Topic: [SDC] ShadowCash | Welcome to the UMBRA - page 438. (Read 1289714 times)

So... this isn't the Darkcoin thread why's everyone talking about it?


Back to SDC.

QT does not compile whatsoever on Linux. I've switched branches from master to anon --both don't compile-- I've checked out tags, yet everything is a no go. I can however compile the daemon just fine.

Any advice?

Here's my output just from doing only qmake:
Note: Same on both master branch & anon branch.

This is a very superficial comment, Darksend is a very serious project in constant evolution. We've had several versions and each improves over the previous one, when a bug is found it is openly posted to Jira and you can track it on Github too. If you think there will never be any issues with your implementation you are delusional.  We've been able to add 3 additional first class programmers including Pratrick Mchardy of linux core netfilter fame. Right now, they are working on hardening and refinement of the code.

I wish you the best of luck with your project, I personally don't like proof of stake, but the notion that there will be a "winner", is silly.  If a coin wants to be succesful the developers and community need to develop an economy around it, if you think you will just hold your stash and sell  later on at a much higher price just because your devs are releasing something you are up for a rude awakening.

Darkcoin is somewhat successful because there is an extended development team that goes way beyond coders and also a foundation that promotes it. So lets see where we all are in 6 months. In my opinion the biggest hurdle Proof of Stake coins with a short Proof of Work phase will face is lack of coin distribution and thus a small unattractive market but I guess time will tell.

Cool... thanks for the level headed answer and non trollish tone  I can see i might have sounded a bit trollish myself...maybe I will wait and see or maybe ill convert these drks to SDCs..time will tell

Considering a lot of attention has been on rebuilding the coin on the new 0.9.3 bitcoin codebase and the fix has already been merged into it, I'd say it isn't the end of the world. Shouldn't be a shocker that things get broken at times (not saying it's fine or ideal, but it can, and does, happen). I'm actually surprised the fix itself hasn't been merged into master but at the same time I'm sure the reason is a full push to the new tree sooner rather than later (then instantx testing on testnet).

Since this is the SDC thread, I wish to respect that and end the discussion on another coin as is. You are more than welcome to continue this discussion in our thread if you like.

LOL so the only way to anonymize your coins for dark is broken? WOW
edit: only reason why i bought these coins was to use darksend.... epic fail

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/cannot-use-darksend-mixing.3269/

To coins101 or whoever that Dark troll was in here pushing his agenda........dark send blows  Ive been sitting here waiting well over 2 hours waiting for 434 drk coins to go through 2 rounds of mixing. And it just keeps trying to "submitted to masternode, waiting in queue" and then goes idle. Been stuck at 0% for the whole 2 hours. So yea...darksend is pretty clunky and slow.. that is if it even can mix these coins which isnt even a big amount!! 

Nice point, Battbott.


There are also chances that you missed some things...

I like the fact that you are tech savvy, but I cannot help myself to think your method is starting to be a bit socially inappropriate in term of behavior. You've made your point several time, and it's normal that the community is defending the work (and the thread!). Now perhaps ask SDCdev directly your questions and/or come back later maybe?

I guess he's the best one to talk with, after all, the community is only the community and the dev is the dev .

If you still wanna discuss with the community otherwise maybe  #shadowcash  would be better?

i really like to read what you are writing, thanks again...keep on writing

it is objective ideas, not kiddish, not fuddish ideas like others has

smooth....my friend, you made your point...go and write at your own topic now...because you are not objective

BRO there is like no difference between Bytecoin and XMR BIG BIG BIG difference between BTC and SDC seriously WTF.

That's totally false now. The code has diverged a lot. It was true at the very start of the Monero project. Just as there was a day when the original SDC was just identical to Bitcoin (or Peercoin or whatever it directly forked from).

I still don't get why you think that matters. Maybe if you just feel like you want to trash talk Monero for whatever reason, you should come over to the Monero thread and do it, instead of derailing the conversation here about cryptonote-based cryptography in SDC?

SDC is a fork of BTC

XMR is a fork of BCN

None of this coins are clone, there is a lot of developments added to the original code

The difference is XMR is a direct clone of Bytecoin the only difference the premine and the devs, I see a few differences between SDC and BTC hahaha ridicules comparison, but all the best for XMR hope it does well no reason why it can't, best of luck to you also, hope you get rich no matter your investment  SDC or XMR, Merry christmas.

No, they are on the same chain. Sidechains are something different.

So would Shadow Tokens (SDT) be considered a sidechain on top of SDC?  Or no?

According to them, they didn't. The cryptonote team developed the cryptography and design and the bytecoin team did the reference implementation for them. The bytecoin team then wanted to focus on the actual currency so the group split. Perhaps the original designers weren't real interested in running an 82% premine pump-and-dump scam? Who knows. I have no idea how much of that is true, but I know for certain that we don't actually know who developed or invented any of it. The are all fake names and and largely fake stories behind them.


What?  SDC is a clone of bitcoin, unless I'm mistaken. That's the normal and intelligent way to develop open source cryptocurrencies (or open source anything for that matter). Rarely does it make sense to write the whole damn thing from scratch. Even your darling bytecoin for example, includes big pieces of existing cryptography libraries. All par for the course.

Bytecoin devs developed cryptonote bro that's why it's relevant? as i said i was invested in all the annoncoins from the start because that's were the money will soon be at, i have profited off all of them, so im not obsessed it's just a fact that bytecoin devs developed the tech XMR copied.And this is the SDC thread i dumped my XMC for XC like 6 months ago you were the one who brought XMR up, not me, I'm just telling you it's a clone unlike SDC.

Dude, I'm not sure why you are obsessed with Monero and Bytecoin. That ship sailed a long time ago. But the point is that the true credit for the cryptography used by all of these coins lies with the developers of the cryptonote design, whoever they are.

Monero has rewritten significant parts of the Bytecoin code from scratch by now, and extensively refactored other parts, and will likely do far more of this. Monero does not, however, claim to be the inventor of the cryptonote design, or the original writer of the code. We always credit cryptonote for their work. Credit where credit is due.