Pages:
Author

Topic: sawdice the New Age of Dice - Let's play a game. - page 15. (Read 27098 times)

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
if they were a scam i dont think they would give news about their website and problems they have


Why not? They almost never just say "OK, you were right, it was a scam". There are always vaguely plausible excuses: "a rogue employee deployed a nonce-skipper", "transaction maleability drained the cold wallets", "our site was hacked", etc. dice.ninja was the cleanest in that respect - they just disappeared one day and that was that.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
everyday getting closer to seeing if site is a scam or not




new crypto gambling site owners prey that dooglus doesnt check out their site and then post about it in thread.

as soon as dooglus does, the scammers knows it's over for them
if they were a scam i dont think they would give news about their website and problems they have

Thats not true in all cases. Dadice is a clear example of that. We can just wait and see what they change once they resume their site.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
everyday getting closer to seeing if site is a scam or not




new crypto gambling site owners prey that dooglus doesnt check out their site and then post about it in thread.

as soon as dooglus does, the scammers knows it's over for them
if they were a scam i dont think they would give news about their website and problems they have
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
everyday getting closer to seeing if site is a scam or not




new crypto gambling site owners prey that dooglus doesnt check out their site and then post about it in thread.

as soon as dooglus does, the scammers knows it's over for them
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
We have temporarily stopped the website until we fix the issues that was mentioned here over the past 2 days.
and we are very thankful to everyone who pointed to those issues and helped us to improve and develop the site.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
I wonder if this is just temporary, or if there is a legitimate issue with sawdice? I'm going to go out on a limb and guess there's been no official statement about it yet anywhere.

But coming so close to the deadline for them to prove their cold storages, and the end of the 0% house edge...eh...

There's clearly a legitimate issue with them... they have no limit on how much you can bet, but had admitted to having less than 1000 BTC available to pay out winners with.

So by their own admission they are happy to accept bets which they know in advance they have no way of paying out if you happen to win.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
sawdice is down at my side at the moment i am unable to access the website i am getting this message Error! Can't load active theme. is that only for me or anyone else having this problem to access the website or maybe that site has problem to load the theme to access there.



I wonder if this is just temporary, or if there is a legitimate issue with sawdice? I'm going to go out on a limb and guess there's been no official statement about it yet anywhere.

But coming so close to the deadline for them to prove their cold storages, and the end of the 0% house edge...eh...
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
sawdice is down at my side at the moment i am unable to access the website i am getting this message Error! Can't load active theme. is that only for me or anyone else having this problem to access the website or maybe that site has problem to load the theme to access there.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1005
After having read all the comments I would say missing of cold wallet and unlimited betting option these two things are really very disturbing and illogical even after so much discussion.OP should make these valid points raised by various respected members clear and satisfy them as soon as possible.I will deposit a little after all will be settled down in fair and clear way.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Zero house edge this is something unique, i am gonna try, lets see how its goes.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
Actually that "5 figure" seems like a typo..
* the cold storage is just 3 figures not 5 figures ( sorry my mistake i typed the wrong number )
Pretty sure that even 999 coins is still risky to cover 20 coin bets, but let's wait for the cold storage wallet and we can consider it from there.
That's gotta be a flat-out lie. Even mis-typing 1 digit off I would feel like it was a lie, but you don't accidentally claim that it was 5 figures and then backtrack when called out...

about your last point ( which we claim to have a fantastic provably fair method )
yes we have the best provably fair method
Lol, nope. You most certainly do not.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
Actually that "5 figure" seems like a typo..
* the cold storage is just 3 figures not 5 figures ( sorry my mistake i typed the wrong number )
Even if you have 999 coins, you can def. not offer "no maximum bet". Just-Dice used to have 100-200 coin bets like it was no big deal and even 20-30 coin bets would be too risky. But let's wait for the cold storage wallet and we can consider it from there.

For your points 1-2-3 i don't see any problems
I didn't mean to say that the first 3 points were bad. I meant to say that they do not seem to be consistent with using a script that has many accusations of backdoors in it. In my estimation someone with decent money would in fact make their own script from scratch (with some trusted opensource frameworks) or at least not base their site on -that- script. But if you do feel comfortable using that script, that's your choice I guess.

about your last point ( which we claim to have a fantastic provably fair method )
yes we have the best provably fair method
As emphasized by dooglus, this is absolutely not true. Your lack of knowledge about the provably fair mechanism is slightly concerning.



edit: I thought they had a max of 20 coin bets, but actually they have no limit in max bet - which is rather impossible "even" with a 3 figure bankroll.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
The fact that they're intentionally delaying giving out the cold storage wallet (well, there's no real valid reason for a delay) sets off massive alarm bells already. It's not exactly something that requires you to make lots of database queries and spend hours upon hours finding, is it?

I guess it's possible their 5 figure sum of BTC is split over 1000 different paper wallets, and it was going to take them 2 or 3 days to collect it all into a single address, but it's been long enough now that at least some kind of update would be useful.

Well, did you store JD's BTC cold storage over 1000 different paper wallets? Wink Perhaps in a very distant world that could be possible...but you'd think even then that they would have collected it all up before announcing their site or at least offered an explanation, right?

The 1st of June is rapidly approaching...let's see what happens!
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
The fact that they're intentionally delaying giving out the cold storage wallet (well, there's no real valid reason for a delay) sets off massive alarm bells already. It's not exactly something that requires you to make lots of database queries and spend hours upon hours finding, is it?

I guess it's possible their 5 figure sum of BTC is split over 1000 different paper wallets, and it was going to take them 2 or 3 days to collect it all into a single address, but it's been long enough now that at least some kind of update would be useful.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
we do not have any maximum bet limits or deposit / withdraw limits

So you currently have 0% house edge, and no maximum bet?

That sounds like a remarkably risky thing to offer.

If you weren't a totally unknown entity you could find yourself with some huge whales on your hands.

True its a bit risky for now since we have zero house edge, but this is how dice works, one day you win, one day you lose.
the game operators risks as much as anyone else.
As the great Dalai Lama said : Great achievements involve great risks. 


I am considering betting on your site with some larger (but not huge) amounts; can you provide proof of solvency (ie: an address which proves that you have a real/proper/significant bankroll)?



We will provide our cold storage wallet in few days.

3 days has passed but the cold wallet address is still no where to be seen. What is taking you so long?

The fact that they're intentionally delaying giving out the cold storage wallet (well, there's no real valid reason for a delay) sets off massive alarm bells already. It's not exactly something that requires you to make lots of database queries and spend hours upon hours finding, is it?
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
we do not have any maximum bet limits or deposit / withdraw limits

So you currently have 0% house edge, and no maximum bet?

That sounds like a remarkably risky thing to offer.

If you weren't a totally unknown entity you could find yourself with some huge whales on your hands.

True its a bit risky for now since we have zero house edge, but this is how dice works, one day you win, one day you lose.
the game operators risks as much as anyone else.
As the great Dalai Lama said : Great achievements involve great risks. 


I am considering betting on your site with some larger (but not huge) amounts; can you provide proof of solvency (ie: an address which proves that you have a real/proper/significant bankroll)?



We will provide our cold storage wallet in few days.

3 days has passed but the cold wallet address is still no where to be seen. What is taking you so long?
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1117
Bug or something like it:
I betted at 71%, and it always gave me back 0,2 bits even if loss, now I cannot even call for faucet because it's not 0.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
We will provide our cold storage wallet in few days.

There is absolutely no reason that you should be waiting to provide your cold storage wallet, other than some fishy excuse. Why are you waiting a few days to do something that would take 30-60 seconds? That's unreasonable and the only thing I can think of is that you're planning to make a runner with the deposited BTC.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
about your last point ( which we claim to have a fantastic provably fair method )
yes we have the best provably fair method , we did our best to make our provably fair at most transparency, not like all the other site

You have to be joking. Your system is among the worst I've seen. Imagine being a player on your site, and wanting to make 100 provably fair bets. How much work would they have to do? They would have to note 100 different server seed hashes, change their client seed 100 times, verify 100 server seed hashes, and verify 100 rolls. That's so much work that literally nobody is going to do it.

Compare that with a site like Just-Dice where each player gets a single pair of seeds (one server seed hash, one client seed). They make 100 bets, then chose to reveal the server seed and can verify all 100 bets with a single click.

For you to claim that your system is somehow better than that is beyond belief. No sane person could compare the too and find your to be better.

To address your 4 points:

Quote
How sawdice provably fair system makes it special ?[/b]
Most other dice games who claim that they provely (?) fair while they are not, they do some tricks to cheat the players, here is some of them :
1 ) some dice games do provide you with the server seed in sha256 hashed format, but they never provide you the unhashed server after you play.
2 ) some others do not provide you with the hashed server seed and they only provide it after you play.
3 ) some others do not allow you to change your client seed so they force a client seed that makes the result known to them even before you bet.
4) some others tell you that the server seed will not be published till some time later after you bet.
all those tricks are done at many of the dice games websites but not at SawDice, our system is free of all those ticks and any tricks to cheat our players and make it a truly fair.

1. if a site doesn't provide the server seed ever, then it isn't provably fair
2. if a site doesn't provide the server seed hash, then it isn't provably fair
3. if a site doesn't let the client set the client seed, then it isn't provably fair
4. publishing the server seed after you bet is the only time to publish it. if you publish it before, the player can cheat. but forcing it to be changed after every single bet makes verification too much work for the user. it's better to let the user decide when to change it.

As usual, NLNico's point were right, and I'm pretty much just repeating them.





yeah doog thanks for repeating nico's points.



doog have you tried the 0% edge? site looks nice . they should come out will info / would get them more players
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
about your last point ( which we claim to have a fantastic provably fair method )
yes we have the best provably fair method , we did our best to make our provably fair at most transparency, not like all the other site

You have to be joking. Your system is among the worst I've seen. Imagine being a player on your site, and wanting to make 100 provably fair bets. How much work would they have to do? They would have to note 100 different server seed hashes, change their client seed 100 times, verify 100 server seed hashes, and verify 100 rolls. That's so much work that literally nobody is going to do it.

Compare that with a site like Just-Dice where each player gets a single pair of seeds (one server seed hash, one client seed). They make 100 bets, then chose to reveal the server seed and can verify all 100 bets with a single click.

For you to claim that your system is somehow better than that is beyond belief. No sane person could compare the too and find your to be better.

To address your 4 points:

Quote
How sawdice provably fair system makes it special ?[/b]
Most other dice games who claim that they provely (?) fair while they are not, they do some tricks to cheat the players, here is some of them :
1 ) some dice games do provide you with the server seed in sha256 hashed format, but they never provide you the unhashed server after you play.
2 ) some others do not provide you with the hashed server seed and they only provide it after you play.
3 ) some others do not allow you to change your client seed so they force a client seed that makes the result known to them even before you bet.
4) some others tell you that the server seed will not be published till some time later after you bet.
all those tricks are done at many of the dice games websites but not at SawDice, our system is free of all those ticks and any tricks to cheat our players and make it a truly fair.

1. if a site doesn't provide the server seed ever, then it isn't provably fair
2. if a site doesn't provide the server seed hash, then it isn't provably fair
3. if a site doesn't let the client set the client seed, then it isn't provably fair
4. publishing the server seed after you bet is the only time to publish it. if you publish it before, the player can cheat. but forcing it to be changed after every single bet makes verification too much work for the user. it's better to let the user decide when to change it.

As usual, NLNico's point were right, and I'm pretty much just repeating them.
Pages:
Jump to: