Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 85. (Read 7705 times)
It's not really true that the longer the bounty, the lower the rewards. Assuming that the bounty is not a scam, few major factors that will affect amount of tokens rewards are number of participants (more participants equals lower rewards per person) and forum rank (lower rank equals lower tokens)
Yeah it could be like that,because one week of these high ranks will be equal to a month of work for these low ranks like me,and most of these high ranks are joining campaigns which are about to end so they could get stakes without having efforts.Unfair indeed to those people who are posting for months ,and i hope the bounty managers will see this problem sooner or later.
well somehow its true, but its not affect to high rank members, like hero, legendary but ya for junior rank , member rank if the ico go longer you get the reward low.
Yes it is especially in the signature campaigns it wont give you much when there too many high ranking participants,you have worked for 2months and and these high ranks will only post for 2weeks and they will have more than stakes that you will get? isnt that unfair for the lower ranks? that is why i dont usually join campaigns which has a lot of high rank participants.
In some cases yes? but if you have joined a low hype campaigns it would be much profitable especially when you get paid,less participants will give you more stakes than participating campaigns which has a lot of participants im sure you wont enjoy your stakes after the ICO has ended.Stick with the campaigns which few participants quality over quantity is a must.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Somehow its true,if we are talking about signatures,it is unfair for those low rank profiles who worked for months and then suddenly bunch of high ranking profiles will come before the bounty ends,most commonly last week of the bounty and these hero/legendary accounts will come to get good amounts of stakes better than your 2months of work,1 week of hero/legendary accounts would be equal to jr.member or member accounts who worked for 2months,that is whow unfair it is. My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
In most cases yes,it is indeed unfair for those who are working for months when these high rankings will join the campaign when the bounty will come to its end,the stakes will be divided with these high ranking profiles especially in signatures that is why you shouldnt be joining campaigns with too much participants or high ranking participants because you wont get much. 
If you don't waste a lot of time on it - it will be better to stay for you, because while a lot of people will earn some coins, you will earn max elementary, because of your start at the beginning. So, but the same time, you may earn as all another, if you will go out, but the same time find out something more expensive. Also, in case of delaying their campaign it means, that they can't reach the result! So may be your friend is right.
The payout of bounty depends on
(1) The assigned percentage of token before commencement of bounty,
(2) The total number of participants in a given campaign
(3) Rank/friends/followers of a given account used in any campaign.
My experience is that if a campaign last longer, it may attract more participants thus reducing/affecting the shares per participants.
(1) The assigned percentage of token before commencement of bounty,
(2) The total number of participants in a given campaign
(3) Rank/friends/followers of a given account used in any campaign.
My experience is that if a campaign last longer, it may attract more participants thus reducing/affecting the shares per participants.
Might be? in my own experience these high ranking profiles are coming when a bounty campaign will soon be ending because they can get a lot of stakes doing that,those who worked hard for months will only be 1week for those high ranking profiles especially when we are talking about the signature campaign allocations its too unfair for those low ranking profiles like me.
It is relative for to think when we study the campaign, the project, the team, basic requirements for the sake of our effort and time. We may agree that the lower the number of participants, the greater the strength of payment. We must comply with our obligations regardless of strength and when a campaign does not fit with your duties the universe will reward you.
Not really.. I got example for both cases.
Bad example. Rocket ICO - postponed several times since I believe August 2017, very long campaign, campaign now finally ended. Rewards about 20$
Good example: Utrust - very long campaign as well. One of my first bounties ever. Everything was long, campaign, calculations, payment. But, just for social media I received about 500$ in tokens.
So, I thing long campaign - does´t mean bad, and short good! It always depends. Good signature campaign is campaign with limit of participants. I saw many signature campaigns with 2k-5k participants that will share pool, and at the end everyone will get money for ice cream.
Bonus for long time signature campaigns - many of participants will left campaign during this period, and their stakes will just split between everyone.
Bad example. Rocket ICO - postponed several times since I believe August 2017, very long campaign, campaign now finally ended. Rewards about 20$
Good example: Utrust - very long campaign as well. One of my first bounties ever. Everything was long, campaign, calculations, payment. But, just for social media I received about 500$ in tokens.
So, I thing long campaign - does´t mean bad, and short good! It always depends. Good signature campaign is campaign with limit of participants. I saw many signature campaigns with 2k-5k participants that will share pool, and at the end everyone will get money for ice cream.
Bonus for long time signature campaigns - many of participants will left campaign during this period, and their stakes will just split between everyone.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
If you have joined signature campaigns that would be applicable because signatures prioritize those who has high ranking profiles,the longer they are in the campaign the bigger they will cut from your stakes especially when you are low ranking profiles in bitcointalk,the hassle wont be worth it and you will only waste your effort.
I drove the company for 2 weeks in a tweeter, with it a good number of coins came to me, with the above, I agree, it is necessary to understand what budget and who is involved, big ranks or small.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Stay if you think it is till worth the hassle,if the project itself is worthy to have you should stay but if you think the project will have a 5050 chance you wont get too much after the ICO has ended,picking good bounties is too hard but if you have picked very good projects your bounty tokens will be worth the price.
Most cases,the longer the bounty is the smaller these low ranks bounty signature participants will get and only those high ranks profiles will enjoy the bounties even if they have joined 1 week before the bounty ends ,lower ranks like me will be just suprised that my months of work will only equal to 1week of hero/legendary accounts.
In most cases bounty budget is set in advance so it doesn't matter how long the bounty will last you still get the same amount. So I used to skip bounties which last for several months, because I already had a bad experience where I got about 10$ for 12 weeks for work.
Well, it really depends but for me it is okay for as long as they will give you the token that you have hard worked for, it is better than nothing at all right, so I am not worrying how much I could earned I am after if that bounty will pay back for my job.
Thats unfair if those high ranks will join the bounty campaign when last week has come,because low ranking profiles will get not too much compare to these high ranks,some of these high ranks are joining the last weeks and you will be suprised that your 2months works of posting will be equal to 1week of an hero bitcointalk account when we are talkinga about signatures.
I don't like long term bounties but I think you should stay in campaign till the end
Jump to: