I have had no problem with my bitcoin wallet at all, it synced almost immediately.
The Idea of it I like. However I think most, if not 90% of people I know that might be interested in this kind of anonymity, would be put off by the difficulty of the whole setup process involved.
Especially when the wallet says its ready but it isn't and you need to go do a whole lot more work/syncing to get it even functioning.
The time isn't really the problem, its the whole process. I know this might be the price of anonymity, but I think it could be streamlined a LOT more if that's what the creators wanted.
I guess that's the way it is intended at this stage however, otherwise I am sure it would have been addressed by now!
I wanted to compare the speed of synchronizing anc/btc from the beginning ..
But the daily synching is also faster at least x5
I use the wallet over clearnet, so I do not know how is with Tor/I2P
And for all who use Clearnet,
with Zercoin it will make transactions anonymous even with clearnet use, which is why it is important to complete it. That way everyone that know how to use bitcoin/litecoin today will be able to use anoncoin to stay anonymous.
There are certain attacks to check if a given *coin{d,-qt} has an address in its wallet or not. So it is still a good idea to use it over I2P, otherwise you can map the location to an anddress.