Topic: Spartacus Letter - page 7. (Read 2266 times)

Not gibberish. There are entirely plausible ways of doing this. Not sure about read/write at a high resolution, but at the very least, they might be able to emulate deep brain stimulation, which, at sufficient power levels, makes people feel incredibly blissful and satisfied all the time, like Soma from Brave New World, or a Droud from Larry Niven's Ringworld. They use DBS to treat refractory alcoholism. Basically, it stimulates the reward response in the Nucleus Accumbens.

https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Clinical-Trials/Deep-Brain-Stimulation-Refractory-Alcoholism

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/03/pleasure-shock-deep-brain-stimulation-happiness/556043/


Okay, so you want to put electrodes in the brain. How do you power them if there are no wires? Simple. You use nanoparticles that self-assemble into antennas and circuits capable of harvesting RF and outputting a mild electric current.

How do you titrate the dosage to each person's brain? Simple. You use a source that can steer different beams of different dosages to different people's brains. 5G base stations are phased-array antennas with beamforming and MIMO. Problem solved.

But wait a minute, how do you localize the nanoparticles in the reward center of the brain? Simple! You look at the ratios of protein expression in different regions of the brain, and then you use a designer protein that opens the blood-brain barrier right at that specific point.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154547/


None of this stuff is technologically infeasible. At all. They're basically turning people's brains into Wacom pens, with a 5G base station in place of the tablet.

I've been hypothesizing such things on this board going back to a point many years before the plandemic.  Some of the hypotheses have been quite similar to the above assertion in fact.  It's simply a fairly robust explanation for such mysteries as the first-day vitamin K (with detergent and 25,000 times normal levels of the vitamin) + Hep-B (with Merck's AAHSA nano-particles) insistence.  In this example, the medical necessity explanation is not.

So, using these assertions/hypotheses as a hypothetical starting point for further projections:

 - Is it really going to be that hard for hackers to reverse engineer the signaling used to animate these structures?  Especially in light of the probability of technical engineering data leaking.  I mean, with a $20 dongle one can capture some bandwidth up to about 8Ghz for analysis, and obtainable equipment can go way higher than that.

 - Or just using the injected and distributed material as a general purpose antenna to exploit in the construction of a variety of 'services' which may or may not resemble the protocols and specs resulting from the work of those originally commissioned by DARPA/Blackrock/whoever.

Oh, so we just skip over the whole "does this tech actually exist" and go straight to insinuating that some people knowing other people definitely means they're conspiring? Does that mean the Pfizer vaccine is safe or is Pfizer founder's niece linked to someone in Wuhan too?

BCI tech is in its infancy even with electrodes physically implanted in one's head. AFAIK the whole nano particle shtick would require a helmet just to read brain activity. OTOH we already have drugs that affect "mood and behavior" so why not just put those in everyone's beer and don't bother with the complicated virus-vax conspiracy.

None of this proves that remote mind control exists, can be covertly delivered via injection to billions of people, and that this actually happened.

I wouldn't think for a second that you really believe that gibberish you're posting, so I'm quite intrigued how far you're going to take this.

Again, for the people in the back.

Moderna was co-founded by Robert Langer.

Robert Langer was a colleague of Charles Lieber and worked with him on a paper on artificial cyborg tissue scaffolds for human hearts that could be used to assess heart health, among other things.

Charles Lieber was arrested for his undisclosed ties to the Wuhan University of Technology.

Charles Lieber's papers explicitly describe the use of nanotech to make brain-computer interfaces.

Charles Lieber had grants from DARPA, among other military think tanks.

DARPA are intensely researching BCI tech.

Policy experts linked to DARPA are describing the use of BCI tech to forcibly civilize people, to alter their mood and behavior, not just enhance the capabilities of soldiers.

This is not Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. They're all directly linked in a manner that is highly suspicious.

That's not a "translation", that's speculation, loosely (if at all) related to the quote.

