Topic: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] - page 212. (Read 77449 times)

Fake, you mean like not having to irregular army corps fighting under RF command in the Donbas? "That type of fake"? Or is it more like the RF did not send troops to invade Crimea in 2014 - troops which would not even say who did they represent or on whose behalf were there?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Donbas_(2014–2022)#:~:text=Russia%20officially%20recognized%20the%20DPR,large-scale%20invasion%20of%20Ukraine.


It is just an expression. BA is learning Russian very fast to get the nationality and join the army of slave conscripts, so his English no longer as good.

It's mostly because you haven't removed it.

The cops haven't arrested me. Must be on good terms,

    

I am not sure why the comments like this are not deleted?
I believe you have good terms with authorities - that is why you suggest people this kind of act  ... Lets get back to the discussion everyone

This is a valid observation and did happen in the first few days or weeks of the 'special military operation' as well as long before.  For many years we've been inundated with fake stories that the Russians have crossed into Ukraine, or are amassing and are going to do so in a few minutes.  [Not unlike the decades of stories about how Iran will have nukes in a few months if we don't bomb them now.]  Then when the operation started there were tons of obviously fake and some pre-arranged/staged stories about the devastation and 'Russian tanks in Kiev' and what-not.  Within a few weeks credible info that yes, the Russians actually are doing something started to emerge.  At that point I shifted my hypotheses about what might be going on.


My car was missing a lot.  I estimated that the chances of defective plugs was 30% and the control computer 60%.  Roughly.  I still changed the plugs first.  Cost a few bucks and took a few minutes.  After observing the changes, I went ahead and obtained the $4000 control computer and put it in.  Did I 'fail' by putting in the plugs even if it didn't pay off?

The Russians obviously had no expectation of defeating Kiev (City) militarily with their initial actions.  Seems like they figured that there was some chance of collapsing the NaZiocon regime politically, and even if not, it 'pinned' some forces up North while they got what they really wanted down South.  They always knew that the cost would be minimal (and the pay-off high) if they just retreated at the right time.  And they did exactly that.  Kharkiv seems to be a similar situation.  A twist is that they retreat 'to far' and form a hell of a nice killing field which pays huge dividends, but much thanks for that must go to the Ukriod 'leadership' who seem to want dead Ukrainians more than they want dead Russians.  Northern Kherson is a textbook example of this phenomenon.

Most people these days are utterly incapable or making or even understanding what in times past would have been fairly simple plans/strategies such as the above.  It is what it is.


I've said that people who learned and adopted significant elements of Nazi ideology in schools and youth camps, lionize historical figures who significantly expressed such an ideology (e.g., Bandara), tattoo themselves with iconography associated with the ideology (e.g., swastikas), etc, are classifiable of Nazis, and the post 2014 coup government integrated persons who exhibit these characteristics.

I've said from day one that I believe that a majority of Ukrainians, including those conscripts who are currently been decimated as they are forced into suicidal attacks, and probably for the most part normal and decent people.

Nazi ideology as I define it is characterized by an embrace of political violence.  That would include such things as placing 'enemies' (e.g., real journalists, foreign politicians who don't support them, etc) on hit-lists for execution though to be fair, almost all totalitarian political entities share this characteristic and that certainly includes the Trotskyites who evolved into the modern day NaZiocons.  In many ways there is not much light between the two.

An interesting presentation I saw was that the OSS/CIA recognized the potential of the Ukriod Nazi elements of the Ukroid population as a thorn in the side to the Soviet Union fairly early and made them a deal:  We'll fund and support you but you have to do one thing:  Drop the Jew stuff.  Observations which lend credence to the suggestion include that the Ukroid Nazi's of today own their livelihood to Jewish oligarchs and the U.S. State Department, and display a fair bit of philosemitism.  And that they get the good-houskeeping seal of approval from likes of the ADL.


Have at it, Hos.

https://twitter.com/WarintheFuture/status/1586515795848626176

Another wall, another simple answer:

- Hope for liberty is never in vain. Fighting for liberty is possibly the only fight that makes sense for humans and, apart from mere survival, one of the few reasons to put your life on the line. This is over and over the same idea "surrender because you cannot win", which after what is happening in the fronts, makes no sense.

- The dam belongs to Ukraine, so it is Ukrainians dam. It is temporarily leased on favourable terms to the Slave Orc Army, but the Ukrainian army, after the advances in the las 5 days which all the trolls here are trying not to mention, is at 54 kilometres from it and about to evict the tenant for bad behaviour.  Destroying it would provide no benefit to Ukraine and would hinder the current offensive more than help.

- Meanwhile, the RF attacked the electrical infrastructure but seemed quite surprised to see their assets attacked at Sevastopol.

The "surrender" idea is each day more of a stupid argument, and while you can repeat it over and over, the fighting disproves completely the idea of the "invincible RF army" - more now becoming the "army from the 90's that showed its true pathetic capabilities".

I think that given your love for life and desire not to cause unnecessary suffering - how human of you - you should start addressing the Slave Orc Army to surrender to avoid getting burnt and blasted in their T-60s. Or is it that you only care about the "poor" Ukrainians?


Adolf Putin and his aggression of Ukraine does not represent any culture, certainly it does not represent any Eastern culture nor any of the achievement of the people of Russia and the regions and republics belonging to the RF. He is trying to be a page in history and he is using the people of the RF to achieve his egotistic and maniac purposes.

Killing is not a culture, mass-graving is not a culture, bombing civilians is not a culture. Adolf Putin is using the noble patriotism of the people from Russia to steal more and in a vain attempt to be anything else but a corrupted kleptocracy leader. He will only be a short paragraph in the books - he who finally showed that that the strength of Russia was there no-more.

USA, UK - what's the difference? In the aspect of Russophobia against the background of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, those and those Anglo-Saxons (as well as Australia, New Zealand and Canada, except for Quebec).

The attack on Nord Stream is more beneficial for the US than for the UK (because it seems that the UK also had a branch from one of the branches of the Nord Stream), but both could technically implement it. It’s bad that Russia was not allowed to investigate in hot pursuit, but the wreckage of an underwater drone from the bay of Sevastopol points to the UK, and that it was launched from a humanitarian corridor for the export of grain. In principle, nothing surprising, in Russia there is even a stable phraseological unit "aнгличaнкa гaдит".

Remember how Kremlin blamed the US for the Nordstream explosions? And the fifteen ruble brigade here proved it using tweets from some Polish dude and similar investigative tools.

Well, no one remembers that, not even Kremlin itself, because apparently that never happened. They've always known that Brits did it and Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. I wonder if posts will get deleted in this thread or some mental gymnastics will be employed to switch the narrative.

You argued there was no war, just like Putin. "It's all just fear mongering by the West."

You argued that Russia didn't fail in the spring when they went for Kiev and ended up retreating even after the pro war Russians were openly calling out Putin's failures.

You repeat the same “they're all Nazis" lines as Putin (although you add your own unironic antisemitic flare, to be fair)

Let me know if I should keep going.

Sure.  Most stuff is 'propaganda', but that doesn't mean it isn't factual.  Most reasonably competant propaganda has it's basis in factual information (as do most good troll posts).  The propagandist's trick is just how to spin it, what to leave out, etc.

I'll re-frame/relay factual stuff until the cows come home with no qualms and do so no matter what side it comes from.  That there is very little reliable fodder coming from the Ukroid/West side, that isn't my fault.

The primitive class of propaganda, which works on low-functioning people like you Ukroid/woke-redditard folks here, is the type where information is simply pulled straight out of the propagandist's ass with no basis in actual physical reality whatsoever.  Ghost-of-Kiev, Bucha, Mariupol mass-graves, Russians eating dogs which have been eating dead Russian soldiers, etc.  Again, the problem with that (even if one has no ethics) is that it works only partially against mainly useless NPCs and casts doubt on ALL information produced from the day one is proven to be a liar forward.  The recovery process takes years and a revolution or two which is why I don't hold 2020's Russians accountable for Soviet era reporting 'errors'.

You literally parrot back the propaganda on a regular basis in this thread.  You're doing it right now.

Count on it.  I've no doubt that as a national strategy the Russians do exactly this, targeting their own domestic populations, but I simply don't have much visibility into that dark corner.    I doubt that it is currently as pervasive now in Russia as it was under the Soviet Union or current day West (albeit often in reverse to facilitate 'demoralization' among the citizenry.)  Seems like the Russian people are maintaining a degree of intellect (and decency) while somehow it seems to be falling off the cliff in other formerly progressive areas like the 'collective West'.  Maybe the massive number of childhood injections are having something to do with that.  Who knows?  In any event, different methods of propaganda work better among different types of people.

What the Russians seem to be doing internationally is to be pretty careful to be factual without a lot opportunity for casual researchers to disprove their statements as flat out lies or ridiculous weasel words.  They seem to be smart enough to understand that the fallout from a bullshit lie is orders of magnitude more damaging than the benefit of some 'Ghost-of-Kiev' story which is believed by 50% of domestic mouth-breathers and assorted global redditards for a few days.  They can say something and it is more safe for an observer like me to take it as likely factual simply because of their recent history.

Ukraine, on the other hand, seems to be a nation of Baghdad Bobs.  And oddly proud of it!  I suspect that it is a result of being under operational control of those who are philosophically more influenced by Kabbalah.  Namely the Ziocons from the U.S. State Department which really took control after the coup of 2014.  Kabbalah teaches a concept of 'truth' which is 180 degrees different than most Christian and/or post-enlightenment interpretations.  Even Atheists like me who grew up in 'Christian nations' tend to have adopted the definition of 'truth' as being synonymous with 'factually accurate' and it takes a lot of time and study to realize that not everyone defines 'truth' in the same way.

A couple more telenovelas from the writers of amazing stories AKA Russian government:

• Russia is claiming that Ukraine is developing drone-delivered mosquito-borne biological weapons.
• Ukraine attacked Russian warships in Sevastopol. Russia is complaining to the UN about it. Must have forgotten that they're in a special-totally-not-war-operation.

If the American people ever saw through the US media regarding Ukraine and what the US government was doing over there, Americans would take out Biden, Pelosi and a whole bunch of war mongering Dems and companies.

Yeah I'm sure if Russia were to ever use propaganda to build National pride you'd be the first to criticize them. 

I am actually surprised that you find that wrong, after the fakes and false claims you are making in the forum LOL. You are such a cynic.

For example, one of your favourites here: it is much better to submit to Adolf Putin and wait for the order from Moscow to create a Holodomor, a new Chernobyl or to recruiting your young men by force to send them to his next war of aggression - "because if not it will be bad for them", do not tell people to resist because they get killed... Yes, you care so much for Ukrainians, so humanitarian... but at the same time Adolf Putin is doing what he must killing them, there is nothing wrong with that. Yeah... such a cynic.

I am not even sure if you are a cynic or you have been for so long under Adolf Putin's thumb that you have abandoned any hope of being free ever - that you have lost the ability to understand anything else but force and that you have become forever a willingly slave of the Kleptocrats. Get your pay.

BTW, if you change your trolling career, do not go into nationality guessing. Nor anything else for that matter petty farm-troll with a reduced area of something resembling a human brain.


BA, may I see the Pentagon document, publication, declaration or any other form of communication in which anyone of the right rank has expressed that there will be not restrictions on the use of the NA in case Putin does not pull out? I mean, unless this is as fake as everything else you write.

Also, same for any official source from the Pentagon speaking about bio-labs in Ukraine? Unless, fake-as-usual.

The US has been provoking Russia to start a nuclear war for years. But they have stepped up their prodding since Russia started its police action in Ukraine.

Putin is simply too smart to be provoked. So, the response from the US is that they, the US, will finally have to start it if Russia won't.

Btw, "It turns out that Trump was a peace-loving president, and it is Biden and his cronies that are desperate to hit the nuke button."


Pentagon lusts after nuclear war, says it will “nuke Russia” if Putin doesn’t pull out of Ukraine

These are Ukrainian power plants, so yes, "their own". However it still stinks of projection if you call them "russian". Russians are bombing Ukrainian electric supply infrastructure and are accusing Ukrainians of thinking about doing the same.


Brush up on English grammar, comrade. Your question was asked and answered in present tense. If you want to engage in conjecture, I'm more that happy to let you talk about May 9 parades and other stuff that we can laugh about a few months later.

Talking about tactical nukes and accusing me of propaganda LOL

Problem with that line of thinking is that any propaganda can be justified as "hope". How you'll be judged depends on the outcome of the conflict, if your side wins you're praised for lifting the moral and for encouraging fighters towards a quicker victory, if your side loses then you were spreading propaganda were enabler and responsible for more senseless deaths of the naive that actually believed you. Of course propagandists always retort that with "at least it saved the earth/galaxy/universe which would otherwise surely be destroyed next", which of course is unverifiable and just a slippery slope argument.

If radioactive substance == nuclear weapons then


I like how you conveniently leave out that "their own" hydro and nuclear plants, are actually fully controlled and claimed by Russia to now be totally Russian and don't provide any electricity to Ukraine anymore. But your target audience don't really need to know these inconvenient facts at all right? Why even attempt to be objective when you can just keep on pushing your agenda.

See it's only a loaded question for people spreading propaganda, as by definition they can't even discuss negative outcomes or the precursors to them, where objective people can discuss anything. I for one can and did easily state that if Ukraine in total is still taking land in January, Russia might be loosing, or if Ukraine gets tanks and trillions in new commitment to counter RU mobilization (instead of just warm scarfs, gloves and more ammo) it's another indicator of escalation to which RU's only options are either a tactical nuclear response or a total collapse. See how easy it is when you're not just spreading propaganda?

Well, of course. Now that the word "terrorism" has been popularized, everybody can use it, right? What counts is how stupid people are, when they listen to the loudest media.