A few days ago we have changed the main cold storage to:
1DmqFgYfKMT1F8B3tGhVMFf82vdgdSsjNV
Signed Message: Satoshi Dice Cold Storage signed 2015-12-27
And secondary cold storage: 18e5jpfn9zo9GQov1Ks9Pzh6Yam2SvFqqo
Signed Message: Satoshi Dice Cold Storage signed 2015-04-12
The old addresses are no longer in use.
Site is down again.
We're under DDoS attack, but it seems just blocking a couple of thousands if IPs solved it for now.
It's back again now. The attack intensified earlier today, but is solved for now.
Now an SSL connection error.
The DDoS is still ongoing, but in low volume so the site is fully functional at the time I'm writing this.
Why is there only 2000 BTC in cold storage suddenly from 4500? that's much less trust/confidence in the existence/security of stated funds then before; less then half of the bank to be shown is very little assurance. I just checked the balances on those 2 addressess and they add up to about 4300, so it's there, but on the site it says each has about 1000, leading one to believe a priori that only about 2000BTC are in those 2 cold storage addresses, so I'd fix this and display on the website the 3000 of that first one instead of 1000 if I were you and wanted to attract investors.
I still take issue with the following about lack of 2FA:
speaking of security, why haven't you got an optional 2FA security for users? unless you consider the password the 2nd factor, and the url the 1st? not nearly the same level of security as an OTP accessible from ones smartphone, like google authenticator IE.
please introduce 2FA ASAP,
and increase the cold storage (at least 3/4 or so); until then I don't feel safe to put my money on something with so little assurance and security.
I also noticed that some of the numbers on the section "How Investor's Percentages of the Bankroll Are Determined" are wrong.
"The original investor's 15 coins now make up 75% and the new investor's 5 coins make up 25% of the total bankroll. If now another 10 coins are lost by players, the first investor gets 7.5 coins and the second investor gets
22.5 2.5 coins, bringing their investments up to 22.5 and
7.7 7.5 coins"
and one clarification, the stated "house profit" is the investor profit right? the expected 0.95% of wagered BTC; not the total casino profit expected house edge of 1.9% correct?
another thing, on the "Potential Risks for Investors"
in the last part you should also include the risk of the operators of satoshidice playing as a player but having access to the server seed know in advance what the outcome will be thus can win every bet, thus scamming money from investors. unless you found some solution to this problem of the current implementation of provably fair.
lastly, I still can't access users pages, stats pages, new user, and others; is this still from the ddos?