Topic: Spartacus Letter - page 4. (Read 2266 times)

They are asking researchers to come up with a nanoparticle transducer that has single-neuron resolution, which can be ingested or injected into someone (that is, introduced into the body non-surgically), bypass the blood-brain barrier, self-assemble in the brain, and facilitate two-way communication with neurons via an external encoder/decoder system.

To reach high temporal and spatial resolution, N3 will focus on two approaches: noninvasive (Technical Area 1 –TA1) and “minutely” invasive (Technical Area 2 – TA2) neural interfaces. Noninvasive interfaces will include the development of sensors and stimulators that do not breach the skin and will achieve neural ensemble resolution (<1mm3). Minutely invasive approaches will permit nonsurgical delivery of a nanotransducer: this could include a self- assembly approach, viral vectors, molecular, chemical and/or biomolecular technology delivered to neurons of interest to reach single neuron resolution (<50μm3). In this application, the developed technology will serve as an interface between targeted neurons and the sensor/stimulator. They should be sufficiently small to not cause tissue damage or impede the natural neuronal circuit. The sensors and stimulators developed under the minutely invasive approach will be external to the skull and will interact with the nanotransducers to enable high resolution neural recording and stimulation.
Both noninvasive and minutely invasive approaches will be required to overcome issues with signal scattering, attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio typically seen with state of the art noninvasive neural interfaces. Systems that are larger or requiring a highly controlled environment – such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – and proposals describing incremental improvements upon current technologies, such as electroencephalography (EEG), may not be considered responsive to this BAA and may not be evaluated.
Final N3 deliverables will include a complete integrated bidirectional brain-machine interface system. Non-invasive approaches will include sensor (read) and stimulator (write) subcomponents integrated into a device (or devices) external to the body (Figure 1B). Minutely invasive approaches will develop the nanotransducers for use inside the brain to facilitate read out and write in (Figure 1A). Minutely invasive approaches will also develop the external subcomponents and integrated devices that interact with the internal nanotransducers. N3 developed technologies may move beyond the traditional voltage recordings associated with action potentials, and include different types of signals, such as light, magnetic/electric fields, radiofrequency, and neurotransmitter/ion concentrations. These atypical signals may require the development of new algorithms to enable accurate decoding and encoding of neural activity. To that end, the N3 program will include a computational and processing unit that must provide task- relevant decoded neural signals for control in a DoD-relevant application. It must also provide the capability to encode signals from a DoD-relevant application and deliver sensory feedback to the brain. The processing unit must decode/encode in real time with minimal system latency (Figure 1C). A block diagram of the expected final prototype is shown in Figure 2.
To prove the capabilities of the N3 system, four major demonstrations will show progress from a benchtop proof-of-concept, to validation in animal models, to a final demonstration of a DoD- relevant application in human subjects. In order to transition the developed technology to clinical readiness, N3 performers will actively collaborate with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) throughout the program.
ABC
Figure 1. Notional N3 prototype. 1A - Nanotransducers supporting read and write functions (for TA2 devices only). 1B right - Notional concept of at least two subcomponents integrated into one device. 1B left – notional diagram of multiple devices used to achieve multi-focal interaction with the brain. 1C - Processing unit for decoding and encoding computation between the N3 system and relevant DoD application.
   (minutely invasive devices only)
 Internal
Figure 2. Block diagram of N3 technology
External
6

HR001118S0029, Next-Generation Non-Surgical Neurotechnology
1.2. TECHNICAL AREAS
The N3 program will provide up to four years of funding to deliver a nonsurgical neural interface system and is divided into three sequential Phases: Phase I (base effort)– 12 months, Phase II (option) – 18 months, and Phase III (option) – 18 months. N3 anticipates that each proposal will involve multiple integrated teams (from the same or different institutions) collectively developing the technological approaches for read out and write in. Teams must structure proposals as a single, unified effort with a system integrator that address all the program goals of the specified Technical Area (TA). Proposals that do not address all of the technical objectives may be considered non-responsive. Proposals must address a complete bidirectional neural interface system based on at least one of the following TAs:
Technical Area 1. Noninvasive neural interface
Technical Area 2. Minutely invasive neural interface
System Integration
Due to the complexity and performance objectives of the N3 system, proposals must identify a lead integrator with a proven track record of managing and integrating disparate technologies. Starting as early as Phase I, system integration should be a consideration throughout the program.
Security Measures
Proposers must use approaches that ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (also known as the CIA triad) to prevent spoofing, tampering, or denial of service. It will be necessary to adequately secure the connection between the integrated device, the processing unit, and the system user’s brain. Proposers must incorporate inherently safe techniques into any wireless and electronic portions of their system, and proposals must describe the specific protocols and techniques to be used.
Ethical, Legal, and Societal Implications (ELSI)
DARPA maintains its commitment to ensuring that efforts funded under this BAA adhere to ethical and legal regulations currently in place for federally and DoD-funded research. Program developments will be discussed with a panel of expert external advisors with expertise in bioethical issues that may emerge as a consequence of advances in neurotechnology. Proposers to this BAA must address potential ethical, legal, and societal implications of their proposed technology.

Meta: This is a quality of Poker players, that made me recognize I don't have the mental fortitude or stamina to participate in the game, with anything approaching a description of fun.

I suffer from depression/anxiety disorders (treated), and the discipline required to "read the table" is too much for my simple trog brain, to deal with that level of theatrics.

I get so lost in trying to read the table, that I lose track of the cards in my hand, sorta thing, and fail to see the forest through the trees.

The human brain is such a strange organ.

Lol. You trust them because they agree with your preconceived opinions. If someone else made a long post with lots of references saying that vaccines worked (you know, like the thousands of trials and studies which do exactly that), you would ignore them.

Part of the issue with thinking that watching YouTube videos is somehow comparable to a medical degree and decades of first hand experience and ongoing education (apart from, you know, being an insane opinion), is that you can't even appreciate the disconnect between the two positions. Let's address the topic of reading and analyzing, since that is the one you brought up.

There is more to reading literature than just firing off lists of papers which you have hastily Googled which you think support your cause. You need to learn how to critically analyze research, weed out low quality case series or retrospective cohort reviews, pick out clear and hidden biases, assess the methodology, look for flaws in study designs and protocols, search for conflicts of interest, find any reporting errors, data errors, analysis errors, statistical errors, assess whether the data support the conclusions, the list goes on. Not only do anti-vaxxers not know how to do this, they don't even realize it is a process which should be done or even exists, which explains why they think a Bitchute video or some far right conspiracy blog is somehow "good evidence". It helps to explains why Spartacus is confused about why good quality trials show no evidence for the treatments they think should work based on poor quality trials. It explains why they link papers which are irrelevant to what they are talking about, mistakenly thinking they support their opinions, and why they links papers which make a very good case for vaccination. And it explains why anti-vaxxers are so impressed by a list of references that you have not read which do not support the points you think they support.

I have never claimed to be an absolute authority on anything, but I know how to read and analyze data and reach logical conclusions based on those data.

I know when we were paying for our house to be built, rather than go to a certified architect and then take the plans to a registered construction company with decades of experience, we instead hired some guy who had never designed or built anything in his life but had watched a lot of vlogs. It was far cheaper! The fact that I am now living in a pile of rubble is irrelevant.

We know that if you have severe COVID then you are more likely to suffer from one or more long term sequelae. We also know that if you get vaccinated, then your risk of catching COVID is significantly reduced, and if you do still catch it, the severity of your disease is in general significantly reduced.

@ICENI_Spartacus, can you answer us this?

"1. What do you think of al-hijama method immediately after taking the vaccine or just keeping a ginant neodymium magnet on your arm and then cutting the skin to release the vaccine? There are videos of people doing that - are they successfully extracting the vaccine this way?"

Thank you... I'm sure there are others who wonder the same... Thank you for your work!

OK, I’m literaly asking for a friend.

@Spartacus

what the cia do? rage in raping more white kids with fbi agents under the watchful eyes of the doj? (excluding the special rape clubs of the dod, as they are exclusive to the traitors in green)?

 'confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.'

...

Many of them are believers of Antoine Béchamp who think that germ theory is actually wrong and viruses do not cause disease.
  

Why not the following 6 antioxidants? Ashwagandha, PQQ Pyrroloquinoline quinine, Coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone), α-Lipoic Acid, Ginseng, Resveratrol.

Who cares??

They can't take my crypto away. Sure they can remove FIAT but how about crypto? Crypto is above any government or special agency for that matter. How teh fuck you came to this conclusion that crypto is slavery? Crypto is freedom you nocoiner piece of shit.

When this is over, and it will be over, bitcoiners will be the new rulers of this world.

edit: sorry that was offensive a lil bit I lost myself.

Not to be offensive, but at this point I'd rather trust ICENI_Spartacus on everything medical although I'm sure he's no doctor and you're actually a real doctor. And do you know why? Because this anonymous man/woman/whatever is actually trying to connect the dots like... logically.

You're not doing the analysing, you're not doing the thinking.

So when you have a broken leg or appendicitis you get a random "man/woman/whatever" to fix you up instead of a real doctor?

Does the experimental gene therapy show any efficacy, at all, to mitigate these long term effects?

~ you two stop dicking around ~

What's the point? Anyone who knows about "Spartacus letter" probably knows where to find it, and also the fact check article that you mention actually has a link to the letter. What you really want is SEO for "covid conspiracy" or "vaccine mind control" or whatever it is you're trying to do with this letter.

Who cares??

They can't take my crypto away.

Sure they can remove FIAT but how about crypto?

How teh fuck you came to this conclusion that crypto is slavery? Crypto is freedom you nocoiner piece of shit.

When this is over, and it will be over, bitcoiners will be the new rulers of this world.

@ICENI_Spartacus, can you answer us this?

"1. What do you think of al-hijama method immediately after taking the vaccine or just keeping a ginant neodymium magnet on your arm and then cutting the skin to release the vaccine? There are videos of people doing that - are they successfully extracting the vaccine this way?"

Thank you... I'm sure there are others who wonder the same... Thank you for your work!

There will be NO going back to the "old normal". The acolytes of the new global order are too well organised and too powerful for any "man" to undo their plans. TPTB will seal the deal once your FIAT money is removed from underneath your mattress, jam jar and pockets. When cash is gone kiss goodbye to any level of individual control you have over your lives and thank all the plebs on this forum and zombie fooks with their latest pay app or microchip who are heralding it into existence through the crypto "popular culture" and convenience over personal privacy choices .The plebs will literally beg for their enslavement while those who resist will be trampled over and insulted and slandered as terrorists,criminals etc as per protocol by media whores who are bought and paid for.Y'all are being played like a fookin banjo and when you are a digit within a strong city tagged like cattle on a meshed sensor smart farm you will have your digits frozen on yer block and chain when you refuse to comply with the ordinances of technocratic tyrants. And yeah once the block and chain is embedded into mainstream existence within each citadel you can wave goodbye to independent competing currencies which will likely be outlawed,forced into central bank regulatory compliance or simply regulated out of existence.

True story bro

Thomas Renz claims 45,000 dead from the vaccines:

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/07/22/vaers-whistleblower-45000-dead-from-covid-19-vaccines-within-3-days-of-vaccination-sparks-lawsuit-against-federal-government/

A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.

I can't speak for other centers, but in my center pretty much everyone is in a trial. Can't have a patient in two trials at once since your results would be meaningless. Far better to enroll people in to a big trial of a substance which had encouraging results in small trials than a substance which had negative results in small trials.

Earlier treatment is obviously better, but there is still evidence for remdesivir once the patient is admitted to hospital, otherwise we wouldn't be using it.

Like vaccination.

Pretty much every government does tell people to do that, and it would save many lives from cancer, heart disease, diabetes, stroke, etc., not just COVID. Figure out a way to convince people to do it and collect your Nobel Prize.

Because smallpox had existed for centuries and many people were already immune due to either variolation or childhood vaccines. COVID came out of nowhere and there was no pre-existing immunity. An unjust comparison.

I'll skip over all your mind control nonsense to address this. You've just linked a study which says "This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication." Once again, you are making a great argument for getting vaccinated and avoiding all these potential complications of COVID infections.

Take your pick: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95565-8

Such fun long term symptoms to choose from include fatigue, headaches, memory impairment, attention disorders, chest pain, breathlessness, hearing loss, joint pains, palpitations, depression, sleep apnea, psychiatric disorders, digestive problems, the list goes on.

Does it probably help enough for the risk to outweigh the reward?
Maybe in the short term.. Probably in the short term.. Yes..
It does seem these experimental gene therapies probably do help protect from these symptoms, for about 4-6 months..

Then you have to have more experimental gene therapy for it to keep working.. “boosters”
2 to start and then another booster every 6 months FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE..

Now..
Is the risk of one shot better than the risk of Covid?
2 shots?
Ok maybe..
3 shots?
4 shots?
10 shots?
21 shots in the next 10 years?


So what next?
What if you get boosters twice a year for the next 5 years, and then stop?
Are ya fucked?
Who knows..
They do not know..

As a long time poker player, i can tell you that she's almost certainly making a lot of things up. If you don't believe me, i don't have the time to convince you, sry.

In your professional opinion, does subjecting yourself to the experimental gene therapy, prevent you from contracting these long term symptoms?

IOW, do the risks of being injected with the experimental gene therapy, outweigh the risks being mitigated for the aforementioned long term symptoms? Does the experimental gene therapy show any efficacy, at all, to mitigate these long term effects?

Specifically, the risk of rogue mRNA-generated spike proteins shredding your vascular cells, as a result of being injected.

Such fun long term symptoms to choose from include fatigue, headaches, memory impairment, attention disorders, chest pain, breathlessness, hearing loss, joint pains, palpitations, depression, sleep apnea, psychiatric disorders, digestive problems, the list goes on.

Not to be offensive but your an idiot.

So when you have a broken leg or appendicitis you get a random "man/woman/whatever" to fix you up instead of a real doctor?

This must be the stupidest thing I've read on the intertubes today. Well, at least in the last hour. I hope you're just trolling.