Pages:
Author

Topic: [POOL] YAAMP.COM multipool multialgo profit switch with exchange - page 67. (Read 181262 times)

full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 100
Hi, Yaamp !
Please add to SCRYPT pool (TagCoin and EarthCoin).

Keep up the good work Smiley
Best Regards.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
And now checking it again, my balance is down to 184... no pending transfers or TXID's for transfers. Huh

newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Thanks your reply.

I have one more question; is that possible to mine in Neoscrpyt pool, but recieve coins in another type of coin of another protocol -like x11?

absolutely, all combinations are allowed



Along this same topic... i've mined with x11 with a doge coin address for payout. have 2370 earned. and only 1.22 paid out. the balanced has been confirmed for ~30hrs. yet last night i only recieved a payout of  1.16.

Care to explain?

Also, the address is valid, the 2 payouts have been confirmed on the receiving end already. ( DTRXVULGEBUMb5o8MQUCJCm1vtZ9ufGBg2 ) is the address.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
I'm testing to mine with my gpu.

Mining neoscrypt with port 4233
This is my bat line: cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u 5hvcSK47uVapYjNYRzQuC24sE9WxzxpovX -p ARI

But my hashrate seems 0. Altough its around 80.
What's the problem on my side?

http://i.imgur.com/MONqLDN.jpg


full member
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
Thanks your reply.

I have one more question; is that possible to mine in Neoscrpyt pool, but recieve coins in another type of coin of another protocol -like x11?

absolutely, all combinations are allowed

newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Thanks your reply.

I have one more question; is that possible to mine in Neoscrpyt pool, but recieve coins in another type of coin of another protocol -like x11?
full member
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
I'm not clear about this calculation. Where's the price of DRK, FTC, LMR coming from?

Quote
that's a direct and simple conversion.

for example, you mine X11 and want to get paid in FTC

FTC amount = DRK amount * DRK price / FTC price + LMR amount * LMR price / FTC price

no exchanges involved

We're not using two different prices for each coin like you may think. You know, one price for buying and another for selling like an exchange. It's the same price with a simple and direct conversion.

best bid from all exchanges we support
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
I'm not clear about this calculation. Where's the price of DRK, FTC, LMR coming from?

Quote
that's a direct and simple conversion.

for example, you mine X11 and want to get paid in FTC

FTC amount = DRK amount * DRK price / FTC price + LMR amount * LMR price / FTC price

no exchanges involved

We're not using two different prices for each coin like you may think. You know, one price for buying and another for selling like an exchange. It's the same price with a simple and direct conversion.




member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10

we're now trying this implementation for algo switching:

- below 2%, no switch
- 2% ~15 minutes
  ...
- 50% ~2 minutes

----------

we just fixed that problem that caused many rejected submits. it appeared a few days ago. the same ntime was sent over in some situations.


Thank you for the update, yaamp team. Keep up the great work.
full member
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
do you guys suggest a longer time between switched? right now, i understand it's now switching a bit too often.

Optimal would be if the time to switch would be dynamic and calculated based on the difference in profitability.
So if you are mining X11 and X13 is more profitable by 2% then there is no need to switch fast. If X13 would become more profitable by 100% then it makes sense to switch quickly to X13.

we're now trying this implementation for algo switching:

- below 2%, no switch
- 2% ~15 minutes
  ...
- 50% ~2 minutes

----------

we just fixed that problem that caused many rejected submits. it appeared a few days ago. the same ntime was sent over in some situations.



member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Why is there such a big discrepancy between the estimated and actual profitability of neoscrypt coins?

I get the impression that there was some sort of coordinated attack against mining pools going on yesterday; both the YAAMP and Nicehash websites were going up and down intermittently (though staying down more than not), and even the stratum servers looked like they were crapping out every once in a while. The lower scores across the board probably reflect the turbulence.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Ok I learned to use c="coinname code" as a password. So we recieve payouts in our preffered coin type.
You should add these info, changing difficulties and anyother type of codes that to be used in password area; into homepage of Yaamp Wink
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
I'm just pointing my rented rig in your X11 pool.

