Anyway, agree.
Thank you for agreeing to this not easy task.
Actually, that is me agreeing that one person, me, holding the final say is not a good thing.
[...]
All of these, after they agreed on you, holydarkness, as the mediator.
I don't understand, are they backing out of their own decision to leave this matter to a mediator in the first place ?
I don't think so.
Though they previously mentioned that they're looking for an experienced mediator and is in touch with Betting Integrity Unit, and seemingly voted me and efialtis out, not long after I made my post regarding it, they reached to me again through PM.
The content of the PM is, naturally, can't be disclosed, but I think it's safe to tell the gist of it, that they're still interested to have me overseeing it, and that they're [at least the impression that I get] weighting my competence through several questions.
I am interested to know about your betting strategy, that you've keep tight in your pocket all this time, and that you claimed to be a proof of your innocence. Perhaps we can go with that? See if it put thing back in motion? Given this thread seemingly stuck on a point and didn't move in any direction.