Mixers to be banned - page 11. | Bitcointalksearch.org

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1638

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: paid2 on January 04, 2024, 10:15:28 AM

In any case, it's completely hypocritical : look at this topic which is THE source of all this shit and it isn't even wordfiltered. Roll Eyes

Same with this. Heck, the topic isn't even locked or moved to archival like the other mixer topics. I guess it's pointless since all the domains were seized?

But I expected the ANN to be locked and moved to the archival too just like the others

SamReomo

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 672

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 05:36:03 PM

They (people) will know how to not fall in a phishing site. And new mixers are not usually targeted by phishing TLDs.

Yeah, the ones who use mixers probably have some good technical background and they won't fall for the phishing sites in most cases. You're also right the phishers don't really target new mixers because they believe that the users won't use the new mixers. Their main target is always going to be a reputed mixer that has been on the market for quite some time.

Most of the mixers that were on this forum have shifted their threads on another forum. Who knows in future people may find trusted mixers on this forum. The people will always do research before using any of the mixers and as long as their research takes them to a good place then they might not face those phishing sites.

LeGaulois

copper member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 4065

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: LoyceV on January 04, 2024, 03:29:49 PM

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.

Searching for the mixer's names will pop up countless phishing sites, so I don't think there's a point to continue this without URLs.

They (people) will know how to not fall in a phishing site. And new mixers are not usually targeted by phishing TLDs.
As long the rules are respected, there's still a use for some. Probably less usefull we can think but let's try it

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

If a clearnet site has been seized wordfilter would defeat the object because the site will not be accessible. Also, stating the name of the mixer without posting their URL is allowed. Well, I guess that settles that then. By now all members should be clear on what is allowed to be posted as well as what will get them in trouble (but just wait a while and you will see some very strange questions being asked).

Quote from: theymos on January 04, 2024, 01:14:50 PM

Quote from: paid2 on January 04, 2024, 10:15:28 AM

In any case, it's completely hypocritical : look at this topic which is THE source of all this shit and it isn't even wordfiltered. Roll Eyes

The clearnet site was seized, so there's no need to wordfilter it.

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.
Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name?

That's fine. And you can say the names of mixers in posts, unless their name is a URL.

joker_josue

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 4508

**In BTC since 2013**

Quote from: theymos on January 04, 2024, 01:14:50 PM

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.
Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name?

That's fine. And you can say the names of mixers in posts, unless their name is a URL.

Quote from: LoyceV on January 04, 2024, 03:29:49 PM

Searching for the mixer's names will pop up countless phishing sites, so I don't think there's a point to continue this without URLs.

But by continuing with the URL, the forum would be generating organic traffic to these mixing sites. The purpose of this measure is for the forum not to be a provider of organic traffic for these sites. Therefore, it ends up being the readers' responsibility to find these sites in the way they find most appropriate for them.

So, like I say Coca-Cola, I don't generate any traffic for that company. But, if I say Coca-Cola, I will generate traffic for that company.
_{(I'm not trying to advertise)} Cool

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.

Searching for the mixer's names will pop up countless phishing sites, so I don't think there's a point to continue this without URLs.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4732

Merit: 4240

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Any chance we can get an update to the subject line to something like ‘Mixers have been banned’ or ‘Mixers to be banned - update now banned’?

I don’t think this will be any type of problem for the forum or its users. I actually think it’s the people selling goods or services that will likely feel the impact of this, as it seems there will be less coins floating around as a result. I still support it though. Had to be done.

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5166

Merit: 12850

Quote from: paid2 on January 04, 2024, 10:15:28 AM

In any case, it's completely hypocritical : look at this topic which is THE source of all this shit and it isn't even wordfiltered. Roll Eyes

The clearnet site was seized, so there's no need to wordfilter it.

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.
Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name?

That's fine. And you can say the names of mixers in posts, unless their name is a URL.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

I've to read everything again but I'm confused about something.

This topic was considered OK from Theymos POV.
He said something like "we will see how things are going but there's not much problem"
To my understanding, I can continue to update it

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.
Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name?

Late but happy new year guys.

Since BitMixList seems to be OK here, neither of your topics should have any problems although it was a good move for you to remove the URLs.

LeGaulois

copper member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 4065

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: paid2 on January 04, 2024, 10:15:28 AM

In any case, it's completely hypocritical : look at this topic which is THE source of all this shit and it isn't even wordfiltered. Roll Eyes

Surely a conspiracy from the illuminatis. Perhaps Theymos is one of them

To be serious, it seems to be a kind of bug in the filtering. It will surely be fixed ASAP. And if it isn't, since the website is down, there's no problem per se.

paid2

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 1065

Crypto Swap Exchange

In any case, it's completely hypocritical : look at this topic which is THE source of all this shit and it isn't even wordfiltered. Roll Eyes

Xal0lex

staff

Activity: 2436

Merit: 2347

Quote from: LeGaulois on January 04, 2024, 09:33:11 AM

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.
Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name?

Late but happy new year guys.

I didn't delete or edit anything in my topic, the forum bot automatically did it all by itself. And, as you can see, my topic stayed afloat too. Therefore, I think it won't be a problem if we continue to manage our own topics. The main thing is that there are no links and no user redirections towards mixers.

P.S. Happy New Year to you too

LeGaulois

copper member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 4065

Top Crypto Casino

I've to read everything again but I'm confused about something.

This topic was considered OK from Theymos POV.
He said something like "we will see how things are going but there's not much problem"
To my understanding, I can continue to update it

What about this one
Should it be locked or I can keep going on it?
As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers.
Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name?

Late but happy new year guys.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Rikafip on January 03, 2024, 05:07:36 PM

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 08:19:07 AM

I doubt he would return to the forum after more than two years of absence to call theymos an anti-privacy shill and call him someone who is advocating for government censorship

Or maybe its just another alt account from someone who is pissed off that mixer campaigns got banned? It woulndn't be the first nut accusing theymos of crazy stuff like working with goverment etc.

True, I have seen members say extremely strange things. When it comes to fringe element yes but even those who should know better. Some of them are in one moment praising him and giving him credit (including on occasion undue or excessive credit) and the next they are attacking him either at the forefront or subliminally because they disagree with a decision.

Quote from: PrimeNumber7 on January 04, 2024, 02:40:49 AM

A "GOAT" is short for Greatest of all time.

In tennis, in my opinion I would suppose regardless of the number of grand slams won by Nadal and Djokovic, I wonder what "SHEEP", "CAT", "DOG", "BIRD" and "BUFFALO" mean Grin

PrimeNumber7

copper member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1899

Amazon Prime Member #7

Quote from: LoyceV on January 02, 2024, 05:04:35 AM

Quote from: shield132 on January 02, 2024, 04:30:27 AM

Chipmixer campaign participants were goats.

Say what?

A "GOAT" is short for Greatest of all time.

Quote from: LoyceV on January 01, 2024, 08:23:15 AM

Quote from: rat03gopoh on January 01, 2024, 08:18:06 AM

Can wordfilters bot be more effective in catching links inserted between bbcode? I think this is a useful loophole for a while for mixer-managed shills. I can write unclickable links without worrying about getting filtered this way, and it will stay there if no one reports it

Spammers have been using hidden links for years.

This should discourage any non-Newbie from trying:

Quote from: theymos on November 30, 2023, 06:42:44 AM

bypassing the wordfilter will get you banned.

Other than using URL shorteners, presumably, established forum members attempting to bypass the wordfiler with the purpose of reporting the problem to get the wordfilter improve is acceptable? yes?

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 08:19:07 AM

There is nothing pointing towards anything obvious.

Maybe not for you, but for me its pretty obvious at who he aimed that post.

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 08:19:07 AM

I doubt he would return to the forum after more than two years of absence to call theymos an anti-privacy shill and call him someone who is advocating for government censorship

Or maybe its just another alt account from someone who is pissed off that mixer campaigns got banned? It woulndn't be the first nut accusing theymos of crazy stuff like working with goverment etc.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on January 03, 2024, 09:07:02 AM

General sense, isn't it?

You know how they say, problem with common sesne is that is not so common. Tongue

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1090

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Came by to say goodbye to the Mixer Era, it was part of the wild west of Bitcoin as it starts to become more of a Wall Street asset class, I will miss some of those crazy days. I guess we got to put on some suits and do the corporate tax shelter way of finance instead.
Can't have the common folk learn about tax shelters can we now.
Prepare the tax havens and offshore accounts, time to get this baby set back to Ireland and get the Double Irish Arrangement remade just like Apple does it

BitcoinGirl.Club

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 2645

Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 08:19:07 AM

There is nothing pointing towards anything obvious. To me, it did not seem like he was replying to the OP because he stated: "That is insane. Terrible news and terrible decision.Whoever is arguing in favor of it is effectively a government censorship and anti-privacy shill". It seemed his comment was directed more towards a recent post (hence the question).

I doubt he would return to the forum after more than two years of absence to call theymos an anti-privacy shill and call him someone who is advocating for government censorship, that is I asked him who he was replying to.

Quote from: Rikafip on January 03, 2024, 06:16:54 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 04:55:39 AM

Which post you are replying to?

He is obviously replying to theymos announcement. When generally replying to the original post, no need to quote it.

You are an entertainer LOL

Quote from: Rikafip on January 03, 2024, 06:16:54 AM

When generally replying to the original post, no need to quote it.

General sense, isn't it?

Quote from: cryptosize on January 02, 2024, 08:16:13 PM

So I guess it's illegal to have a BTC full node... I wonder why the authorities have done nothing about it.

You must be joking. Bitcoin survived 1.5 half decade. They could not do anything.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

There is nothing pointing towards anything obvious. To me, it did not seem like he was replying to the OP because he stated: "That is insane. Terrible news and terrible decision.Whoever is arguing in favor of it is effectively a government censorship and anti-privacy shill". It seemed his comment was directed more towards a recent post (hence the question).

I doubt he would return to the forum after more than two years of absence to call theymos an anti-privacy shill and call him someone who is advocating for government censorship, that is I asked him who he was replying to.

Quote from: Rikafip on January 03, 2024, 06:16:54 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 04:55:39 AM

Which post you are replying to?

He is obviously replying to theymos announcement. When generally replying to the original post, no need to quote it.

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

Quote from: JollyGood on January 03, 2024, 04:55:39 AM

Which post you are replying to?

He is obviously replying to theymos announcement. When generally replying to the original post, no need to quote it.

Topic: Mixers to be banned - page 11. (Read 23006 times)