In fact, it depends on which currency you hold.
If you've done a good bounty campaign, then it is recommended that you hold a longer period of time and you will get more rewards.
Otherwise, you have to sell it immediately.
Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 79. (Read 7674 times)
You can't make generalization like that. Some campaigns have too many participants, that means you get paid less because total bounty pool is a limited number. Some campaigns are too long, so you have to stay with it only. Your other option is to join shorter campaigns and earn multiple tokens from different projects. You can go that route too. If ICO is doing well I suggest you to stay. Otherwise just leave and try your chance in other bounty campaigns.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
yes it is indeed true to all members or bounty hunter since they will receive the same amount of bounty pool but the work is being extended. The benefit goes to the ICO team and with the stakes being spread with the ICO perio you could get less in it regardless of what rank you are. Why? because the longer the ICO campaing will do the more bounty hunter will come and join the bounty program and they will share the bounty. Some of the bounty hunter will attract and join an ICO that will most likely to end. that is why there so many bounty hunters at the late day of boubty campaign. If bounty pool is not being increased and there.many bounty participants it would be most likely to receive small amount of rewards. 
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Just stay from start to finish as long as you get paid with your efforts. There is a possibility that the longer the bounty campaign will end the fewer the coins we get that is because of the number of participants increasing and one more thing is that they have the right to change rates and rules within the campaign period. That had happened to me once where rates and number of posts are changing it's so anoying in my part because I expect to earn more but what had happened is that I failed with my expectations and we can do nothing about that issue. My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
It is usually depends on rank. If a Legendary/Hero and Senior members account the longer the bounty the higher the pay however for Full-member and below the longer the bounty the lower the pay will get since high rank members have high stake per week than the lower ones.For you maybe u just stay than to waste the effort you made for the past months.
This does not happen in all cases. Although i most times prefer to join bounty with shorter duration of time and the reason being that, it has been a part of me to finish a task early and move on to the next one.
There were times i participated in bounty with extended period of time, yet the rewards were good, but i have noticed something. Most times, when it comes to signature campaign, a highly ranked member who participates in a project with longer duration will get more reward compared to when it is shorter.
There were times i participated in bounty with extended period of time, yet the rewards were good, but i have noticed something. Most times, when it comes to signature campaign, a highly ranked member who participates in a project with longer duration will get more reward compared to when it is shorter.
all depends on the maturity of the roadmap along with their campaign, all projects are almost the same ie raising participants and ico within 3 months, it's normal
there are other cases where ico is extended, many cases like this are pressed because the project does not touch softcap / hardcap and it's a bad alarm in my opinion.
there are also cases where the campaign time is only a month, here too many ico are failing due to less mature preparations to attract investors
there is no guarantee of certainty, I can only confirm from a large number of active campaign participants because I assume almost more than 50% of the investors come from their own participants.
it depends on how many coin suppliers are available in a bounty, even if ICO is delayed, if the coin supply is plenty then the income is also more and more, especially if many participants who go from the bounty then the income will be more and more.
that's true but I think more tokens will be cheaper in the market and to be honest I avoid projects that have a coin supply that I think is too much because although the allocation for bounty is great I do not think the result will be much because of the low coin rate My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
In fact, everything depends on many factors, on the type of bounty campaign, on the number of participants, on your rank and others. I always try to figure out what stake I can claim and from this I draw a conclusion to participate or not. If the bounty is constantly transferred is a bad signal for you, but even then you can get a good reward if you participate in the signature campaign and the main condition is that you must have a signature before the end of the campaign, since many participants can leave it.
This does not happen in all cases. Although i most times prefer to join bounty with shorter duration of time and the reason being that, it has been a part of me to finish a task early and move on to the next one.
There were times i participated in bounty with extended period of time, yet the rewards were good, but i have noticed something. Most times, when it comes to signature campaign, a highly ranked member who participates in a project with longer duration will get more reward compared to when it is shorter.
There were times i participated in bounty with extended period of time, yet the rewards were good, but i have noticed something. Most times, when it comes to signature campaign, a highly ranked member who participates in a project with longer duration will get more reward compared to when it is shorter.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
In general, this is so. The longer the ICO lasts, the more rates there are, but the less the tokens in each share. From this only the higher ranks win. In addition, it should be borne in mind that during this period you could participate in one or two campaigns, in which there would be their payments. However, it can not be unequivocally stated that the longer an ICO lasts, the less reward there will be. It depends on many factors and, first of all, on the prospects of the ICO project itself. Sometimes in such a long time project it is worth participating, because the project itself will turn out to be very good and its token will grow tens of times in price. 
Not necessarily, although now many ICOs are suffering and fail to reach their goals. But it is our interest to support them, beyond the immediate gain, because it is the only way we can help to lift the crypto market again.
The longest bounty campaign that I ever participated is CEDEX and it's on the 20th week now.
CEDEX bounty campaign was started last late November and until today it is still running and although there are too many participants but I am confident that I do get higher bounty stake when the bounty campaign ends because I am participated it's first week of the campaign.
now, I just want to push more until the end because my time and efforts will not in vain.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
The longer the bounty campaign the lesser the bounty is partially true because in the long run, there would be more participants and the more participants will result the increase of the stake divisions.
But, if you're are participating bounty campaign since the first week then you'll get higher stake tokens especially if you're higher rank like Full Member or higher.
Not necessarily, although now many ICOs are suffering and fail to reach their goals. But it is our interest to support them, beyond the immediate gain, because it is the only way we can help to lift the crypto market again.
Yes, bouties are less and less rewarding, especially now that we're all stuck at low levels.
And ICOs are struggling, in part because they are too many, and in part because the market is in a moment of stasis.
But maybe anything will recover, who knows.
And ICOs are struggling, in part because they are too many, and in part because the market is in a moment of stasis.
But maybe anything will recover, who knows.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
If the campaign is postponed / extended, then this often indicates that the project has certain problems. It makes sense to analyze this in time and to avoid additional losses - leave the campaign.
I try not to participate in very long companies. Bounty is a lottery. We can win well or not get anything. When the company is very long it is much more insulting to get nothing or get a dead coin
I think you're not exactly right. Yes it can stretch the period of the bounty of the company, and the profit remains the same - that is, you could participate already in another bounty, but you also participate in one, but I think that this does not happen so often! I think you should stay!
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Yes, it is true. because the amount of earnings depends on the percentage of stakes distribution. the longer period of the bounty, the more chances for bounty to get increased the amount of participants, the fewer percentage of distribution you will earn. if the rules of bounty allow you to leave without erasing your stakes, just leave it.
If it is about social media campaigns- then your friend is absolutely right. Most bounties don't have participants' limits. so the more people join, the less you receive. As to signatues, you may take ones that pay in tokens per post or week.
I really liked the idea with my subscription.The company is already represented on the stock exchange and pays a specific dollar amount equivalent tokens Byteball .In my stouts it's $ 60 a week.It is not bad..do you think?
Jump to: