Is anyone unhappy with judging decisions in MMA over the last few months?
Is it my imagination or is judging becoming less reliable and more crazy over time?
I am unhappy with judging. I can closed eyes when judge in the ring isnt able to sometimes notice something (like punches in the back of the head, elbow on the ground or fighters using fence as a help against takedowns). But something must be done with judges that fill score cards. There are not strict and obvious rules on how to make decision who won round. Fighter can cycle for 4 minutes, make a takedown and win a round, while other fighter connected more and was more aggressive. I dont like that striking is value more than ground game like wrestling or grappling. If a one fighter was throwing strikes for 2.5minutes, and then spent 2.5 minutes defending from being chocked, according do judges, he won the round, but I would give a draw.
I really think in the ground fight they are looking for the fighter who is in control, and yes the judges are into more strikes than the takedowns because it is easy for them to look and judge the striking but if a fighter is more aggressive and more in control with his fight judges can tend to score more on that, but yes there are many unlikely scores, or some judges are biased, I really think the judging system is not really perfect that is why fighters should pursue more on a KO, or TKO so likely there is no need to go with the scorecards and that fighter really deserve that win, but I am not saying that you are wrong you have your own comment and I really respect that,
Is anyone unhappy with judging decisions in MMA over the last few months?
Is it my imagination or is judging becoming less reliable and more crazy over time?
It hasn't been less reliable or more crazy over time. It's nothing new... It has always been that way, esp if you have Chris Lee judging the matches. Lolol. And some those guys have no idea what they're doing imo. I think the UFC should file an official complaint about these judges to whatever commission they came from. Watch Holloway vs Volk 2 and tell me if Volk won that match. I mean sure it can be argued for him since it was a split decision but I think there was a bigger argument for Holloway. Dunno...
But if you're asking for straight robberies, no that's pretty rare. And it would be too obvious.
Apparently, some people or most fans for that particular fighter are saying that the fight was a robbery, I can not argue with that, because they had their own opinion, but if the majority of fans are complaining about the scorecards then the UFC should change the judges, they should not be biased with the fight, and the UFC should background check them first pertaining if they like some of the fighters then that judge will likely bias on that fighter, there is a huge chance, but the Judge system is not really perfect it has its ups and downs, so I think we should be understandable, and I agree with all you are saying, and pretty much many people don't like some of the judges score and me aswell I don't really like most of the scores, but I am respectful on their side, that is their job if they would give a biased score then that is their decision because they are the judges, and yeah it is not 100% accurate.