Chimaev did not go wrestling, because Burns is black belt in BJJ, and Chimaev got only purple after this fight (he wore it at post fight conference). Brown belt comes after purple. Even though Chimaev is not afraid to play ground games, his coaches probably warned him to decrease wrestling and focus on striking.
I wouldn't really say that's an issue. For example, what BJJ belt is Khabib? Chimaev is a wrestler first and foremost and wrestlers at one point of their career like to prove to others and themselves that they can stand a bang, or in other words, that they are good in standup fighting, and honestly, Burns was a perfect choice for something like that. In some contrast, if he did that with Colby, he would just get outworked, and if he did that with Usman, he could get his head blown off.
I completely agree with everyone here who said Yan won this fight.
And if the president of the organization says the same thing with stating the judges were wrong. Then you know something has to be changed there.
I am starting to think if this decision made by judges was influenced by some other factors, maybe it has something to do previous fight of this two fighters, or with current political situation.
Anyone who looks statistics and reply of that fight would give 3-2 win to Yan, except if you are part of Aljo team or you place a bet on him to win.
I think that something seriously needs to change with MMA judges
Did you hear the boos from the crowd before the match when he came out and even louder afterwards?
No, but I watches press conference after this event and I heard clearly what Dana White said.
One more thing he said is that new fight between this two fighters is pretty much guaranteed, and we are going to see them again in octagon.
I watched the fight, talked to an actual MMA judge (numerous smaller organizations fights judged, is an MMA coach, and went to seminars with the likes of Marc Goddard) that is a huge Yan fan (he thinks Yan is one of the best fighters not just in his division but in MMA in general), and he explained how he saw nothing wrong with the judging. The first round was a stinker to judge, but Aljo just slightly outdid Yan (but was really close), the second round was a 10-8 for Aljo, the third was more or less the same as the second but not so effective by Aljo and not scored that high, and in the last two he cost, but did enough to stay active and lose those two rounds but not by a huge margin like the second one was. I am not sure how to look at this and see a robbery rather than a solid split decision that it was?
Let me point you to another conundrum. The fight was judged by Sal D'Amato and Chris Lee, both of whom have been criticized before in their judging. Now let's say both of them were wrong (especially as it was Lee's third fight in a row) and we flip their decision, now we have D'Amato going for Yan and Lee going for Aljo, it still leaves us with the third judge that gave it to Aljo, and we can't really play the ol 'Well all the judges were wrong on that night' card now can we?