Heads-up: after multiple users requested something like this, I created a "Tl; dr version" of OP (and of the events following OP) in
post #2. I'll keep this post updated based on evolution of current events. I also mentioned in OP that a sum-up is available in post #2.
Anyway, I'm not advocating for red trust, but I also probably wouldn't oppose a flag if any of the participants of the contest can provide solid reasoning based on the facts of this "sponsor" deal alone (without detours to plagiarism and all the other drama).
While I am not 100% certain if he deserves negative feedback(s) or not for his sudden cancelling of the sponsorship, after earning merits / popularity / reputation for almost 1 year while he appeared as a generous sponsor of this contest, I believe it will be legit if contest winners will raise flag(s) against him -- and I'll also support them.
"Trick".
This new nickname fits nicely
I also share this thought
In this guy's case everything looks shady. Even the new name, because "Symmetrick" contains the part "Trick"... Like he is trying another trick. Maybe his final trick before exiting the stage? Oo
His change of name recently makes it looks like that he is not a DT a long time ago or never become a DT since it’s fresh data for his new username.
If you followed the discussion, you could notice that he was
kicked out of DT on November 7th and
not a long time ago. This happened as a result of the existence of this topic combined with Ratimov / Symmetrick's recent actions. You can find a sum-up of all this topic discussion in
post #2.
I've never interacted with Symmetrick/Ratimov, but I respect the contributions he made to forum in terms of the amount of knowledge he's contributed
You should bear in mind that 90% of all his contributions were plagiarized or copy-pasted (based on his own words):
Quoting for historical reference and take a look at messages at numbers 33, 101, 108, 115.Here, really original content, maybe 10%, the rest is all a copy-paste of finished materials or partial use of someone else's material.
this feels more like Ratimov/Symmetrick is purposefully under the microscope even after Ratimov/Symmetrick left DT1. He's out, mission accomplished? Just lock the thread unless they get back in DT1/Somehow re-include themselves?...and if so, then reopen the thread? Or is the new goal to give them negative trust with the microscope, hence thread staying open?
I had in mind to lock the thread after the question from OP has been answered -- "
Should Ratimov aka Symmetrick be in DT1?" -- (and the outcome was that he belongs nowhere near DT) but things escalated, as Ratimov / Symmetrick, after the apparition of this topic, proceeded to apparently an endless list of other shady actions (summarized in
post #2). Since I thought it was not needed to have new topics for his new dementia I decided to leave this thread open -- and, as a consequence, his following actions were presented (and debated) here.
And, as you see, suchmoon said something similar:
It's better to keep the thread open collecting all the drama in one place rather than having all sorts of digarans create a bunch of new ones if this is locked. It's not like Symmetrick would magically cease stomping his feet and lashing out upon locking the thread.
Leave digaran alone. Digaran did nothing wrong :,(
Also “symmetrick” should be “cheaptrick”
Lol!