ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 1099.

BitSat19

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 62

Quote from: JohnBitCo on February 06, 2020, 01:55:03 PM

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

I always though New Zealand were a better team than the Bangladesh and I also lot a bet today. Cry

Bangladesh play very well and never let Newzealand settled in the match. Would they be able to keep the same performance level in the finals. I doubt on this. Final of a Would cup is a pressure and India is much better & experienced team. But if you bet on Bangladesh, you will get better odds but the risk will be high.

I am not expecting any resistance from Bangladesh as India is much superior in all fields they will win this easily but if Bangladesh have good day then may be we will able to have some good match but until now for me its all about India as all boys giving very good performance in field bowling and batting this is perfect winning combination.

fullhdpixel

hero member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 611

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

Really going to be a good contest. I checked few gambling houses but not offering this match to bet with. If you have any sportsbook listing this U19 world cup final match, please share here. I guess India must be the clear favorites yet Bengal tigers may surprise them. I guess it will not be an easy pick even I have been watch the whole tournament closely.

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 05:31:05 AM

With inexperienced opening batsmen too, they managed 347 so 400 is not a bad target but Rohit not being there matters a lot. Glad to see dube out and feel Jadhav deserves a position top the order as he is a good batsmen.

Except few core players, there has been lots of changes in India teams since their last visit to New Zealand just 12 months back. But, India managed to whitewash in T20 (with 2 surprising tie finishes and deserving super-over wins) but ODI needs long planning and if India would had batted 2nd on first ODI, I guess India might have chased even 400+ totals even with their debutant openers.

JohnBitCo

sr. member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 356

Quote from: onrise on February 06, 2020, 01:03:48 PM

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

I always though New Zealand were a better team than the Bangladesh and I also lot a bet today. Cry

Bangladesh play very well and never let Newzealand settled in the match. Would they be able to keep the same performance level in the finals. I doubt on this. Final of a Would cup is a pressure and India is much better & experienced team. But if you bet on Bangladesh, you will get better odds but the risk will be high.

onrise

sr. member

Activity: 1512

Merit: 316

In 2nd semifinal of U19 World Cup between NZ and Bangladesh, Bangladesh won it very easily chasing a score of 212 , they reached it in 44.1 balls and 6 wickets to spare . Now on Sunday we have a World Cup final between India and Bangladesh and would be a real contest to watch . India might just a little stronger then Bangladesh but on that day being a final pressure would be totally different .

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: Indymoney on February 06, 2020, 10:14:27 AM

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 06, 2020, 09:39:05 AM

Quote from: Tipstar on February 06, 2020, 09:02:22 AM

Surely New Zealand had the benefit of batting second and New Zealand fields are really smaller compared to that in India so it were a batsmen dominated match. Though we can't say that was the only reason for the Indian team to lose, that was one of the reasons. New Zealand is one of the most stable ODI team at current time, just below India in current ratings.

You are ignoring several factors here. New Zealand was without their best players. They were without their best batsman (Kane Williamson) and their best bowlers (Trent Boult, Matt Henry and Lockie Ferguson). Some of their batsmen were out of form (such as Ross Taylor, who regained his form in the first ODI). New Zealand played as a team to win the match, despite several setbacks.

New Zealand is historical a fighting team they have too many ups and downs but their fighting ability is never been end they fight till end now recently they are on top after some long time as Pakistan thrash them two time in World Cup 92 after this now they are again very good side to watch but injury problems and players personal issues also give them some serious set backs.

I haven't noticed any superhuman performance from the New Zealand team in the recent years. They have performed above average, and I will admit that. At the same time, other teams outside the big 3, such as South Africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh have been unable to stop the decline in their respective performances. So in a relative sense, New Zealand can be termed as a rising cricket force.

A part of their recent success should be attributed to the presence of several South Africa born players, including BJ Watling, Neil Wagner, Colin Munro and Colin de Grandhomme. In addition to these players, Ross Taylor is part-Samoan and Ish Sodhi was born in India. And these additions have neutralized the loss of Ben Stokes to England.

Indymoney

full member

Activity: 896

Merit: 236

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 06, 2020, 09:39:05 AM

Quote from: Tipstar on February 06, 2020, 09:02:22 AM

Surely New Zealand had the benefit of batting second and New Zealand fields are really smaller compared to that in India so it were a batsmen dominated match. Though we can't say that was the only reason for the Indian team to lose, that was one of the reasons. New Zealand is one of the most stable ODI team at current time, just below India in current ratings.

You are ignoring several factors here. New Zealand was without their best players. They were without their best batsman (Kane Williamson) and their best bowlers (Trent Boult, Matt Henry and Lockie Ferguson). Some of their batsmen were out of form (such as Ross Taylor, who regained his form in the first ODI). New Zealand played as a team to win the match, despite several setbacks.

New Zealand is historical a fighting team they have too many ups and downs but their fighting ability is never been end they fight till end now recently they are on top after some long time as Pakistan thrash them two time in World Cup 92 after this now they are again very good side to watch but injury problems and players personal issues also give them some serious set backs.

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: Tipstar on February 06, 2020, 09:02:22 AM

Surely New Zealand had the benefit of batting second and New Zealand fields are really smaller compared to that in India so it were a batsmen dominated match. Though we can't say that was the only reason for the Indian team to lose, that was one of the reasons. New Zealand is one of the most stable ODI team at current time, just below India in current ratings.

You are ignoring several factors here. New Zealand was without their best players. They were without their best batsman (Kane Williamson) and their best bowlers (Trent Boult, Matt Henry and Lockie Ferguson). Some of their batsmen were out of form (such as Ross Taylor, who regained his form in the first ODI). New Zealand played as a team to win the match, despite several setbacks.

Tipstar

sr. member

Activity: 1932

Merit: 300

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on February 06, 2020, 08:56:19 AM

Quote from: romero121 on February 06, 2020, 06:29:50 AM

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on February 06, 2020, 05:10:35 AM

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 04:03:46 AM

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

That is the truth, the grounds are small in New Zealand and they played well to chase the target. The pitch was batsman friendly and there is nothing for the bowlers, the team batting second will have the advantage in these kind of situations and to see a match with 695 runs in a match is entertaining for the audience, if the remainder of the series is played on dead pitches then the team chasing will have the advantage.

New Zealand grounds were small which is also a reason for the scoring of 347 by India and the same getting chased by New Zealand by the 49th over. In all the matches played by India, whether it is home ground or away it has got the best audience support. This truly gives boost to play better than the opponent in all conditions. The first match win will pressure up Indian team to stand equal winning the second ODI.

Just admit it. The performance by the Indian bowlers was horrible (in particular medium pacer Shardul Thakur and the spinner Kuldeep Yadav). No excuse is going to make up for their poor bowling. India has some of the best batsmen in the world. If the ground was that small, then what prevented them from making a total of around 400?

Surely New Zealand had the benefit of batting second and New Zealand fields are really smaller compared to that in India so it were a batsmen dominated match. Though we can't say that was the only reason for the Indian team to lose, that was one of the reasons. New Zealand is one of the most stable ODI team at current time, just below India in current ratings.

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: romero121 on February 06, 2020, 06:29:50 AM

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on February 06, 2020, 05:10:35 AM

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 04:03:46 AM

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

That is the truth, the grounds are small in New Zealand and they played well to chase the target. The pitch was batsman friendly and there is nothing for the bowlers, the team batting second will have the advantage in these kind of situations and to see a match with 695 runs in a match is entertaining for the audience, if the remainder of the series is played on dead pitches then the team chasing will have the advantage.

New Zealand grounds were small which is also a reason for the scoring of 347 by India and the same getting chased by New Zealand by the 49th over. In all the matches played by India, whether it is home ground or away it has got the best audience support. This truly gives boost to play better than the opponent in all conditions. The first match win will pressure up Indian team to stand equal winning the second ODI.

Just admit it. The performance by the Indian bowlers was horrible (in particular medium pacer Shardul Thakur and the spinner Kuldeep Yadav). No excuse is going to make up for their poor bowling. India has some of the best batsmen in the world. If the ground was that small, then what prevented them from making a total of around 400?

JSRAW

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1540

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on February 05, 2020, 04:35:59 PM

Quote from: JSRAW on February 05, 2020, 04:20:45 AM

Quote from: Raja_MBZ on February 04, 2020, 08:11:58 PM

~snip~

I don't think this "good change" thing is happening any time soon. There's a hell lot of difference in the domestic structure of Indian cricket and Pakistan cricket, and after observing today's match between India and Pakistan, it's clear that Pakistan will not be able to have a good team in upcoming years. Still, PCB's new management and their roadmap are all flawed; it's time to copy/paste the structures of either Australia or England.

I highly doubt that merely copy/paste of any structure going to help Pakistani cause here, unless PCB recruit some sort of honest individuals, they no need to be 100% honest in that case but they should put country's interest first. At least avoid petty politics and select players on merit only, not because he's someone's nephew etc.

I believe that the major pillar of the structures I was referring to is "merit". So by copying/pasting, I was referring to the cloning of structure which is completely based on merit, hard work, and competitiveness.

Okay, Fair enough. This Sounds legit to me.

I took your statement as you were talking about only implementing domestic structure similar to Shield and County, I take my piece back.

ene1980

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 535

Quote from: pakhitheboss on February 06, 2020, 07:34:26 AM

That is correct NZ grounds are smaller and scoring good runs are easier there. But, last match I felt bowlers were not so committed as they were earlier. There is always a psychological pressure when you are chasing, if the target is big. Scoring big runs will not help India if the ballers are not able to contain the opponent team.

In the past the pitch used to favor the bowlers too as a compensation to the small grounds but now the pitches have dried up and it is hard work for the bowlers, miss hit and the ball goes over the rope and even bad shots landing on the boundary. I like to see a good competition between players rather than seeing flat pitches. I am waiting to see who will win the toss in the second ODI as chasing will be best option in pitches like these.

pakhitheboss

hero member

Activity: 2156

Merit: 803

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: romero121 on February 06, 2020, 06:29:50 AM

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on February 06, 2020, 05:10:35 AM

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 04:03:46 AM

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

That is the truth, the grounds are small in New Zealand and they played well to chase the target. The pitch was batsman friendly and there is nothing for the bowlers, the team batting second will have the advantage in these kind of situations and to see a match with 695 runs in a match is entertaining for the audience, if the remainder of the series is played on dead pitches then the team chasing will have the advantage.

New Zealand grounds were small which is also a reason for the scoring of 347 by India and the same getting chased by New Zealand by the 49th over. In all the matches played by India, whether it is home ground or away it has got the best audience support. This truly gives boost to play better than the opponent in all conditions. The first match win will pressure up Indian team to stand equal winning the second ODI.

That is correct NZ grounds are smaller and scoring good runs are easier there. But, last match I felt bowlers were not so committed as they were earlier. There is always a psychological pressure when you are chasing, if the target is big. Scoring big runs will not help India if the ballers are not able to contain the opponent team.

romero121

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1214

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on February 06, 2020, 05:10:35 AM

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 04:03:46 AM

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

That is the truth, the grounds are small in New Zealand and they played well to chase the target. The pitch was batsman friendly and there is nothing for the bowlers, the team batting second will have the advantage in these kind of situations and to see a match with 695 runs in a match is entertaining for the audience, if the remainder of the series is played on dead pitches then the team chasing will have the advantage.

New Zealand grounds were small which is also a reason for the scoring of 347 by India and the same getting chased by New Zealand by the 49th over. In all the matches played by India, whether it is home ground or away it has got the best audience support. This truly gives boost to play better than the opponent in all conditions. The first match win will pressure up Indian team to stand equal winning the second ODI.

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

Quote from: MinerHQ on February 06, 2020, 04:36:03 AM

It looks like a good batting surface and ground was small too. Also, the Indian side bowling performance was not that great. India still got a chance to bounce back in this series and let's see how they will perform in the next match.

India's side both openers are not experienced players and that will be a disadvantage. If they give a good start then middle-order batsman can play good and bowling need to improve the line and length. I think India needs to win next both matches to win this series.

Remembering the old matches between Aus-India where the grounds were damn good for batting and 400+ was the target throughout the series. The case here is the same where the target should be 400, nothing less.

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on February 06, 2020, 05:10:35 AM

That is the truth, the grounds are small in New Zealand and they played well to chase the target. The pitch was batsman friendly and there is nothing for the bowlers, the team batting second will have the advantage in these kind of situations and to see a match with 695 runs in a match is entertaining for the audience, if the remainder of the series is played on dead pitches then the team chasing will have the advantage.

With inexperienced opening batsmen too, they managed 347 so 400 is not a bad target but Rohit not being there matters a lot. Glad to see dube out and feel Jadhav deserves a position top the order as he is a good batsmen. I feel Rohit will again try and put Rahul up the order to try new combinations after losing the first ODI.

7788bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 1023

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 04:03:46 AM

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

That is the truth, the grounds are small in New Zealand and they played well to chase the target. The pitch was batsman friendly and there is nothing for the bowlers, the team batting second will have the advantage in these kind of situations and to see a match with 695 runs in a match is entertaining for the audience, if the remainder of the series is played on dead pitches then the team chasing will have the advantage.

MinerHQ

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1023

Quote from: erikalui on February 06, 2020, 04:03:46 AM

I really thought a 347 total was good enough to defend but NZ played brilliantly from the start, especially Taylor who managed to get 100+ runs and get a good partnership. Even Latham had a SR of 145 which made them get those runs fast and reach 300 runs by the 41st over itself after which the chase became easy. Thakur and Yadav both went for runs and from the 30th over only it looked like an easy chase for them unable to get Taylor's wicket. If Taylor had been out, the result would have been different.

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

It looks like a good batting surface and ground was small too. Also, the Indian side bowling performance was not that great. India still got a chance to bounce back in this series and let's see how they will perform in the next match.

India's side both openers are not experienced players and that will be a disadvantage. If they give a good start then middle-order batsman can play good and bowling need to improve the line and length. I think India needs to win next both matches to win this series.

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

I really thought a 347 total was good enough to defend but NZ played brilliantly from the start, especially Taylor who managed to get 100+ runs and get a good partnership. Even Latham had a SR of 145 which made them get those runs fast and reach 300 runs by the 41st over itself after which the chase became easy. Thakur and Yadav both went for runs and from the 30th over only it looked like an easy chase for them unable to get Taylor's wicket. If Taylor had been out, the result would have been different.

Missing Rohit now as India will need to make 400 runs which can be defended. 350 seems too easy to chase.

onrise

sr. member

Activity: 1512

Merit: 316

Quote from: 7788bitcoin on February 05, 2020, 09:38:23 PM

Quote from: BitSat19 on February 05, 2020, 04:59:04 PM

This is part of play these bowlers give you 0 - 5 historical whitewash in twenty/20 games so if they outplayed in one game you cannot blame them they done good work but small ground and Taylor both stand between them as same happen in South Africa they lost test series and now play back in ODI its all about game.

That is a good comparison, South Africa too won the match chasing the total but it was a below par total and New Zealand won the match chasing a big total and with the bowlers India had i thought it was a good score to win the match for India but Ross Taylor played an incredible innings to take the team home and i am expecting Kohli will come up with a strategy for the second ODI, but toss will be the major factor as the team chasing might win the matches.

It was so worth watching this match as NZ truly played like champions ystd and ensured that they did not end up on losing side despite all the hard efforts they put in and in the end lose the match . Also Ross Taylor ensures that he only will finish the match and come. Overall NZ stopped their losing run and started to win . Things even changed for SA against England as they also started the ODI series on a winning note .

eaLiTy

hero member

Activity: 2814

Merit: 911

Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe

Quote from: Juggy777 on February 05, 2020, 10:27:45 PM

It’s fair to say that we all were left stunned by the performance produced by New Zealand players, as none of us were expecting them to thrash team India and win this match after an humiliating loss in the T20 series. It’s pertinent to note that the difference between the two team was India's old nemesis i.e. Ross Taylor, who once again rose to the occasion and made sure New Zealand salvage some pride by beating team India.

When India was able to score close to 350 runs i thought it will be a tough chase in the absence of Kane Williamson and yet they were able to chase the score easily even though they lost some wickets during the final few overs, it is good to see these kind of performance because the odds were getting lower for India as they were dominating and this defeat will have some good odds in the next match by the book makers Cheesy

.

Juggy777

hero member

Activity: 2646

Merit: 686

Quote from: onrise on February 05, 2020, 06:38:02 AM

Quote from: ene1980 on February 05, 2020, 06:11:24 AM

Quote from: pakhitheboss on February 05, 2020, 05:08:36 AM

They will win great chase, i thought they would lose this match after seeing the score they need to chase. Great batting by Taylor and Nicholls. This win will boost their confidence.

Even i was expecting the pressure to consume them and make a mess and fail to chase the score as they are not having Williamson in the team.

Quote from: Haunebu on February 05, 2020, 05:56:12 AM

They managed to chase down such a big total with 11 balls to spare proving that they can still win(Sometimes). Kuldeep was pretty bad though he took a couple of important wickets while Bumrah and Jadeja bowled nicely. Lets see if India can bounce back in the 2nd ODI(Most probably will).

The India bowlers were not able to contain the New Zealand batsman even with a good total on the board and India will try their best to bounce back, the odds for New Zealand to win were really high after India scored a huge total and i was not having the confidence to place a bet as i did not expect New Zealand to chase the score so easily.

NZ would be most relieved today after breaking the loss jinx and winning the match comfortable in the end. Taylor who stood like a wall helped NZ in this win along with Natham and Nicholls who also played well. Taylor for his brilliant knock of 109 not out was given Player of the match. At one time when Neesham & Grandhomme fall quickly India just could have made comeback if they would have got out Taylor during this time.

It’s fair to say that we all were left stunned by the performance produced by New Zealand players, as none of us were expecting them to thrash team India and win this match after an humiliating loss in the T20 series. It’s pertinent to note that the difference between the two team was India's old nemesis i.e. Ross Taylor, who once again rose to the occasion and made sure New Zealand salvage some pride by beating team India.

Topic: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod] - page 1099. (Read 161248 times)