Topic: Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod] - page 1178. (Read 172655 times)
I don't agree with users claiming Ben Stokes as one of the best players in the world right now. IMO, he is a very over-rated player and he is incapable of single-handedly leading his team to victory. On the other hand, Steve Smith and Virat Kohli have led their team to victories all by themselves several times. Stokes has done that on a few occasions, but he is miles behind Smith / Kohli.
4th Test is 4th - 8th September so still a while for players to recover from that epic 3rd Test. AUS can guarantee that they keep the Ashes if they win so ENG are going to have to be really up for it again.
Welcome Bro
Aussie going to retain The Ashes because chances are Joel Wilson not going to play for England this time
. England need to keep up their game and not relaying on Ben Stokes alone. More importantly Joe Root need to play Captain's inning in next game, this dude has every capability to become a Great but his conversion rate of 100s sucks really bad.Australian umpire Ross Emerson. Is this what you are talking about? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8z_9fI3q2M
No, Radio talk.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
4th Test is 4th - 8th September so still a while for players to recover from that epic 3rd Test. AUS can guarantee that they keep the Ashes if they win so ENG are going to have to be really up for it again.
Aham! LFC_Bitcoin!! Hey bud good to see you here :-)Just a side note: We are not talking against England :-P We are talking about the sports - cricket.
Edit: Forgot to welcome you in this small community. Welcome bud, good to see your post here.
4th Test is 4th - 8th September so still a while for players to recover from that epic 3rd Test. AUS can guarantee that they keep the Ashes if they win so ENG are going to have to be really up for it again.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
It was nightmare for Murli, in field players were literally cursing him " Black Cunt" and few spectators joined as well in this shit when they walked out. i don't remember who was the Umpire but i remember watching interviews of some Australian legends and according to them Umpire's call was purely inspired with his own prejudice.
Australian umpire Ross Emerson. Is this what you are talking about? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8z_9fI3q2M
This is why I mentioned that Stokes is one of the best at the moment, but there are so many epic cricketers like him currently like Steve Smith and Virat Kohli who are leagues away from in comparison.
Correct, no doubt Stokes is one of the best of this modern cricket but telling him all time best is very wrong.Quote
Stokes still has a long way to go to establish himself as a legend in the world of Cricket, but he is getting there step by step. He is providing terrific entertainment value currently though he still needs to be more consistent.
Stokes has better future awaiting and if he continue like this then some day in the future we may tell him one of the all timer but surely not yet. legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2412
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Okay i agree, minus 100 runs. 50 from Rohit and 50 from Raina. India won by 9 runs happy now bro
Where's the calculation which Mahmudullah can score wh was given a wrong out? Come on bro. It's not about win or loss. It's about either poor decision or corruption which is likely to be true in that match. 
To call someone the greatest of all time he needs to prove this time and again but the innings he played in both instances are incredible and one of the best i have seen in a very long time.
This is why I mentioned that Stokes is one of the best at the moment, but there are so many epic cricketers like him currently like Steve Smith and Virat Kohli who are leagues away from him in comparison.Stokes still has a long way to go to establish himself as a legend in the world of Cricket, but he is getting there step by step. He is providing terrific entertainment value currently though he still needs to be more consistent.
~Snip~
Also the hassle they gave Muthia Muralidharan about his bowling action was also corruption.
Also the hassle they gave Muthia Muralidharan about his bowling action was also corruption.
It was nightmare for Murli, in field players were literally cursing him " Black Cunt" and few spectators joined as well in this shit when they walked out. i don't remember who was the Umpire but i remember watching interviews of some Australian legends and according to them Umpire's call was purely inspired with his own prejudice.
~Snip~
The margin would have changed or even the result.
The margin would have changed or even the result.
Okay i agree, minus 100 runs. 50 from Rohit and 50 from Raina. India won by 9 runs happy now bro
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
~snip~
It is evident that someone from England is handling the twitter account
,
Very possible and let's not forget English media too. They like to paint colors even in the dust and make it a big agenda :-D It is evident that someone from England is handling the twitter account
,legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2412
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
I already mentioned that and yeah it was very close match , Bangladesh lost by little margin, Just 109 runs 
But if we go into details then it was not only one factor of losing match. Umesh Yadav and Shami deserves more credit when they wrapped up Bangladesh Top order result Ban lost the match and didn't even crossed the 200.
The margin would have changed or even the result. Rohit was probably around 80 when he was given not out by the umpire. On the other hand, Mahmudullah was in good form in that world cup, 2 centuries in the 2015 world cup. and yeah it was very close match , Bangladesh lost by little margin, Just 109 runs But if we go into details then it was not only one factor of losing match. Umesh Yadav and Shami deserves more credit when they wrapped up Bangladesh Top order result Ban lost the match and didn't even crossed the 200.
One more questionable decision from the same match was Raina's not given lbw which wasn't that much accurate. However, don't you think a clear picture of the wrong decision can change the mind set up of a team?
Umesh and Shami had done great but the questionable decision put much effect in the match.
To be honest, umpires can make mistakes and we need to accept it but when things are obvious that these are not mistakes then it turns out bad and it's corruption. The Australia vs India series is a very good example of corruption.
Rohit's NO BALL out was a clear corruption, it was a high no-ball which is easily detectable.By the way, it was Mr. Aleem dar.
What is wrong with ICC? They act so gullible sometimes. Stokes is a great player, but calling him the greatest of all time is pathetic and an insult to all the legends. Whoever is handling their twitter account is seriously dumb for posting such bullshit.
It is evident that someone from England is handling the twitter account , they tied the world cup but gave that to England and it is the greatest cricketing achievement they had and now in this series after folding to a total of just 67 runs and then went on to chase a total of 359 runs in the final innings is incredible and these two feats by Ben Stokes makes him the greatest contributor in world event when it mattered for England. To call someone the greatest of all time he needs to prove this time and again but the innings he played in both instances are incredible and one of the best i have seen in a very long time. legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Okay I see the fans for their own country (Little Mouse and JSRAW) are in battle :-P
To be honest, umpires can make mistakes and we need to accept it but when things are obvious that these are not mistakes then it turns out bad and it's corruption. The Australia vs India series is a very good example of corruption.
Also the hassle they gave Muthia Muralidharan about his bowling action was also corruption.
To be honest, umpires can make mistakes and we need to accept it but when things are obvious that these are not mistakes then it turns out bad and it's corruption. The Australia vs India series is a very good example of corruption.
Also the hassle they gave Muthia Muralidharan about his bowling action was also corruption.
Not sure about India but in the World cup it was fairly clear that most of the time the wrong decisions were favoring England.
Sometimes, it also goes in favor of India. You might have remembered the 2015 world cup match between Bangladesh and India, Mahmudullah hit the ball which was taken in the boundary, unfortunately, the player who caught has touched the boundary line but he was given out.Rohit got out but umpire called "No ball" which was not a no-ball at all.
That's how India win that match
I already mentioned that
and yeah it was very close match , Bangladesh lost by little margin, Just 109 runs But if we go into details then it was not only one factor of losing match. Umesh Yadav and Shami deserves more credit when they wrapped up Bangladesh Top order result Ban lost the match and didn't even crossed the 200.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 2412
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Not sure about India but in the World cup it was fairly clear that most of the time the wrong decisions were favoring England.
Sometimes, it also goes in favor of India. You might have remembered the 2015 world cup match between Bangladesh and India, Mahmudullah hit the ball which was taken in the boundary, unfortunately, the player who caught has touched the boundary line but he was given out.Rohit got out but umpire called "No ball" which was not a no-ball at all.
That's how India win that match
And if you really want to dig some Spicy content then look at India vs Australia 2008 series. Umpiring was pure Gold for both sides
Isn't it the series in Australia? India then refused to play the next test or something if they do not change the umpires and they had to change them. This was an embarrassment for World cricket. Yeah, It was ugly series for many reasons.
1. Literally shit umpiring, ( recent Ben stokes controversy is cute)
2. Players refused to walk out even edging the ball in slips against spinners.
3. Countless amount of Sledging on personal level, followed by Famous Monkey Gate Saga ( its actually very funny story
) then Ban on Harbhajan.4. Indian Captain refused to shake hands with the umpires which triggered OZ's tabloid
5. Then in the end Threat of leaving series.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
And if you really want to dig some Spicy content then look at India vs Australia 2008 series. Umpiring was pure Gold for both sides
Isn't it the series in Australia? India then refused to play the next test or something if they do not change the umpires and they had to change them. This was an embarrassment for World cricket. Edit: Yeah, I was right: https://youtu.be/92zqspN3W2c
Talking about Sachin vs Steve Bucknor? Here is one :-P
https://youtu.be/yF3Ss2e9KCk?t=8
And I am not sure why such luck happens only for teams such as England or India. I have never seen smaller teams such as West Indies or New Zealand having such luck. IMO, the reason is simple. The umpires don't want to go against the home crowd and they award the decisions to major teams even when they are unsure about it.
Not much with India TBH, it was another way around till 2009-10 (Home-away both). There are countless incidents of bad umpiring. Start with Steve Bucknor- Sachin's dismissals. If it was not for Bucknor, then Sachin could have been made at least 5-10 more centuries or match-winning knocks in World cricket.
I can remember a handful of decision ( One actually) in recent time, which helped India and arguably changed the Game scenario to some extent. 2015 world cup quarter-final against the Bangladesh where Rohit Sharma saved by no-ball and he scored 130ish runs, but it's not even a good example because it turns out to be a one-sided match at the end where Bangladesh lost by 109 runs.
And if you really want to dig some Spicy content then look at India vs Australia 2008 series. Umpiring was pure Gold for both sides
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
~snip~
Stokes was pushing his bat forward and it deflected the ball and he got 4 additional runs.
It was not intentional. So there are no point to ask umpire to deduct the run or to show any other form of gentleman-ship :-)Stokes was pushing his bat forward and it deflected the ball and he got 4 additional runs.
Quote
The umpires don't want to go against the home crowd and they award the decisions to major teams even when they are unsure about it.
Not sure about India but in the World cup it was fairly clear that most of the time the wrong decisions were favoring England. ~snip~
One? I guess both of his innings are controversial.
I missed watching the last innings so I do not have much to say about it however the first one (World cup final), I will say it was not about him or his innings. It was about bad umpiring and extremely Lucky England.One? I guess both of his innings are controversial.
- What could be a perfect catch ended up with an over boundary: You can not blame the fielder, he gave his best but it was too hard to control.
- Boundary after hitting the bat and awarded 6 runs where it was suppose to be given 5 runs: Not a single players, officials were aware about this error. Umpires should have known it but they were shit at it.
In both incidents, Stokes had nothing to do. He was giving his THE BEST for his country and rest happened because it was destined to be happened.
I will not agree when you say that Sokes had nothing to do with it. At least during the first incident during the world cup finals. Stokes was pushing his bat forward and it deflected the ball and he got 4 additional runs. If he was a real gentleman, then he should have asked the umpire to deduct those 4 extra runs. I am sure that if Kane Williamson was in his place, then he would have done so.
And I am not sure why such luck happens only for teams such as England or India. I have never seen smaller teams such as West Indies or New Zealand having such luck. IMO, the reason is simple. The umpires don't want to go against the home crowd and they award the decisions to major teams even when they are unsure about it.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/news/icc-faces-wrath-of-sachin-tendulkar-fans-for-calling-ben-stokes-greatest/articleshow/70874826.cms
What is wrong with ICC? They act so gullible sometimes. Stokes is a great player, but calling him the greatest of all time is pathetic and an insult to all the legends. Whoever is handling their twitter account is seriously dumb for posting such bullshit.
You have my support. Stokes did play few good innings (precisely two good innings) but this does not make him the greatest of all time. That's BS and over hyped.What is wrong with ICC? They act so gullible sometimes. Stokes is a great player, but calling him the greatest of all time is pathetic and an insult to all the legends. Whoever is handling their twitter account is seriously dumb for posting such bullshit.
it's just that I feel when the umpires are making decisions in England, they try to make them in favor of the English team.
This bothers me too and I noticed it numerous times. It's like they want English passport LOL. Jump to: