 90% of my time there.

* Is a self-moderated thread the answer? Yes, it reduces spam; consider JollyGood self-moderated threads as an example; zero 1xbit spammers, zero low posts since the beginning of last season, we talked and agreed to keep it clean for quality discussion only, and the result is fantastic!
I am against self-moderation and I never open my threads with that option if it is not absolutely necessary. I am all out for freedom of speech and true decentralization where no one person has the power to shut somebody down. Self-moderation is not a solution to the problem it is just a remedy to mask the  problem. It is also part of the reason I am not active in those JollyGood threads you mentioned.

I would much rather try to remove the cause of the problem. That is why I wanted that rule you quoted included in signature campaign I am running with cryptofrka, and that is also why we don't have minimum number of posts or required number of posts in gambling. The point should be that every campaign selects users based on their current posting habits and not to enforce them with rules. If you make a person that knows nothing about gambling to post 10 posts in that section to get paid, what results are you actually expecting?

Anyway, that is just my 2 cents and now I am running away from this strange section on the forum back to gambling where home is Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1552
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
What about those ANN threads on the "Gambling" board where KYC is discussed incessantly? I mean it is okay when someone new to that platform asks about KYC, in which two or three responses are adequate to answer the question. However, that is not the case, as it is evident that people are simply recycling their replies for the sake of increasing their post count.

Not only it pollutes the entire section but it also affects that specific gambling platform negatively.

Most of my reported cases went unhandled, not because they were bad reports, but because they never got to the mod or the mod decided to ignore them. It is difficult to report when the end result is ¹/⁴.
I also have unhandled cases but I am not certain if its coming from Gambling section. Hopefully, I can reach the required number of reports so I can see some stats...
staff
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1610
The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛
I'd say just report what you think is low quality. The moderators in that section are definitely active, and they'd probably welcome reports in that section. I only see newbie reports there, and they aren't that often, so I'm wondering if it might be the same for higher ranked accounts.
Most of my reported cases went unhandled, not because they were bad reports, but because they never got to the mod or the mod decided to ignore them. It is difficult to report when the end result is ¹/⁴.

I actually started reporting as a knee-jerk reaction and yeah, I think this could be the quickest solution. I'll consider doing that now for 2 threads I created -- and point them to the new one. There were a trio of 3 threads for UEFA club competitions but since JollyGood already has one for the main Champions League, I guess I'll leave that be unless he has a joint solution
Yes, it has, and in the spirit of "there is always room for improvement," you can open yours, as most users who were blacklisted from the JollyGood thread may be given another chance on yours.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3408
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Quote
I agree that threads I opened could probably be turned to self-moderated (you named one but I have others also attracting spam) -- I don't mind moderating, though I might be accused of being too harsh, and could be biased to all the users I already know gamble (but that bias is good right?).
Quick solution; lock and create a self-moderated one? Saves time.

I actually started reporting as a knee-jerk reaction and yeah, I think this could be the quickest solution. I'll consider doing that now for 2 threads I created -- and point them to the new one. There were a trio of 3 threads for UEFA club competitions but since JollyGood already has one for the main Champions League, I guess I'll leave that be unless he has a joint solution.

Quote
Lock the thread; create a self-moderated thread
A new thread should be created at the beginning of every season. Old thread locked.
I'd second about this solution and it's make sense.

Actually, the new threads I created for Champions League (because old one was locked and creator gone) and the subsequent Europe and Conference ones I intended to keep OP updated with results of every season (you can see this already). Posterity is quite nice?

I see nothing wrong with mega threads if they're well manicured or pruned -- WO in Speculation wouldn't be the same if they opened a new one every year. I think a single thread for a single competition makes sense.

As Welsh said I think we all have to simply do better at reporting. I used to, probably not much for gambling sections but will make it a point to do so more often now especially in the threads I created.
staff
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1610
The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛
Thanks for the note igehhh. I concur:
You're welcome!
Quote
1. A lot of spam posts not just in discussion but in ANN threads. It's quite clear who posts with any meaningful understanding and who doesn't, I would even say it's quite clear who actually gambles and who doesn't (it's gambling isn't it?)

Most of the ANN uses bumps pay services it's very easy to detects the sheep's from the goats but that's topic for another day right.  Grin

Quote
Because many campaigns also discourage mega thread posting if not outlaw them, you get the spammers opening new topics -- you see this a lot in Discussion but also creeping up in the main Gambling thread. Low quality content, no new discussion or angle, etc.

You are right, I have about 20+ already on my list that needs to be locked as they contribute to nothing but spams. I will release the list in my next topic and let the admin decide.

Quote
I agree that threads I opened could probably be turned to self-moderated (you named one but I have others also attracting spam) -- I don't mind moderating, though I might be accused of being too harsh, and could be biased to all the users I already know gamble (but that bias is good right?).
Quick solution; lock and create a self-moderated one? Saves time.

Quote
JollyGood's self moderation's a good example of how one could trim the fat, although I have to say at least one was opened despite existing ones -- should really have kept the existing topics (using the example of Champions League and EPL you used in OP) and moderate that together with others (is that possible?). Was there a reason JollyGood opened those new topics? To self-moderate?
I didn't understand the first question and as for the second question, Yes I think the high level of spams on the other mega-thread led him to create a new self-moderated thread for the same league.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1908
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
* Is there a way the admin can turn thread to a self- moderated thread and hand it over to another OP who is ready to moderate the thread? I will volunteer I spend 90% of my time there.
I don't know it's possible or not but it's not going to be happened for sure. Admin won't do that.

Users who already have posted in that thread have posted because they know the thread is not self moderated. They may not post in a self moderated thread. This is just a possible scene.
Your goal is honest but think about the possibilities. It's possible that you will not allow some users to post in your thread just because of your ego. Once again, possibility only.
Quote
Will a neutral tag with a bold message to these users be sufficient to send a signal to sig managers? Too harsh?
I  don’t think you should use the trust system here. A neutral would be fine but I would leave that for campaign manager. I have seen some tag on users for low quality post but they are very old tag. Haven’t seen recently.

Regarding the issue,
There's no doubt that gambling board is full of spammer. I remember when I wanted to have some gambler on Thunderpick signature campaign, it was hard to decide if they were really gamblers or not. By judging their post, I thought they don't gamble but they pretend to be gambler lol.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 801
I spend the majority of my time reporting, especially in the last few days, but that alone is ineffective.
What the feedback you got from moderators then? I guess the majority of your post will stay in unhandled since the post are categorized as soft-bad post, moderators only mark your report are good when it's really shitpost or breaking the rules e.g. post in a row.

Just want to notify you guys! I see some people are very familiar to do post in gambling discussion mega thread.
7. The posting quality will be thoroughly checked – posts in spam mega threads,
I think they're different, sujonali1819 pointed about mega threads on gambling discussion, while Trofo mean spam mega threads like Bitcoin discussion and Altcoins discussion. Honestly I don't understand why sujonali1819 mention to not post in gambling discussion mega thread since there's a lot users there and the discussion keep on going, that's make the thread have a lot replies. However not all mega thread in gambling discussion is really spam, it's just weird the campaign have a minimum gambling board posts but he discourage the users to not post in gambling discussion.

Quote
Lock the thread; create a self-moderated thread
A new thread should be created at the beginning of every season. Old thread locked.
I'd second about this solution and it's make sense.

Quote
Top gambling board spammers; excluded 1xbit spammers.
These users have zero knowledge of the game(Football) you can check their post history for details!
Since I'm football fans too, so I know about their post quality, some of them were shitpost and not have any point, but some of them not. The reason why I said some of those users aren't shitposter because the new campaign (your campaign) are selected some users that you mention as a shitposter. Not going to say your judgement are wrong, but different user have different perspective.

Quote
Will a neutral tag with a bold message to these users be sufficient to send a signal to sig managers? Too harsh?
If you want, you can do it since neutral tag isn't harm their accounts.


To be honest I would like to encourage all author in gambling sections create self moderated thread to make 1xbit spammers has no place to posts in gambling sections, this will make their campaign destroyed.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1094
* Is there a way the admin can turn thread to a self- moderated thread and hand it over to another OP who is ready to moderate the thread? I will volunteer I spend 90% of my time there.
Very possible but probably that is never going to happen.

This will only lead to report the spam posts to moderators, best to report to moderators.

Good members on the gambling board can agree on one thing, to just volunteer users on gambling thread to create a new thread for each what will later be mega threads and make it self moderated, but I am not advising you about this, the person that created the self-moderated thread can be bias.

I expect immediately before the beginning of new season, new threads should be created for those mega threads, the threads are getting too long. But best not to be self-moderated and keep on reporting spam posts.
staff
Activity: 3248
Merit: 4110
I'd say just report what you think is low quality. The moderators in that section are definitely active, and they'd probably welcome reports in that section. I only see newbie reports there, and they aren't that often, so I'm wondering if it might be the same for higher ranked accounts.

It would take the same amount of effort to report the posts, than to self moderate it yourself. Might be even quicker reporting, since you don't have to go through, and delete every post referencing that, whereas the moderator will.

Obviously, there might be a difference of opinion on certain posts. I can see a lot of subjective views being had on the quality of a post. Although, I do believe that the discussion should be resolved around gambling, and not just talking about a team or player for the sake of talking about sports, which I do believe is used quite a bit. I know that can be related at times, but it has to at least stem from a discussion about gambling, and not generic discussion. That's my view point anyhow. The moderators in that section, might have a different view.  

I agree that threads I opened could probably be turned to self-moderated (you named one but I have others also attracting spam) -- I don't mind moderating, though I might be accused of being too harsh, and could be biased to all the users I already know gamble (but that bias is good right?). It was just natural for me to NOT self-moderate to keep the thread censorship free but at this stage, I think the pro (less spam) is preferable to the con (possible censorship).
That doesn't really matter all that much, as it's a self moderated thread. If users don't like the way you're moderating a thread, they can open their own. Although, that does have its own set of problems, especially if we've got two almost identical threads, which are massing replies. Especially, if the spammers then post in both of them to get paid, which I suspect would be the case.


* Is there a way the admin can turn thread to a self- moderated thread and hand it over to another OP who is ready to moderate the thread? I will volunteer I spend 90% of my time there.
Yeah, I do believe it's possible. I believe the Wall Observer thread has been given this treatment in the past.

You've got the right users in Cyrus, and hilariousandco moderating the section. So, they'd likely have the permissions to do something like that. Different matter, whether they deem it appropriate or not, though.

legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 3408
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Thanks for the note igehhh. I concur:

1. A lot of spam posts not just in discussion but in ANN threads. It's quite clear who posts with any meaningful understanding and who doesn't, I would even say it's quite clear who actually gambles and who doesn't (it's gambling isn't it?)

2. Megathreads don't always get their due though, not all of them are low value (again this is arguable but I actually see a lot of value in the WO thread, for example where there IS an active and knowledgeable community, and that alone warrants for the high frequency of posts otherwise would be considered shitposting. I'm guilty myself every now and then but I trust my campaign manager recognises this haha).

Because many campaigns also discourage mega thread posting if not outlaw them, you get the spammers opening new topics -- you see this a lot in Discussion but also creeping up in the main Gambling thread. Low quality content, no new discussion or angle, etc.

I agree that threads I opened could probably be turned to self-moderated (you named one but I have others also attracting spam) -- I don't mind moderating, though I might be accused of being too harsh, and could be biased to all the users I already know gamble (but that bias is good right?). It was just natural for me to NOT self-moderate to keep the thread censorship free but at this stage, I think the pro (less spam) is preferable to the con (possible censorship).

JollyGood's self moderation's a good example of how one could trim the fat, although I have to say at least one was opened despite existing ones -- should really have kept the existing topics (using the example of Champions League and EPL you used in OP) and moderate that together with others (is that possible?). Was there a reason JollyGood opened those new topics? To self-moderate?
staff
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1610
The Naija & BSFL Sherrif 📛
Casinos sig campaign has the most signature participants on the forum, and because of the high demand for gambling-related posts from participants, the gambling discussion board has become a haven for signature spammers - why is this? I bet the majority of those who applied to those campaigns had no knowledge of the game, but because the rules require a minimum of 10 posts on the gambling board, most of these users with no knowledge of the game just spam the hell out of the board with low quality and offtopic discussion to complete post counts. I spend the majority of my time reporting, especially in the last few days, but that alone is ineffective.

The concern.

Just want to notify you guys! I see some people are very familiar to do post in gambling discussion mega thread. I will suggest to not make post on these mega threads. I really don't like this. Smiley

7. The posting quality will be thoroughly checked – posts in spam mega threads, campaign threads (including this one), necro posts and low-quality posts will not be counted.

The Solutions

* Is there a way the admin can turn thread to a self- moderated thread and hand it over to another OP who is ready to moderate the thread? I will volunteer I spend 90% of my time there.

* Is a self-moderated thread the answer? Yes, it reduces spam; consider JollyGood self-moderated threads as an example; zero 1xbit spammers, zero low posts since the beginning of last season, we talked and agreed to keep it clean for quality discussion only, and the result is fantastic!

⚽ English Premier League Season: 2021/2022 self-moderated 356 spam posts deleted

⚽ FOOTBALL: UEFA Champions League 2021/22 Season FINAL Real Madrid vs Liverpool self-moderated 15 spam posts deleted

Now what threads are the spammers fishing on?

⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions by tokeweed

⚽UEFA Champions League Discussion Thread -- 2021/22 winner - Real Madrid by buwaytress

La Liga (Spanish League) Prediction Thread 2020/21 by trofo

Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A) by scaccomatt0

Germany League - Bundesliga Prediction Thread by n30111

Premier League Prediction Thread 2021/2022   by trofo


My Suggestions!
  • Lock the thread; create a self-moderated thread
  • A new thread should be created at the beginning of every season. Old thread locked.
  • Admin to convert the already existing thread to self-moderated.

Top gambling board spammers; excluded 1xbit spammers.

These users have zero knowledge of the game(Football) you can check their post history for details!

Gamgling board stats only!!!
Code:
jakdanye1
superman184
Fesatmas
BitcoinHunt3r
BuNga_cute
Bobrox
Oneandpure
Shasha80
erep
Suzie
Rigon
Luzin
flaming dinners
indah rezqi
MinoRaiola
Ondekinecakabilirim
sayaya17
Raflesia
lalabotax
variable
Wawa2013
bct_ail
hahay
Tony116
Davian144
wmaurik
yudi09

Removed
Code:
marcous

N/B: Casino campaign managers should take note of these users. Added to ignore list.

Will a neutral tag with a bold message to these users be sufficient to send a signal to sig managers? Too harsh?
Pages:
Jump to: