Topic: Terrence Crawford vs Errol Spence - July 29 - page 8. (Read 2396 times)

Not totally wrong but these boxers' picks are also based on self-preference. Sometimes, they are disregarding and not recognizing the strength of their dislike boxers because of personal reasons. In other words, they are biased in their picks because maybe they have had an issue before with that boxer, beaten badly before by that boxer, and something along those lines.

I'd rather read and referred to those boxing analysts who are neutral most of the time and the factors to consider are all technical and not being a fan or hater. There are lots of boxing analysts here in our local sports that is referring to pure technical analysis when giving a pick.

Anyways, as I also mentioned before, many will pick Crawford here because they hated Spence ducking the scene strategy for a long time.

Boxing week and full of big fights this week!

It's fight week guys,

Live streams before the fight:

Grand Arrivals: http://s.sho.com/729GA
Workout: http://s.sho.com/729UMW
Presser: http://s.sho.com/729PC
Weigh-In: http://s.sho.com/729WI

Hopefully, everyone by now has put their bets on this fight, Crawford is still the favourite as far as betting odds. But we all know that this is going to be a very close fight!!!

It's always biased mate because we too have our own preference and standard of which helps us think who got the upper hand between the boxers who will fight in the said match.

But sometimes, we cannot help it because there are some instances that when we are unable to decide which one to bet and that is where these speculations given by the boxers will come out to help us to weigh which is better and do have a much higher chance in winning. We just need to filter which speculations are better.

I couldn't say less. Also, there is a big reason why the fans around the world wanted to witness this fight for some years now because apart from the entertainment that they will see if the fight will happen, it will also bring them an answer on who is more dominant between the two elites because that question has been asked by many people for a few years now and I know some are already arguing about it even though they are only speculating about what would be the outcome.

Well, this time, that question will finally be answered. Just a few more days to be exact!

We cannot say for sure because both of them is good in finishing the match by way of knockout but saying things like that in this situation is a bit of an overstatement knowing how good these two when they are fighting inside the ring. No need to underestimate either of the two because they are better than that and they are undefeated for a reason but in this fight, I'm ruling out the draw because one way or another, only one will come out victorious.

^^ I'm not really sure if Crawford though can knockout Spence in just 3 rounds. Both are elite boxers, so maybe in the first couple of rounds it could be just feeling each other reading the moves, throwing feints and see what the other side will do or how they will react.

Of course a knockout is possible, but this two has high boxing IQ and with that, they will avoid getting trap and being knockout that early. It's already fight week and so everyone is really very excited to see which boxer will become undisputed.

Just wait until the fight comes if the line doesn't move that much from here I can see some heavy bets coming in on Crawford.  Dude is getting up there but he is still a monster amd this is the fight he needs to win to put legitimacy onto his career.  I wouldn't be surprised if dude knocked out Spence in the first 3 rounds.

In this type of fight, analysts and boxer's opinions are quite biased specially the latter because it's either they have been defeated that is why they are choosing the opposite side or they are a friend which is understandable why they are favoring Spence or Crawford.

So, you see, we cannot really count on them because in the first place, it's not their money whom we are betting with, it is ours and so we have to choose it personally and not because of what they are saying. Yes, our bets may somehow be biased specially if we are looking up on a certain boxer but we wouldn't be in that position if they are not that good or strong which impressed us.

Which is valid. There's no reason why you should be influenced by someone when picking a pick, as there are other resources
that you can use to weight your decision.

In terms of this upcoming fight, both are highly dominated type of fighter and with how we witness
them inside the ring, it will be difficult to predict which will be better for this upcoming fight.

It will be depending on the performances that they will be going to show coming from the preparation
that they've prepared to execute. It's your own take to risk here. Both fighters are capable of winning.

I never include other boxers' opinions when it comes to my analysis too if they are friends with the other boxers they will go for them even to the point of favoring them for a knockout win, and if they have a quarrel with the other boxer they will show it on their opinion, and besides we have videos of their past fights and their records, from there we can do a comparison on how well they will perform, but on this particular fight its hard to favor one over the other, you can go with either one and your chances could be good or bad.
This is the kind of fight we all wanted to see two undefeated champions who fight dominantly in the ring, I think both fighters are now in Vegas we are now waiting for the press conference and of course their face-off, everybody's waiting for this.
 

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis. At the end of the day, it's still our money at risk. That 1.77 ML odds is already good if you are confident enough that Spence will win, but if you aren't too confident, then I guess Spence has better value.

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

And it just shows how great this fight really is, everyone has it's own opinion and it seems that we are all in disagreement/agreement as who will win this fight. Crawford or Spence, the real winner here is the fight fans.

For sure though, those backers of either boxer are going to be happy to see their boy winning the fight and the arguments will still continue after the fight itself. Just like so many great fights in the past, the debate will continue. So I have my own take on here, and so everyone does, but it doesn't mean that we can't appreciate the talent of the opposite side.

I can't say less, we know that in some cases things can be seen like this, but if we put it in another context and the most real one is because of the business model that both represent, of course now that they do great things we have considering that Spence attracts, and Crawford not to mention, so now if we compare him for example with a Nonito Donaire, I know that he will not attract as many fans as the previous ones, so that already changes a lot, first if they see that they bring more Money that happens, the case of Nonito happens in second place, as they see that it no longer it is so popular and it is something "old" the organizers think that it will not be the same money that they are going to bring.

I don't know if you've seen the news, but both boxers, both Crawford and Spence, have been very active in the news, on social media, in the articles, it's clear that Spence has also wanted to become more famous with this fight, I personally think that Crawford is the one who has to prove everything here, on the other hand I see that Spence is very relaxed, he talks as if he were Crawford's dad and that overconfidence is not good in boxing.

There is little left for this meeting, and things are getting difficult, I think that here I will be going more towards Crawford, because I see him more hungry, he is looking for the way to have that meeting and for a long time I have seen that Crawford has been struggling, I don't think he is going to come out with a bad performance, Crawford's training has to be of another level and for a long time.


and now:

Terence Crawford Reacts To Gervonta Davis’ Prediction For Errol Spence Fight




Source: https://boxing-social.com/news/terence-crawford-on-tanks-pick-for-spence/

Well, things in boxing lend themselves to a lot of speculation, each person has their point of view, everyone says what they think best, and sometimes this must be respected, of course boxers are somewhat delicate when they talk about them, they can be good or bad things that are more delicate at this point, you have to know how to say them so as not to hurt their ego in any way, every boxer needs to have high self-esteem, a high ego, at least That is what we have always seen in every fight, and when someone speaks well or badly of a boxer, once in a while they can get a response , because they are messing with him , the spirits are there on the lookout.

You certainly got a point there my friend, this is just like the Mayweather vs Pacquiao fight where people will say that the fight should've happened years earlier when the latter is still at its best shape. But news flash mate, it's all about techniques even if it's off the court, we cannot blame some boxers if they choose to fight these known boxers when they are already old because they already knew their chances if they were to fight them at a younger stage and a defeat will certainly have a backlash in their career.

Everyone have their own sides to take, whatever we say here, it will not change a single thing if they already locked it in their mind whether if it's Crawford or Spence. Same with how would the fight go, people will always have a say regardless of the result. Some will say that it's because of inactivity and some will say that this fight should've made years ago when they are both younger compared today where the other one is already approaching his retirement phase.

If we base on Thier standings and career records then we can say that they are not too far Thier statistics are almost the same but for me Spence has the momentum and have a good percentage of winning. Also this fight is one of the greatest awaited fight in boxing history because both fighters are strong and popular so without a doubt this will be the star of the year and gamblers must know for this to choose Thier favorite fighters and bet with them.

Their KO difference is not that far and so I think they are somehow equal in that regard.
But when it comes to speed and reach advantage, that will be hard to debate because it is clear that Crawford does have those qualities, still, we cannot discount Errol Spence in this fight because he too can give an explosive and unexpected outcome. It will be a tight fight for sure and I'm sure that I'm not the only one that is still thinking which side to bet.

There are still no significant changes in the betting odds.

Spence 2.20
Crawford 1.60

Crawford by KO or TKO 3.35
Spence by KO or TKO 7.00

All the attraction points to Spence if you like a big win. Also, you have to believe that Spence will win so you'll not regret your decision. Spence by KO could happen, actually, since Spence has heavy punches and his KO rate is high. Maybe the quickness belongs to Crawford, but who knows.

That's part of the strategy to sell the fight more. It's nice to watch the game when the undercards are already exciting to watch. We all know that Spence vs. Crawford is an anticipated fight and it's sure to generate a lot of money. But they cannot be too complacent; instead, they have added more attractions to maximize the opportunity of making it more profitable.