Topic: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? - page 44. (Read 45532 times)

INFLUENZA




Read a lot more at https://www.naturalnews.com/SearchResults.asp?query=influenza&pr=NN.

PROOF that vaccines target blacks for depopulation: Published science paper identifies infertility chemical secretly spiked into vaccines for African women







Read more at https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-02-13-vaccines-target-blacks-depopulation-science-paper-infertility-chemical-african-women.html.

My reaction to this issue is based on history. Because before, we can recall that vaccines were never invented and yet it makes me curious why people's lives were longer back then and there were not many sickness and diseases. So, it is really hard for me to accept that we should be dependent on vaccines in order for us to be healthy. It just doesn't seem to fit.

Vaccines are made for repelling diseases but let's be honest, not all of the diseases can be accomodated to be treated by vaccines. While some are treated but in other studies, it also depends on the body of that person if they can handle the vaccine or just be more vulnerable to diseases, or some allergic reactions from it.

People should be vaccinated. Cause there are desiese, that you can de of

i have a feeling that vaccinated are bad for kids and human developing since the result of it never counted and published to public, i have a child, in my country we have to vaccinating our child since it is a regulation from our government so we have to vaccine our children even if we like it or not. i have a feeling something wrong happen in our world nowadays generally.

Are you referring to the 1918 Influenza Pandemic? It started in 1918, and by the time it subsided in late 1920, it had claimed more than 100,000,000 individuals (out of the 500,000,000 infected). It disproportionately killed the young healthy people. If a vaccine was invented in time, then most of these lives could have been saved.

Why would it not be a rational strategy to start vaccinating for some 'prehistoric illness' when the problem cropped up?

As for EU, you must not include the U.K..  GSK is big there, and is a big factor in influencing the 'public health' system in that country from what I read.  I'd be surprised if continental nations are not similarly influenced, and in some relationship to how many nationally based multi-national pharma corporations they happen to claim.  Pasteur Sanofri (sic) is based in France IIRC, and they are big in the vaccination market all over the world.  (The specialty manufacturers seem to be the ones who accidentally get enough beta-HCG in the 'tetanus' vaccine to sterilize women, but it mostly happens on shipments bound for places where the darkies live and where there are to many of them.  Kenya, Philippines, Mexico, etc.)

Anyway, as I understand things, pretty much all 'developed nations' have some variant of a socialized medical system and all have a published vaccination schedule which is to be followed with some degree of rigor or another.  I'll bet that in all places a decent percentage of doctors and other medical professionals quietly do NOT vaccinate their own kids.  Or let them eat junk food and do avoid food containers which exude estrogen mimicking chemicals.  There is a reason why the 'anti-vax' movement is primarily an affluent thing.

Sure.... but going unvaccinated does lead to the spreading of illnesses, diseases and the like. Better to be vaccinated then not in my opinion.

It is true that the Pharmaceutical industry is blooming from some time and all i can say that i am lucky to live in Europe. Over here we don't have such kind of national immunization program but, at the same time we must admit that some vaccines are necessary, otherwise prehistoric illnesses becomes in present tens.

TB vaccination was never in widespread use in the U.S. and yet the rates of infection fell.  There never was a vaccine for scarlet fever and here again, it's very uncommon these days.

Obviously something besides vaccines (hint: sanitation, nutrition, etc) is responsible for lower rates of infectious diseases.  It is not very rational to claim that infectious diseases for which there are a vaccine regime declined only because of the vaccine regime and not because of other environmental factors.  It is easy to see, however, that vaccination proponents are more than happy to take all the credit and more, and that is the indoctrination which is heavily pumped in schools and in the media.

Funny enough, vaccine proponents are not very keen to take credit for the the SV40 virus which is associated with cancers and which came along for the ride with 50's and 60's polio vaccines.  Nor, for that matter, the various other random viruses which go undetected until millions of people have been shot up.

Before the discovery of vaccines, there has been records of high mortality and morbidity rate among the vaccinate diseases like tuberculosis and polio. The discovery of vaccines paved the way for these numbers to be reduced. Vaccines are of big help. That is why i believe that if we are going to compare, there is a low chance of people getting sick if he or she will be vaccinated. Death will be reduced because of this. The numbers showing vaccinated kids get allergic rhinitis,adhd and others, you really cannot link vaccination to that because there are na still a lot of factor to consider.

Vaccination is fine, in non-US and non-"free-trial/testing/research purpose" countries. Sicker people are those who don't take care of themselves. I'm not sure but why would someone vaccinated get sick if there is an outbreak of that sickness. If you study vaccine and it's history, most of them are effective and you don't need some of them. Some disease are really scary, like, our immune system are not ready for them.

As one studies history and the varieties of philosophical thought vis-a-vis ethics, it's not very far-fetched at all.  Indeed, it's fairly traceable in documentary evidence, although it may not be quite fair to say vaccine was 'invented' for this purpose.  Looks like they were latched onto relatively early in the development of the science though.

It is also easy to understand how most of the people who are learned to read/think under 'modern' educational system environments would find the aforementioned concept to be mind-boggling.  Managing mass education/indoctrination is even more of interest to the leadership class than is pharmaceutical based methods of control.  For good reason.

I think it depends, though you are vaccinated but your immune system is weak, still you will catch that certain disease. On the other hand, when you're healthy enough and away from exposure you will be far from catching a disease.

I've read some articles regarding vaccines and how it affects children and how not having vaccines affect them as well. According to what I have read and surveys children with vaccines are more prone to sickness than those who have not been vaccinated yet. This is why it boggles my mind to think whether they just have invented vaccines for population control.

Out of the billions of people who are vaccinated, 10 or 20 may die of the complications resulting from it. Make your own choice. Either you go for a 0.000000001% chance of death after vaccination, or a 25% chance of dying as a result of the epidemics. For me, it is a no brainer. There is a very small risk associated with vaccinations. But I'd still go for it.

In our country today one of the most controversial issue are those vaccinated children are gradually dying. This vaccine was the Sanofi dengvaxia the purpose of this vaccine is to help those individuals who have not been previously infected by dengue virus, vaccination should not be recommended. Vaccine helps to reduce or decline sickness and diseases but we cannot deny the facts that if a child is healthy and s/he was recommended to vaccinated with example the "anti-polio" after the vaccine we can observed that the child was getting fever. I don't think so if who are sicker the vaccinated or unvaccinated, because my grandparents are unvaccinated but until now they are healthy and strong but some of my the child who are vaccinated with many vaccines keeps on having a sickness and some of them died.

Yes, indeed. but being vaccinated doesn't mean you can be free from sickness and viruses. Sometimes vaccination  can lead to death, because some vaccines trigger the viruses to spread through out the body that may result to some complications.
So it's not about being vaccinated or unvaccinated to determine who is sicker.

Yes that's indeed very true but we can't also deny the fact or children sometimes get sick and some of them are even handicapped by the very vaccines that was supposed to protect them in the first place and it must be looked into before it becomes wide-spread.