Pages:
Author

Topic: to Europeans: can you please try explain to me why your countries accept Muslims - page 9. (Read 10449 times)

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
all people in the world created by God

People is created by vagina and dick, all of them. 100% information, the smallest % is artificially created using non supported by Quran and Torah metods.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns.

The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings.

Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.

Smiley

Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true.
Just let me know when our friendly Christian fundamentalists start beheading people, will you please?

Otherwise drop the lame attempt at moral equivalence, and write something that's wroth reading.

I guess truth hurts.

You voted for this guy, right?

Quote
President George W Bush told Palestinian ministers that God had told him to invade Afghanistan and Iraq - and create a Palestinian State, a new BBC series reveals.
 
In Elusive Peace: Israel and the Arabs, a major three-part series on BBC TWO (at 9.00pm on Monday 10, Monday 17 and Monday 24 October), Abu Mazen, Palestinian Prime Minister, and Nabil Shaath, his Foreign Minister, describe their first meeting with President Bush in June 2003.
 
Nabil Shaath says: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, "George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan." And I did, and then God would tell me, "George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq ." And I did. And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, "Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East." And by God I'm gonna do it.'
"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2005/10_october/06/bush.shtml
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Not all muslim are bad. all people in the world created by God of course Muslim or not can go where ever they want there is no law that Muslim can go in some country. Why you need to think that Muslim can't. Are you God that can hold Muslim to go some where or put them only to there country.

"The person who is sinless should be the first to throw a stone at her" and now talk if why our country accept Muslims.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns.

The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings.

Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.

Smiley

Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true.
Just let me know when our friendly Christian fundamentalists start beheading people, will you please?

Otherwise drop the lame attempt at moral equivalence, and write something that's wroth reading.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
freedom for Muslims

Oh, so much teories "How to made better the life of muslims".
Such "export" is the consequence of today situation in Lybia, Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns.

The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings.

Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.

Smiley

Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true.

While there are a bunch of Christians that think like this, the ones that seem to be pushing war in the Middle East, are doing so for two reasons:

1. To keep Islam from starting Armageddon;
2. Oil profits.

The Christians who like the idea of Armageddon are simpletons that unwittingly support the real war makers through taxes that they don't have any idea about how to stop paying.

Smiley

Like I said, there was a bunch of those "simpletons" around Bush. And it´s a matter of historical record that he claimed that god had ordered him to attack Iraq and did so numerous times. Of course he didn´t mention that until after it was a done deal and they had invaded Iraq. Before the fact it was weapons of mass destruction, the new hitler and terriers and all that stuff. Anyway, it´s easy to confuse simpletons with certifiable nutcases or explain their nuttiness away that way.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns.

The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings.

Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.

Smiley

Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true.

While there are a bunch of Christians that think like this, the ones that seem to be pushing war in the Middle East, are doing so for two reasons:

1. To keep Islam from starting Armageddon;
2. Oil profits.

The Christians who like the idea of Armageddon are simpletons that unwittingly support the real war makers through taxes that they don't have any idea about how to stop paying.

Smiley
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Refugees are accepted, not based on your race nor religion

It's called being human trying to help a fellow human being.

You can easily compare this to as your neigbour having a fire in their house and they become homeless, wouldn't you help them out and have them over until they get back on their feet?
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism.

How do You will call "Liberal export of Democracy" to ISIS territory? A Rainbow beam of 500 KG Bombs?
National-Socialist Fighters of Syria allies.
Holy Liberalism in best colours of itself.

Not sure what you mean, but...

The exporting of real democracy to Islamic countries would bring about an abundance of freedom for Muslims, freedom that they do not presently have.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns.

The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings.

Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.

Smiley

Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
This isn't racist.

It has to do with religion.

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism.

How do You will call "Liberal export of Democracy" to ISIS territory? A Rainbow beam of 500 KG Bombs?
National-Socialist Fighters of Syria allies.
Holy Liberalism in best colours of itself.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

This termin is a fake termin of Jew brainwashing terminology, here is the example of it: http://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/eq/2006-3_221.pdf

"Islam fundamentalism" exist not.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.

There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns.

The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings.

Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".
...

No it isn't.

In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism.  We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism."  This is not complicated.

The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Europeans: can you please try explain to me why your countries accept Muslims?

Please, why are you mark and group people? We are all humans and we all belongs to the human race! We shouldn't act like this, by banning people from another religion, instead we should teach them what is right and what is wrong and how should they start to think and live.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
The first victims of salafi are muslim people.
The number of muslim victims is big.
Who send instructors and weapons to salafi and to Usama Bin Laden in person from 1979? - United States Of America and NATO.

I strongly support the growt number of non salafi muslims in NATO states to stop military help to salafi terrorist groups and ISIS "state".
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Europe heading to a trainwreck!

Europe=Muslim sharia hellhole=4th world
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.

LOL
Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"?
In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist".

But if goes to talk about Jew related terrorism and Jew owned Media on "news" manipulating - someone start to tell "What does that have to do with anything?"
Pages:
Jump to: