Scientific proof that God exists? - page 34.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 06:36:28 PM

Quote from: BADecker on October 18, 2018, 06:27:01 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 03:16:40 PM

''Because that's all we know about outside the universe... not two outside-the-universes'' Do you realize how stupid this is? So the universe is just one, therefore inside the universe only 1 thing can exist? How come we have trillions of planets then?

What do you think outside the universe actually means? I don't think you really know, do you? Science doesn't even know if such thing exists but there are some theories, some of them even state that multiple universes exist so how can you claim it's only 1 god that created this universe and not multiple?

Standard Astargath attempted deception. We know nothing about outside-the-universe. We know a lot about the universe (though only a fraction of things that are within). Did you get that? We know one thing about outside-the-universe. What is that one thing? That it is outside the universe. We don't know if it is complex or simple. We don't know if it has anything that we can understand or not. What we do know is one thing... outside-the-universe... one. That is, unlike within-the-universe, which we know there are many things, we don't know anything about without except that it is outside-the-universe, one thing.

You are right. Understanding what outside the universe really means is something people don't know. If they did, it would be part of the universe, like inside the universe. But, we know that the universe was made by something other than itself. Since it isn't in the universe, it is outside the universe.

When you get out there, count the things that are out there for us all... if you can even understand it. So far it is only one... outside the universe.

Cool

''We know one thing about outside-the-universe. What is that one thing? That it is outside the universe. '' We don't. We actually don't know if ''outside the universe'' exists or not.

''Understanding what outside the universe really means is something people don't know. If they did, it would be part of the universe'' Understanding what's outside the universe doesn't magically make it part of our universe.

Whatever made the universe isn't wasn't within the universe when it made the universe. So, it was outside the universe. So, outside the universe exists... although the way that it might exist doesn't necessarily fit the word "exist."

If we can understand it according to universe stuff, it is universe stuff.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 18, 2018, 06:27:01 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 03:16:40 PM

''Because that's all we know about outside the universe... not two outside-the-universes'' Do you realize how stupid this is? So the universe is just one, therefore inside the universe only 1 thing can exist? How come we have trillions of planets then?

What do you think outside the universe actually means? I don't think you really know, do you? Science doesn't even know if such thing exists but there are some theories, some of them even state that multiple universes exist so how can you claim it's only 1 god that created this universe and not multiple?

Standard Astargath attempted deception. We know nothing about outside-the-universe. We know a lot about the universe (though only a fraction of things that are within). Did you get that? We know one thing about outside-the-universe. What is that one thing? That it is outside the universe. We don't know if it is complex or simple. We don't know if it has anything that we can understand or not. What we do know is one thing... outside-the-universe... one. That is, unlike within-the-universe, which we know there are many things, we don't know anything about without except that it is outside-the-universe, one thing.

You are right. Understanding what outside the universe really means is something people don't know. If they did, it would be part of the universe, like inside the universe. But, we know that the universe was made by something other than itself. Since it isn't in the universe, it is outside the universe.

When you get out there, count the things that are out there for us all... if you can even understand it. So far it is only one... outside the universe.

Cool

''We know one thing about outside-the-universe. What is that one thing? That it is outside the universe. '' We don't. We actually don't know if ''outside the universe'' exists or not.

''Understanding what outside the universe really means is something people don't know. If they did, it would be part of the universe'' Understanding what's outside the universe doesn't magically make it part of our universe.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 03:16:40 PM

''Because that's all we know about outside the universe... not two outside-the-universes'' Do you realize how stupid this is? So the universe is just one, therefore inside the universe only 1 thing can exist? How come we have trillions of planets then?

What do you think outside the universe actually means? I don't think you really know, do you? Science doesn't even know if such thing exists but there are some theories, some of them even state that multiple universes exist so how can you claim it's only 1 god that created this universe and not multiple?

Standard Astargath attempted deception. We know nothing about outside-the-universe. We know a lot about the universe (though only a fraction of things that are within). Did you get that? We know one thing about outside-the-universe. What is that one thing? That it is outside the universe. We don't know if it is complex or simple. We don't know if it has anything that we can understand or not. What we do know is one thing... outside-the-universe... one. That is, unlike within-the-universe, which we know there are many things, we don't know anything about without except that it is outside-the-universe, one thing.

You are right. Understanding what outside the universe really means is something people don't know. If they did, it would be part of the universe, like inside the universe. But, we know that the universe was made by something other than itself. Since it isn't in the universe, it is outside the universe.

When you get out there, count the things that are out there for us all... if you can even understand it. So far it is only one... outside the universe.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 18, 2018, 02:21:51 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 07:52:26 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 18, 2018, 06:05:59 AM

Yes, I can prove just one "thing." The "thing" is outside-the-universe. If we were able to understand it as more than one thing, it would be part of the universe, simply by the fact of us being able to understand it that sufficiently.

What does this mean? It means that if you and I were in that outside-the-universe "realm," and we were part of it enough that we could understand it, there might be countless "things" that we would "see" and understand. But since we are not "out there," and don't have any understanding whatsoever of "it," the only thing we know is one "thing"... outside-the-universe.

The only two ways that this can be different are:
1. The universe Maker in some way allows information about outside-the-universe to come to us inside the universe, thereby telling us what the situation is outside-the-universe;
2. We find something within the universe that shows that the universe spontaneously made itself.

Number 1 is a religious idea, and would only be part of this topic if the OP and title had set it up that way. But it is easy to start other topics.

Number 2 is something that we have no example of even within the universe. Everything within the universe is made by something else. Just the idea of something spontaneously making itself doesn't fit with anything that we know. C&E is part of the example of this. So, there is no way to show that the universe might have made itself. Saying such would be directing towards a religion or philosophical thing.

Since I have said all this before, I have something to thank you for. The fact that you ask the question again, shows that my previous explanations weren't clear enough for you. And if they weren't clear enough for you, they probably weren't clear enough for at least a few other people, as well. So, you have given me chance to clarify. And every time I get to clarify, I get the way to explain situated in my mind. So, thank you for this.

Cool

Uhmm ....... ok ....... badecker, are you ok? I know at this point you have to desperately try to say something but come on.

We don't know what's outside the universe, then how can you claim it was god who created the universe if god should be outside the universe? Does the outside of the universe only allow room for 1 god? This is not proving that the universe wasn't caused by multiple causes, your argument is still bad.

Thank you for maintaining the science aspect of this thread, rather than applying number 1 that I said above.

Please explain, further, what you mean. After all, I answered what your questions seem to be, in my post you quoted, above.

What's outside the universe? God is outside the universe. Why is God One? Because that's all we know about outside the universe... not two outside-the-universes, but only the one outside-the-universe.

Cool

''Because that's all we know about outside the universe... not two outside-the-universes'' Do you realize how stupid this is? So the universe is just one, therefore inside the universe only 1 thing can exist? How come we have trillions of planets then?

What do you think outside the universe actually means? I don't think you really know, do you? Science doesn't even know if such thing exists but there are some theories, some of them even state that multiple universes exist so how can you claim it's only 1 god that created this universe and not multiple?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 07:52:26 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 18, 2018, 06:05:59 AM

Yes, I can prove just one "thing." The "thing" is outside-the-universe. If we were able to understand it as more than one thing, it would be part of the universe, simply by the fact of us being able to understand it that sufficiently.

What does this mean? It means that if you and I were in that outside-the-universe "realm," and we were part of it enough that we could understand it, there might be countless "things" that we would "see" and understand. But since we are not "out there," and don't have any understanding whatsoever of "it," the only thing we know is one "thing"... outside-the-universe.

The only two ways that this can be different are:
1. The universe Maker in some way allows information about outside-the-universe to come to us inside the universe, thereby telling us what the situation is outside-the-universe;
2. We find something within the universe that shows that the universe spontaneously made itself.

Number 1 is a religious idea, and would only be part of this topic if the OP and title had set it up that way. But it is easy to start other topics.

Number 2 is something that we have no example of even within the universe. Everything within the universe is made by something else. Just the idea of something spontaneously making itself doesn't fit with anything that we know. C&E is part of the example of this. So, there is no way to show that the universe might have made itself. Saying such would be directing towards a religion or philosophical thing.

Since I have said all this before, I have something to thank you for. The fact that you ask the question again, shows that my previous explanations weren't clear enough for you. And if they weren't clear enough for you, they probably weren't clear enough for at least a few other people, as well. So, you have given me chance to clarify. And every time I get to clarify, I get the way to explain situated in my mind. So, thank you for this.

Cool

Uhmm ....... ok ....... badecker, are you ok? I know at this point you have to desperately try to say something but come on.

We don't know what's outside the universe, then how can you claim it was god who created the universe if god should be outside the universe? Does the outside of the universe only allow room for 1 god? This is not proving that the universe wasn't caused by multiple causes, your argument is still bad.

Thank you for maintaining the science aspect of this thread, rather than applying number 1 that I said above.

Please explain, further, what you mean. After all, I answered what your questions seem to be, in my post you quoted, above.

What's outside the universe? God is outside the universe. Why is God One? Because that's all we know about outside the universe... not two outside-the-universes, but only the one outside-the-universe.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 18, 2018, 06:05:59 AM

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 05:16:33 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 05:11:56 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 17, 2018, 11:15:43 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 07:25:00 AM

But the funniest part of everything you say is that you seem to think that this is a personal thing. What's the matter? Don't you like me because I show you science that you can't refute? Don't you think that enough people already know that you are a deceitful troll? Or are you simply subtly putting your resumé out there for anybody who wants to hire a freelance troll? Do you think they will hire you when you troll around this way? Get back on topic, hey?

All the scientific proof that anybody needs to know that God exists is right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Cool

You were never able to prove the cause of the universe is one thing and not multiple, it's as simple as that to disprove your whole argument. Unless you can prove the universe requires only 1 cause or 1 god instead of multiple your argument fails.

There you go. Getting silly again (Did you ever stop being silly?).

Since we don't know anything about outside-the-universe, the one thing that made the universe is Outside-The-Universe. But you knew that, because I already explained it to you. However, thank you for requesting this info again, for the benefit of those who haven't seen it already.

Cool

How does that answer the question of multiple causes? The thing or things that made the universe are outside the universe, the question is, can you prove it's just 1 ''thing'' and not multiple?

Yes, I can prove just one "thing." The "thing" is outside-the-universe. If we were able to understand it as more than one thing, it would be part of the universe, simply by the fact of us being able to understand it that sufficiently.

What does this mean? It means that if you and I were in that outside-the-universe "realm," and we were part of it enough that we could understand it, there might be countless "things" that we would "see" and understand. But since we are not "out there," and don't have any understanding whatsoever of "it," the only thing we know is one "thing"... outside-the-universe.

The only two ways that this can be different are:
1. The universe Maker in some way allows information about outside-the-universe to come to us inside the universe, thereby telling us what the situation is outside-the-universe;
2. We find something within the universe that shows that the universe spontaneously made itself.

Number 1 is a religious idea, and would only be part of this topic if the OP and title had set it up that way. But it is easy to start other topics.

Number 2 is something that we have no example of even within the universe. Everything within the universe is made by something else. Just the idea of something spontaneously making itself doesn't fit with anything that we know. C&E is part of the example of this. So, there is no way to show that the universe might have made itself. Saying such would be directing towards a religion or philosophical thing.

Since I have said all this before, I have something to thank you for. The fact that you ask the question again, shows that my previous explanations weren't clear enough for you. And if they weren't clear enough for you, they probably weren't clear enough for at least a few other people, as well. So, you have given me chance to clarify. And every time I get to clarify, I get the way to explain situated in my mind. So, thank you for this.

Cool

Uhmm ....... ok ....... badecker, are you ok? I know at this point you have to desperately try to say something but come on.

We don't know what's outside the universe, then how can you claim it was god who created the universe if god should be outside the universe? Does the outside of the universe only allow room for 1 god? This is not proving that the universe wasn't caused by multiple causes, your argument is still bad.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 18, 2018, 05:16:33 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 05:11:56 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 17, 2018, 11:15:43 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 07:25:00 AM

But the funniest part of everything you say is that you seem to think that this is a personal thing. What's the matter? Don't you like me because I show you science that you can't refute? Don't you think that enough people already know that you are a deceitful troll? Or are you simply subtly putting your resumé out there for anybody who wants to hire a freelance troll? Do you think they will hire you when you troll around this way? Get back on topic, hey?

All the scientific proof that anybody needs to know that God exists is right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Cool

You were never able to prove the cause of the universe is one thing and not multiple, it's as simple as that to disprove your whole argument. Unless you can prove the universe requires only 1 cause or 1 god instead of multiple your argument fails.

There you go. Getting silly again (Did you ever stop being silly?).

Since we don't know anything about outside-the-universe, the one thing that made the universe is Outside-The-Universe. But you knew that, because I already explained it to you. However, thank you for requesting this info again, for the benefit of those who haven't seen it already.

Cool

How does that answer the question of multiple causes? The thing or things that made the universe are outside the universe, the question is, can you prove it's just 1 ''thing'' and not multiple?

Yes, I can prove just one "thing." The "thing" is outside-the-universe. If we were able to understand it as more than one thing, it would be part of the universe, simply by the fact of us being able to understand it that sufficiently.

What does this mean? It means that if you and I were in that outside-the-universe "realm," and we were part of it enough that we could understand it, there might be countless "things" that we would "see" and understand. But since we are not "out there," and don't have any understanding whatsoever of "it," the only thing we know is one "thing"... outside-the-universe.

The only two ways that this can be different are:
1. The universe Maker in some way allows information about outside-the-universe to come to us inside the universe, thereby telling us what the situation is outside-the-universe;
2. We find something within the universe that shows that the universe spontaneously made itself.

Number 1 is a religious idea, and would only be part of this topic if the OP and title had set it up that way. But it is easy to start other topics.

Number 2 is something that we have no example of even within the universe. Everything within the universe is made by something else. Just the idea of something spontaneously making itself doesn't fit with anything that we know. C&E is part of the example of this. So, there is no way to show that the universe might have made itself. Saying such would be directing towards a religion or philosophical thing.

Since I have said all this before, I have something to thank you for. The fact that you ask the question again, shows that my previous explanations weren't clear enough for you. And if they weren't clear enough for you, they probably weren't clear enough for at least a few other people, as well. So, you have given me chance to clarify. And every time I get to clarify, I get the way to explain situated in my mind. So, thank you for this.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 05:11:56 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 17, 2018, 11:15:43 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 07:25:00 AM

But the funniest part of everything you say is that you seem to think that this is a personal thing. What's the matter? Don't you like me because I show you science that you can't refute? Don't you think that enough people already know that you are a deceitful troll? Or are you simply subtly putting your resumé out there for anybody who wants to hire a freelance troll? Do you think they will hire you when you troll around this way? Get back on topic, hey?

All the scientific proof that anybody needs to know that God exists is right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Cool

You were never able to prove the cause of the universe is one thing and not multiple, it's as simple as that to disprove your whole argument. Unless you can prove the universe requires only 1 cause or 1 god instead of multiple your argument fails.

There you go. Getting silly again (Did you ever stop being silly?).

Since we don't know anything about outside-the-universe, the one thing that made the universe is Outside-The-Universe. But you knew that, because I already explained it to you. However, thank you for requesting this info again, for the benefit of those who haven't seen it already.

Cool

How does that answer the question of multiple causes? The thing or things that made the universe are outside the universe, the question is, can you prove it's just 1 ''thing'' and not multiple?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 17, 2018, 11:15:43 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 07:25:00 AM

But the funniest part of everything you say is that you seem to think that this is a personal thing. What's the matter? Don't you like me because I show you science that you can't refute? Don't you think that enough people already know that you are a deceitful troll? Or are you simply subtly putting your resumé out there for anybody who wants to hire a freelance troll? Do you think they will hire you when you troll around this way? Get back on topic, hey?

All the scientific proof that anybody needs to know that God exists is right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Cool

You were never able to prove the cause of the universe is one thing and not multiple, it's as simple as that to disprove your whole argument. Unless you can prove the universe requires only 1 cause or 1 god instead of multiple your argument fails.

There you go. Getting silly again (Did you ever stop being silly?).

Since we don't know anything about outside-the-universe, the one thing that made the universe is Outside-The-Universe. But you knew that, because I already explained it to you. However, thank you for requesting this info again, for the benefit of those who haven't seen it already.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 17, 2018, 07:25:00 AM

Quote from: Astargath on October 16, 2018, 12:21:50 PM

Quote from: BADecker on October 16, 2018, 10:36:02 AM

Thank you for acknowledging that God exists. Cool

By ignoring the scientific evidence you are acknowledging that the bible is a hoax, thank you for that. - Blah, blah, blah. By ignoring the scientific evidence you are acknowledging that the Bible is fact.

Age of the earth: - Not known scientifically. The scientific writings about the age of the earth all tell you this right inside themselves, by the language they use, though many of them don't say it outright. It's in the way they talk about their findings regarding the age of the earth.
https://www.space.com/24854-how-old-is-earth.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Age of the universe: - Not known scientifically. The scientific writings about the age of the universe all tell you this right inside themselves, by the language they use, though many of them don't say it outright. It's in the way they talk about their findings regarding the age of the universe.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/04/29/how-do-we-know-the-age-of-the-universe/#473db16a6155
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe

This is scientific proof, accepted by virtually all scientists, if this is not proof, I don't know what is. - Scientists are people. Simple acceptance of something by a bunch of people doesn't make it factual. However, the idea that "... accepted by virtually all scientists ..." is accurate is entirely too generalized, and is completely wrong because of this. Sounds like you don't know what proof really is.

There is also plenty of evidence that the flood didn't happen, in fact no history book talks about it anywhere. - Now you are getting really goofy. The greatest history book of all - the Bible - talks about the flood. In addition, there is a lot of written history about the Great Flood. One very common ancient written record about it besides the Bible, is the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh.

https://www.csicop.org/si/show/twenty-one_reasons_noahs_worldwide_flood_never_happened
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_flood

Rip badecker.

But the funniest part of everything you say is that you seem to think that this is a personal thing. What's the matter? Don't you like me because I show you science that you can't refute? Don't you think that enough people already know that you are a deceitful troll? Or are you simply subtly putting your resumé out there for anybody who wants to hire a freelance troll? Do you think they will hire you when you troll around this way? Get back on topic, hey?

All the scientific proof that anybody needs to know that God exists is right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Cool

You were never able to prove the cause of the universe is one thing and not multiple, it's as simple as that to disprove your whole argument. Unless you can prove the universe requires only 1 cause or 1 god instead of multiple your argument fails.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

There can be no proof since you cannot test a god... much less repeatedly. Cool

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 16, 2018, 12:21:50 PM

Quote from: BADecker on October 16, 2018, 10:36:02 AM

Thank you for acknowledging that God exists. Cool

By ignoring the scientific evidence you are acknowledging that the bible is a hoax, thank you for that. - Blah, blah, blah. By ignoring the scientific evidence you are acknowledging that the Bible is fact.

Age of the earth: - Not known scientifically. The scientific writings about the age of the earth all tell you this right inside themselves, by the language they use, though many of them don't say it outright. It's in the way they talk about their findings regarding the age of the earth.
https://www.space.com/24854-how-old-is-earth.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Age of the universe: - Not known scientifically. The scientific writings about the age of the universe all tell you this right inside themselves, by the language they use, though many of them don't say it outright. It's in the way they talk about their findings regarding the age of the universe.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/04/29/how-do-we-know-the-age-of-the-universe/#473db16a6155
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe

This is scientific proof, accepted by virtually all scientists, if this is not proof, I don't know what is. - Scientists are people. Simple acceptance of something by a bunch of people doesn't make it factual. However, the idea that "... accepted by virtually all scientists ..." is accurate is entirely too generalized, and is completely wrong because of this. Sounds like you don't know what proof really is.

There is also plenty of evidence that the flood didn't happen, in fact no history book talks about it anywhere. - Now you are getting really goofy. The greatest history book of all - the Bible - talks about the flood. In addition, there is a lot of written history about the Great Flood. One very common ancient written record about it besides the Bible, is the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh.

https://www.csicop.org/si/show/twenty-one_reasons_noahs_worldwide_flood_never_happened
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_flood

Rip badecker.

But the funniest part of everything you say is that you seem to think that this is a personal thing. What's the matter? Don't you like me because I show you science that you can't refute? Don't you think that enough people already know that you are a deceitful troll? Or are you simply subtly putting your resumé out there for anybody who wants to hire a freelance troll? Do you think they will hire you when you troll around this way? Get back on topic, hey?

All the scientific proof that anybody needs to know that God exists is right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.

Cool

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Vod on October 16, 2018, 01:46:54 PM

Everything that BADecker thinks and types is based off the bible.

The bible has been proven to not be about a man that died in 0AD.

Everything in the bible is a lie.

Cool

You forgot to check the things that BADecker types against the Bible.

The Bible is definitely not about some guy who died in 0AD.

Everything in the Bible is truth. But you have to read the Bible to see what it says about the way the things that it says are truthful.

That being said, it sounds like you are among those who want to turn this topic into a religious topic, rather than the scientific topic that the title and OP express it to be. Or are you trying to tell us that science is a religion?

Cool

metall140s

member

Activity: 238

Merit: 14

I think that the question is very interesting and i am interested in reading as many opinions as possible.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Everything that BADecker thinks and types is based off the bible.

The bible has been proven to not be about a man that died in 0AD.

Everything in the bible is a lie.

Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 16, 2018, 10:36:02 AM

Quote from: Astargath on October 16, 2018, 05:45:40 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 15, 2018, 09:16:02 PM

Quote from: Vod on October 13, 2018, 02:59:38 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 13, 2018, 02:20:14 PM

The God that the Bible is referring to is the God of the universe that science has proven to exist.

Then why was the bible written at least 80 years after this god died?

Five + generations of people forget about this god, then suddenly many people remember in great detail. Roll Eyes

The bible is a work of fiction.

God didn't die.

People like you simply focused away from God, so He revealed Himself over and over, again and again so that some of them could be saved.

The Bible is the greatest truth.

Cool

Proved scientifically that the bible is false ^^ ^^^

Thank you for acknowledging that God exists. Cool

By ignoring the scientific evidence you are acknowledging that the bible is a hoax, thank you for that.

Age of the earth:
https://www.space.com/24854-how-old-is-earth.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

Age of the universe:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/04/29/how-do-we-know-the-age-of-the-universe/#473db16a6155
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe

This is scientific proof, accepted by virtually all scientists, if this is not proof, I don't know what is.

There is also plenty of evidence that the flood didn't happen, in fact no history book talks about it anywhere.

https://www.csicop.org/si/show/twenty-one_reasons_noahs_worldwide_flood_never_happened
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_flood

Rip badecker.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Astargath on October 16, 2018, 05:45:40 AM

Quote from: BADecker on October 15, 2018, 09:16:02 PM

Quote from: Vod on October 13, 2018, 02:59:38 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 13, 2018, 02:20:14 PM

The God that the Bible is referring to is the God of the universe that science has proven to exist.

Then why was the bible written at least 80 years after this god died?

Five + generations of people forget about this god, then suddenly many people remember in great detail. Roll Eyes

The bible is a work of fiction.

God didn't die.

People like you simply focused away from God, so He revealed Himself over and over, again and again so that some of them could be saved.

The Bible is the greatest truth.

Cool

Proved scientifically that the bible is false ^^ ^^^

Thank you for acknowledging that God exists. Cool

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: BADecker on October 15, 2018, 09:16:02 PM

Quote from: Vod on October 13, 2018, 02:59:38 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 13, 2018, 02:20:14 PM

The God that the Bible is referring to is the God of the universe that science has proven to exist.

Then why was the bible written at least 80 years after this god died?

Five + generations of people forget about this god, then suddenly many people remember in great detail. Roll Eyes

The bible is a work of fiction.

God didn't die.

People like you simply focused away from God, so He revealed Himself over and over, again and again so that some of them could be saved.

The Bible is the greatest truth.

Cool

Proved scientifically that the bible is false ^^ ^^^

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Vod on October 13, 2018, 02:59:38 PM

Quote from: Astargath on October 13, 2018, 02:20:14 PM

The God that the Bible is referring to is the God of the universe that science has proven to exist.

Then why was the bible written at least 80 years after this god died?

Five + generations of people forget about this god, then suddenly many people remember in great detail. Roll Eyes

The bible is a work of fiction.

God didn't die.

People like you simply focused away from God, so He revealed Himself over and over, again and again so that some of them could be saved.

The Bible is the greatest truth.

Cool

udam

jr. member

Activity: 96

Merit: 1

can anyone believe in science all time. more and more new theories have come to world with making false previous theories. People are thinking always scientific reason for every thing, but can every incident in world explain by science. I think finding proof for Gods doesn't important believe is important.

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 34. (Read 845650 times)