Here is another James Giordano quote for you, since you seem to be very fond of him:


Seems like you got your 12+ here, good job. Using your own standard of evidence "someone mentioned it in a lecture so if we pick the right cherries we can claim that this thing exists and we're living it", that's definitive proof right here that you work for the Chinese government in furthering their bioweapon attack (which of course is also definitely real based on the same standard of evidence).

Or maybe you're full of shit like all conspiratards, albeit more capable to overwhelm your audience with big words and irrelevant links and quotes.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-24/why-is-zillow-buying-up-houses-viral-tiktok-criticizes-firm-for-price-jump


There are news lately saying that Zillow is offering the sellers a lot more than the original asking price of the houses. Might be related. Guess who is the second biggest shareholder of Zillow...

Hint:

I will provide it, soon. I have to get some things in order. Someone is trying to impersonate me, unfortunately. They're claiming that they've got me for an interview. They do not. I never agreed to do any interview or stream or podcast or anything.

I am compiling a lot of documents and files on the pandemic, the response, and the big players in all this, but it's going to take time. I am a voracious reader, but there is still so much research to be done.

Just to set the tone, I'm going to share a passage from James Giordano's textbook, Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense - Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns, which I have in hardcover.



Let me translate that for you.

They are going to pacify (that is, "cyber-socialize") every human being on the planet completely. They are going to do this by injecting nanoparticles into people that cross the blood-brain barrier, which are activated by external transceivers and precisely stimulate regions in the brain involving mood, reward, anxiety, hostility, et cetera. This is why Blackrock and Vanguard and the like are buying up rural and suburban properties. They are herding people into cities because the infrastructure for mind control has to be concentrated there. It's too expensive to try and cover all of bumfuck Wyoming with phased-array antennas.

In World War III, the aggressors are governments and the targets are citizens. There is no actual conflict with China or anyone else. That's all pretend. If that war ever went hot, then the purpose would simply be to dispose of excess people. Our leaders all attended summits where they all agreed upon this. Not only would the population be reduced, but the remainder would be lobotomized with nanotech.

People thought that I was poisoning the well, or that this was some kind of limited hangout thing, by including those passages about mind control. They don't understand how far along the technology is, at all.

You are special. Really special, to ask questions like that.
Maybe you’d like his proof of vaccination too?

Right, kick ass. Well, don't want to sound like a dick or nothin', but, ah... it says on your chart that you're fucked up. Ah, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded. What I'd do, is just like... like... you know, like, you know what I mean, like..

who is this guy? johny titor? me say AI could fake it so easy...

scenario at WHO/big pharma ... they write the text they want, then pass it to the AI, get it like the other dude, then gain "our" trust, then fuck us again... classic.

but who knows... you are back on ignore, moron.

 I will say this. If he's not Spartacus, this is the most intelligent and well executed LARP I've ever personally witnessed.

 The preponderance of evidence, knowledge, and writing style give me an eerie sense we're not dealing with a "John Titor" situation here.

remember assange leaks? to pass cia code into russian code? we aren't in kansas 1920 anymore...

edit : didn't we saw our fair share of satoshi's here to at least ask for a little more, than... hehehe.

The dude's last post to this thread, which shows a basic command of the scientific principles replete with copious use of the same class of links that the Spartacus docs used, is actually pretty strong evidence that he is not a 'random weasel.'  And even if he is, the information he is bringing is gold.

---

Edit: I would point out that this Spartacus guy is not claiming to be a medical doctor and coming here giving medical advise.  Doing so, as does o_i_l_e_o, runs afoul of professional policy and ethics so in that case the supposed 'doctor' is either a fraud, or a criminal.  You're choice.

finally, someone who puts back the "church at the center of the village"... so who is this guy? no dual signing? and still it wouldn't prove the original...

good discussion on this topic of identity and internet between the health ranger and the Zach Vorhies (traitor from google) here : https://www.brighteon.com/152506f3-a900-4fb5-bcbc-7d28231e8ef9

however "zach" is a deep fake, because he pushes for biometric identification / signing, aka totally in line with the one world gov mission and agenda...

this war... this war... will take down a lot of men and females who believed to be way smarter than they really are...

...Proof of identity?

Any random weasel on this forum can register an account with "Spartacus" in it.

re read... how can someone be so suspicious toward nutritional balance? it's basic... only a sdg agent (social developpement goal, vaxx them all, look it up, it's one of their goals)... there will be triage, don't worry...

I understand your sentiment but you are barking at the wrong tree. I think Gyfts isn't the terrorist you are looking for. At least that's the impression I got from his/her posts. As I understood, he is leaning more towards right-wing which are mostly against the m-rna vaccines. There are other vaccine worshipers around even in this topic. Why don't you  canalize your hate towards somewhere else? (even then, death threats are not cool)

mofos of all hells. you are the one fucking with us. you are the ones lying to us. you are to ones closing our buinesses. you are the ones declaring us non essentials. you are the ones covering for pedos. you are the ones keeping this scam goiing for some fucking bucks? and you have the audacity to tell me something? no, it's not dissententers that you, be traitors, enemies of mankind. as such those aren't threat, but a simple of seeing things. you have declared war on us. want to us from living? because co2, because we breed? you want the earth for yourselves, according to your sustainable developpement goals? you believe this crap will fly? you have attacked CHINA... RUSSIA... and many more, among ME...

big lllleeeee mistakes.... big leee....

and what the fuck do you speak about ? never heard of nutritionnal deficiencies? terrain theory is beyond a theory is a reality. however, yeah, even with the best nutrition, sleep paterns, sports and kind environnement, illness can get you down, like lightning.

ahhhhh the little "medical trope"... I love this use of psychological science as an offensive means, because it's so weak... I prefer as said FTL energy warfare, but as it's beyond the realm of most in the galaxies, we will do with what have, and if it means stone, rocks, sticks, and smokes (to root you out of your bunkers) so will it be.... fire is a powerful weapon in itself, certainly the greatest conquest of mankind... so please... keep doing your "enemy work", it's already way too late for your kind...

I just want that YOUR kids are included in the kill lists, as it's apparently the last part under negociations.

die.

is it clear?

you dow us, we dow back. fine? fair? who cares, may the winner take it, and I hate to lose... hate.... it makes me very angry...


they have dow us (declaration of war) and engaged (bio weapon release + denial of treatments + forced injections) what the fuck in the hell more do you want? stop alex jones kool aid plz. it's war. and in war only victory counts, the rest is for the winners to write.

and those aren't "death threat". I want to be clear... it's a war. one side will exterminate the other. end. there is no legal term. only the laws of war.

read his post... denying nutrional deficiencies or imbalances is basic medical practices... basic, level 0. ground floor... you want to heal someone? or chronically customerize it? that's the question. I have my answer... markets need regulations... and if there isn't a more important market than healing, I don't know which one...

as said the war has already been launched... so... what else do you want?

Wo wo wo, slow down tinker bell. I don't know what triggered you that much but death threats are not cool. How teh fuck you decided that Gyfts is a terrorist? Look what you have done Spartadude, you started the next world war in btt.

Had you not been so adamant about killing those that dissent, you might've learned that alternate treatments aren't something that I would argue against, only when absent of any true evidence. Treatments of HCQ are largely debunked, and Ivermectin may or may not work. You can find a study from all angles. Zinc, vitamin supplementation, on the other hand, seems promising, but isn't a cure. Basically, you want to be someone that is properly supplemented on vitamins and get Covid rather than be someone with Covid deficient of vitamins. So while you chase debunked treatment options, you miss the ones that actually work - some of which you've listed here.

And who is "we," exactly? Do you mean the other senile dementia patients that were given internet access before their demise?