My username is a CANN wallet
I thought that I will recieve that type of coins but I always see Mysterycoin in my wallet screen.

Is that normal? (I tried othey coin wallets also)

My second question is; which exchange rates you are using to convert?

http://i.imgur.com/Ljrqw2k.jpg
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Why is there such a big discrepancy between the estimated and actual profitability of neoscrypt coins?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
do you guys suggest a longer time between switched? right now, i understand it's now switching a bit too often.

Optimal would be if the time to switch would be dynamic and calculated based on the difference in profitability.
So if you are mining X11 and X13 is more profitable by 2% then there is no need to switch fast. If X13 would become more profitable by 100% then it makes sense to switch quickly to X13.

When I 1st started on yaamp last week it seemed to switch through the algos quite alot then slowed down and switched between a few less frequently. I assumed that my hashrate was being measured and then it moved to switching based on profitability. If thats the case I dont understand the need for an option to provide a "factor to normalize profitability" as documented on your yaamp's multi algo page? Anyway I have input my own factors as they are a bit different than the defaults just in case, eg my hashrate on quark is about 15 times what it is on lyra2.
Also my miner had a "sleep 10" on exit which delayed switching so I have comented that out and recompiled it, now for me switching incurrs little overhead.

before asking for change it would be handy to know what the current switching methodology is?
for reference this is what I use on linux:

while :
do
./ccminer -r 0 -a x11   -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:3533 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
./ccminer -r 0 -a x13   -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:3633 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
./ccminer -r 0 -a x14   -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:3933 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
./ccminer -r 0 -a x15   -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:3733 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
./ccminer -r 0 -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4433 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
../ccminer-1.5.31/ccminer -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4033 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
./ccminer -r 0 -a fresh -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4133 -u 1DQiMcgWVB8wwLWhwGZFkfjF1YhP5gQNFX -p x11=10.4,x13=7.9,x14=7.7,x15=6.8,quark=20,fresh=11,lyra2=1.3
done

As an aside there were some issues with 503 service not available on the website earlier this morning and the miner getting "connection refused", was there a DoS going on?
sr. member
Activity: 332
Merit: 250
do you guys suggest a longer time between switched? right now, i understand it's now switching a bit too often.

Optimal would be if the time to switch would be dynamic and calculated based on the difference in profitability.
So if you are mining X11 and X13 is more profitable by 2% then there is no need to switch fast. If X13 would become more profitable by 100% then it makes sense to switch quickly to X13.
full member
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
do you guys suggest a longer time between switched? right now, i understand it's now switching a bit too often.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Hmmm ...... Now everything works fine ..
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
I would like to know when finally will function normally switch between algorithms according to prescribed miner complexity in the "pass". Just at the moment of every 2 minutes miner switches to a different algorithm., And idle time of switching from 3 to 15 seconds. Waiting for an answer.

Algo switching works fine as far as I can see on my rigs.

I understand that it basically works, but not so. I ordered for example,
"pass": "x11 = 6, x13 = 3, x14 = 2, x15 = 2, neoscrypt = 0.15, quark = 2, lyra2 = 1"
A miner still switches between algorithms me every 3 minutes in a circle. And I told him clearly sets the priority of X11. I ask to clarify that it may have changed, and now we have a different register settings in the "pass" ??

from yaamp.com:
"Note that the password parameter must be all together, that is no spaces."

Of course, no spaces.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
I would like to know when finally will function normally switch between algorithms according to prescribed miner complexity in the "pass". Just at the moment of every 2 minutes miner switches to a different algorithm., And idle time of switching from 3 to 15 seconds. Waiting for an answer.

Algo switching works fine as far as I can see on my rigs.

I understand that it basically works, but not so. I ordered for example,
"pass": "x11=6,x13=3,x14=2,x15=2,neoscrypt=0.15,quark=2,lyra2=1"
A miner still switches between algorithms me every 3 minutes in a circle. And I told him clearly sets the priority of X11. I ask to clarify that it may have changed, and now we have a different register settings in the "pass" ??
Pages:
Jump to: