Topic: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? - page 47. (Read 45532 times)
I am not sure where these studies are conducted,but what i can tell about this is complete bullshit,you need to be vaccinated and take proper treatment ,just avoiding these could not solve any issues,i am not sure how these kind of lies are being spread,if it is a authentic study i want to see the data and i want to know how this is collected.
That one's interesting, but chemotherapy is just commonly used term for cancer treatment with drugs. That's still a type of chemotherapy.
Clickbait media.
Clickbait media.
Chemotherapy obsolete? "Ceramide nanoliposome" uses liposomal delivery to target...
Read more and click the links at http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-20-chemotherapy-obsolete-ceramide-nanoliposome-uses-liposomal-delivery-to-target-and-kill-cancer-cells-without-harming-healthy-cells.html.
Penn State researchers have developed a new compound, called ceramide nanoliposome, that has the potential to replace radiation and chemotherapy in the future. This new drug is able to smart kill tumors, meaning it targets and destroys cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed.
In 2005, James Adair, professor of materials science and engineering, biomedical engineering, and pharmacology and partner Mark Kester, director of NanoStar Institute at the University of Virginia and former professor of pharmacology at Penn State College of Medicine in Hershey, founded the biopharmaceutical company Keystone Nano with the goal of gaining the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval for nanoscale biomedical products, the Penn State News website reported.
After years of research and testing, the FDA finally gave the green light to begin phase one human clinical trials to assess the use of ceramide nanoliposome as a possible cancer treatment. With the trials, Keystone Nano hopes to find safe dosing levels and examine the compound's efficacy as an alternative cancer-fighting therapy.
Providing a greater window of treatment and no side-effects
Ceramide has previously been shown to possess strong anti-cancer properties. Its delicate structure, however, has stopped other researchers from using it in clinical tests to treat cancer. The Penn researchers used nanotechnology to coat ceramide in a fatty lipid layer to improve its stability in the body. This new and improved compound targets tumor cells, penetrates the cellular lining, and deposes its chemotherapeutic cargo in the cancer cell.
"Ceramide is a bioactive lipid that selectively kills cancer cells. At equal dosing, normal cells go to sleep, cancer cells die," explained Kester. "The problem is it precipitates. It falls out of solution. The only way to deliver it is to turn it into a nanoformulation, which is our intellectual property. Think of it as a very small FedEx truck that delivers on time, all the time but only to the cancer cells."
Thanks to the extra protective layer, or coating, weaved around the compound, ceramide has been found to have a much greater window of effectiveness compared to current chemotherapy treatments. A window of treatment is the gap between the dosage at which a drug becomes effective and when it becomes harmful to the patient. Therefore, drugs with a larger window or gap will have fewer risks.
Though clinical trials in humans will provide more information and proof of its beneficial effects, dozens of preclinical animal tests have shown that ceramide nanoliposomes are harmless to healthy cells and remain in the body attacking cancer cells for more than a day.
In 2005, James Adair, professor of materials science and engineering, biomedical engineering, and pharmacology and partner Mark Kester, director of NanoStar Institute at the University of Virginia and former professor of pharmacology at Penn State College of Medicine in Hershey, founded the biopharmaceutical company Keystone Nano with the goal of gaining the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval for nanoscale biomedical products, the Penn State News website reported.
After years of research and testing, the FDA finally gave the green light to begin phase one human clinical trials to assess the use of ceramide nanoliposome as a possible cancer treatment. With the trials, Keystone Nano hopes to find safe dosing levels and examine the compound's efficacy as an alternative cancer-fighting therapy.
Providing a greater window of treatment and no side-effects
Ceramide has previously been shown to possess strong anti-cancer properties. Its delicate structure, however, has stopped other researchers from using it in clinical tests to treat cancer. The Penn researchers used nanotechnology to coat ceramide in a fatty lipid layer to improve its stability in the body. This new and improved compound targets tumor cells, penetrates the cellular lining, and deposes its chemotherapeutic cargo in the cancer cell.
"Ceramide is a bioactive lipid that selectively kills cancer cells. At equal dosing, normal cells go to sleep, cancer cells die," explained Kester. "The problem is it precipitates. It falls out of solution. The only way to deliver it is to turn it into a nanoformulation, which is our intellectual property. Think of it as a very small FedEx truck that delivers on time, all the time but only to the cancer cells."
Thanks to the extra protective layer, or coating, weaved around the compound, ceramide has been found to have a much greater window of effectiveness compared to current chemotherapy treatments. A window of treatment is the gap between the dosage at which a drug becomes effective and when it becomes harmful to the patient. Therefore, drugs with a larger window or gap will have fewer risks.
Though clinical trials in humans will provide more information and proof of its beneficial effects, dozens of preclinical animal tests have shown that ceramide nanoliposomes are harmless to healthy cells and remain in the body attacking cancer cells for more than a day.
Read more and click the links at http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-20-chemotherapy-obsolete-ceramide-nanoliposome-uses-liposomal-delivery-to-target-and-kill-cancer-cells-without-harming-healthy-cells.html.
Vaccinations are there to give the appearance of healing, while making sicker in other ways.
While they can make you sick, like in my case, it's a very rare exception.
Vaccines don't heal, but try to prevent you from being infected by a particular strain. It's like teaching your immune system about a threat before it meets one in the wild.
Perhaps some vaccines do that somewhat. But they weaken your system so that you will be sick in other ways... unless you are lucky.
Vaccinations are there to give the appearance of healing, while making sicker in other ways.
While they can make you sick, like in my case, it's a very rare exception.
Vaccines don't heal, but try to prevent you from being infected by a particular strain. It's like teaching your immune system about a threat before it meets one in the wild.
Vaccinations are there to give the appearance of healing, while making sicker in other ways.
The medical does not want well people. They want sick people so that they can make money from making them appear well enough to trick them into asking for more medicine when the next sickness comes on.
Vaccines might be a "cure" for a momentary problem. But they set you up for more problems in the future, if not directly creating those problems... like the autism problem.
If the medical put as much money into finding natural cures through nutrition, 2 things would happen:
1. Nobody would get sick anymore;
2. The medical would shut down after their investigations were published, because nobody would need them.
Nobody wants to lose his wealth. They want you to stay sick so that they can keep on making money.
The medical does not want well people. They want sick people so that they can make money from making them appear well enough to trick them into asking for more medicine when the next sickness comes on.
Vaccines might be a "cure" for a momentary problem. But they set you up for more problems in the future, if not directly creating those problems... like the autism problem.
If the medical put as much money into finding natural cures through nutrition, 2 things would happen:
1. Nobody would get sick anymore;
2. The medical would shut down after their investigations were published, because nobody would need them.
Nobody wants to lose his wealth. They want you to stay sick so that they can keep on making money.
So far i could say thanks for the vaccinations that my children as well as in our community wherein almost mandatory for babies and children to be vaccinated are doing well. Except for those illnesses that are not yet covered by vaccinations. I should say it is because of vaccinations also that those who did not recieve are also safe because they are surrounded by vaccinated one.
Come on, you are from these pagans, who think that civilization is worse than the herbal stuff? No, if it wasn't for vaccination, many people would die from the most stupid diseases.
Com on, brainwashed. If Big Medicine spent as much time finding natural cures as they do on Big Pharma stuff, vaccines would never have been developed.
Natural cures have been around for thousands of years. I read somewhere that the Australian aborigines have been using them for the last 50,000 years. But we were not able to eradicate epidemics such as small pox. Only vaccination enabled us to do that.
I have never been vaccinated - Always fit, and I rarely get sick; If I do, it's maybe getting a cold for 1-2 days because I did something stupid the day before
You are healthy, just because the people around you have been vaccinated. Else, diseases such as polio, measles, influenza, small pox.etc will reach epidemic proportions, and you will most probably lose your life to one of those illnesses.
Trouble with that theory (which is heavily promoted by the pharmacuitical industry) is that it doesn't seem to be occuring all that much in areas where vaccine coverage is limited or leaves out one of the dreaded scourges you've been worrying about. Maybe you bought into a load of marketing bullshit. Just a thought.
Did you ever think to worry about scarlet fever? If not, why not? I mean has at times in history been at 'epedemic proportions' and there never has been a vaccine for it.
There's just a lot of stuff out there against which vaccination either doesn't work, has low effectivity, or only lasts for a short period of time.
I think vaccination is still good for those diseases where it is really effective, for the well being of the greater population. Also, herd immunity helps those who can't get them themselves.
I'm saying it as someone who got their life ruined by vaccination. It's possibly hereditary too, but at least I didn't plan on having children anyway. It wasn't in a developed country, so I didn't even get compensation for that. You could say I won the wrong lottery. FML.
Vaccination improves antibodies of human but sadly some vaccines also adds some sort of viruses or bacteria which destroys human body also referred as population control.
I have never been vaccinated - Always fit, and I rarely get sick; If I do, it's maybe getting a cold for 1-2 days because I did something stupid the day before
You are healthy, just because the people around you have been vaccinated. Else, diseases such as polio, measles, influenza, small pox.etc will reach epidemic proportions, and you will most probably lose your life to one of those illnesses.
Trouble with that theory (which is heavily promoted by the pharmacuitical industry) is that it doesn't seem to be occuring all that much in areas where vaccine coverage is limited or leaves out one of the dreaded scourges you've been worrying about. Maybe you bought into a load of marketing bullshit. Just a thought.
Did you ever think to worry about scarlet fever? If not, why not? I mean has at times in history been at 'epedemic proportions' and there never has been a vaccine for it.
The Vaccinated!!!
I have never been vaccinated - Always fit, and I rarely get sick; If I do, it's maybe getting a cold for 1-2 days because I did something stupid the day before
You are healthy, just because the people around you have been vaccinated. Else, diseases such as polio, measles, influenza, small pox.etc will reach epidemic proportions, and you will most probably lose your life to one of those illnesses.
I have never been vaccinated - Always fit, and I rarely get sick; If I do, it's maybe getting a cold for 1-2 days because I did something stupid the day before
Even people who have a 'sane' view of the current vaccine madness still think that there is something wrong with catching a seasonal bug that puts one slightly under-the-weather for a few days. More and more I'm thinking there nothing at all wrong with this and it is actually quite healthy in that it keeps the various parts of one's immune system excersized and in good working order. The immune system is actually quite complex and it has a tough job. I see no reason why it would not benefit from needing to get a little practice now and then.
For the last few decades number I've been sort of glad to catch the flu or a cold. If it comes on quick for me (one evening) then I almost always get over it within a few days, and often just one day of misery. The ones which I can feel slightly in my throat in the morning for days on end tend to finally make me sick and they seem to linger. If I go a few years with no seasonal bug then the one I finally get seems to hit me harder.
Another thing about catching a seasonal bug and feeling shitty for a few days is that when I kick it I tend to feel especially fantastic for a few days. I suspect that is associated with endorphine production rates.
I have never been vaccinated - Always fit, and I rarely get sick; If I do, it's maybe getting a cold for 1-2 days because I did something stupid the day before
VACCINE INGREDIENTS LIST
- What's in that Needle??
View the rest of the table here: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/221830-2017-07-18-vaccine-ingredients-list-whats-in-that-needle.htm.
Download the table in PDF format here: https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/Media-Files/CDC-Vaccine-excipients-table-2.pdf.
- What's in that Needle??
Quote from: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/221830-2017-07-18-vaccine-ingredients-list-whats-in-that-needle.htm
This table includes not only vaccine ingredients (e.g., adjuvants and preservatives), but also substances used during the manufacturing process, including vaccine-production media, that are removed from the final product and present only in trace quantities. In addition to the substances listed, most vaccines contain Sodium Chloride (table salt).
Last Updated September 2013
All reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information, but manufacturers may change product contents before that information is reflected here. If in doubt, check the manufacturer's package insert.
Last Updated September 2013
All reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information, but manufacturers may change product contents before that information is reflected here. If in doubt, check the manufacturer's package insert.
View the rest of the table here: http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/221830-2017-07-18-vaccine-ingredients-list-whats-in-that-needle.htm.
Download the table in PDF format here: https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Media/Media-Files/CDC-Vaccine-excipients-table-2.pdf.
Catholic Church declares gluten-free foods contraband,
but says GMOs are just fine for mass
Read more, and click the many links, at http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-17-catholic-church-declares-gluten-free-foods-contraband-but-says-gmos-are-just-fine.html.
but says GMOs are just fine for mass
As more people adopt a gluten-free diet for health reasons, the Vatican revealed their stance on the gluten-free and GMO movements earlier this month.
At the request of Pope Francis, the unleavened bread used to celebrate the Eucharist during Roman Catholic masses can be made with genetically modified organisms (GMOs), however, the Vatican added that they will not allow entirely gluten-free hosts or wafers for the practice of the Holy Communion.
There are an estimated 1.2 billion Catholics in the world. Through the Sacrament of Holy Communion Catholics remember Jesus' Last Supper and Christ's sacrifice of himself on the cross. Catholics receive the holy bread and wine, believing that they are receiving the body and blood of Christ.
Since the Communion bread is now sold at some supermarkets and on the internet, Cardinal Robert Sarah of the Vatican's Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments said that they needed to clarify this matter and come up with a set of rules to address the latest gluten-free trend. The Vatican has ruled the bread can be low-gluten, but there must be enough of the gluten protein in the wheat to make it without additives.
"Hosts [wafers] that are completely gluten-free are invalid matter for the celebration of the Eucharist. Low-gluten hosts (partially gluten-free) are valid matter, provided they contain a sufficient amount of gluten to obtain the confection of bread without the addition of foreign materials and without the use of procedures that would alter the nature of bread," said Cardinal Robert Sarah in a letter to the bishops.
In the letter, Cardinal Sarah also reminded bishops that the bread should be made by people "distinguished by their integrity" and that adding fruit, honey, or sugar is a "grave abuse."
According to the Roman Catholics beliefs, the bread and wine served at the Eucharist are converted into the body and blood of Christ. Therefore, Cardinal Robert Sarah noted that next to gluten-free bread, the wine used for this ritual must also be from a natural, pure, and incorrupt source, not mixed with other substances.
"Until recently it was certain religious communities who took care of baking the bread and making the wine for the celebration of the Eucharist. Today, however, these materials are also sold in supermarkets and other stores and even over the internet," the letter said.
GMOs are natural, pure, and incorrupt?
Despite the concern about gluten-free bread being altered, the Church makes an exception for GMO foods, noting "Eucharistic matter made with genetically modified organisms can be considered valid matter."
At the request of Pope Francis, the unleavened bread used to celebrate the Eucharist during Roman Catholic masses can be made with genetically modified organisms (GMOs), however, the Vatican added that they will not allow entirely gluten-free hosts or wafers for the practice of the Holy Communion.
There are an estimated 1.2 billion Catholics in the world. Through the Sacrament of Holy Communion Catholics remember Jesus' Last Supper and Christ's sacrifice of himself on the cross. Catholics receive the holy bread and wine, believing that they are receiving the body and blood of Christ.
Since the Communion bread is now sold at some supermarkets and on the internet, Cardinal Robert Sarah of the Vatican's Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments said that they needed to clarify this matter and come up with a set of rules to address the latest gluten-free trend. The Vatican has ruled the bread can be low-gluten, but there must be enough of the gluten protein in the wheat to make it without additives.
"Hosts [wafers] that are completely gluten-free are invalid matter for the celebration of the Eucharist. Low-gluten hosts (partially gluten-free) are valid matter, provided they contain a sufficient amount of gluten to obtain the confection of bread without the addition of foreign materials and without the use of procedures that would alter the nature of bread," said Cardinal Robert Sarah in a letter to the bishops.
In the letter, Cardinal Sarah also reminded bishops that the bread should be made by people "distinguished by their integrity" and that adding fruit, honey, or sugar is a "grave abuse."
According to the Roman Catholics beliefs, the bread and wine served at the Eucharist are converted into the body and blood of Christ. Therefore, Cardinal Robert Sarah noted that next to gluten-free bread, the wine used for this ritual must also be from a natural, pure, and incorrupt source, not mixed with other substances.
"Until recently it was certain religious communities who took care of baking the bread and making the wine for the celebration of the Eucharist. Today, however, these materials are also sold in supermarkets and other stores and even over the internet," the letter said.
GMOs are natural, pure, and incorrupt?
Despite the concern about gluten-free bread being altered, the Church makes an exception for GMO foods, noting "Eucharistic matter made with genetically modified organisms can be considered valid matter."
Read more, and click the many links, at http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-17-catholic-church-declares-gluten-free-foods-contraband-but-says-gmos-are-just-fine.html.
Vaccinated children were more than three times as likely to be diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum
Vaccinated children were 30-foldmore likely to be diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (hay fever) than non-vaccinated children
Vaccinated children were 22-foldmore likely to require an allergy medication than unvaccinated children
Vaccinated children had more than quadruple the risk of being diagnosed with a learning disability than unvaccinated children.
Vaccinated children were 300 percent more likely to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder than unvaccinated children.
Vaccinated children were 30-foldmore likely to be diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (hay fever) than non-vaccinated children
Vaccinated children were 22-foldmore likely to require an allergy medication than unvaccinated children
Vaccinated children had more than quadruple the risk of being diagnosed with a learning disability than unvaccinated children.
Vaccinated children were 300 percent more likely to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder than unvaccinated children.
This website is known for its anti-vaccines propaganda, and so is OP.
Many of its crap articles have been debunked numerous times by real scientific websites.
Many of its crap articles have been debunked numerous times by real scientific websites.
Quote
A pilot study of 666 homeschooled kids
yeah really makes you think.Has anyone highlighted the 666 part yet?
But it sure does make you think. If you're in the public school system you HAVE to vaccinate your kids, otherwise, they won't let your kids through the doors for fear they might make the other kids sick. In America.......the land of the free (so they say)...........you are made by law, whether government or local, to give your child vaccinations.
This is the sickest generation there ever was in America, but if you ask the "professionals", these illnesses have nothing to do with anything that makes the rich richer. Try to tell them that it does and they're throw the word coincidence around.
I never get vaccinated and I rarely, if ever get sick.
But I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
i think the unvaccinated
Jump to: