Pages:
Author

Topic: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz - page 11. (Read 4587 times)

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 3045
Top Crypto Casino
May 11, 2019, 09:53:03 PM
#7
Vod has contributed lots of thing to bitcointalk.org community, whilst Hhampuz has been one of the most reputable campaign managers in the forum.
Trust is unmoderated.
If you think teeGUMES feedbacks are inaccurate then create your own custom trust list and exclude him.
jr. member
Activity: 82
Merit: 2
May 11, 2019, 09:52:31 PM
#6
I don't consider my personal stance on 'doxxing' a personal attack on any of these members. I think a precedent needs to be set and this should be further frowned upon. Many people have been killed/murdered from public doxxing whether it was correct or incorrect. The dox post also conveniently included the fact that OgNasty was holding onto 500bitcoin, this is extremely dangerous and I actually fear for whomever lives at the address that Vod had posted.
We have law enforcement all around the world for a reason. Let them do their jobs.
Even though personal information is allowed in the Investigations sub forum, the question should remain "Should it be?"

I have nothing further to add and I am surprised more people haven't risen up to speak out about this.

go red tag all those other investigation threads then, people are posting a bunch of personal info on people. OG is a scammer, he deserves to have his public info leaked.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
May 11, 2019, 09:51:30 PM
#5
~

You shouldn't be red-trusting people for sending merits though. That's fucked up.
legendary
Activity: 1253
Merit: 1203
May 11, 2019, 09:49:22 PM
#4
I don't consider my personal stance on 'doxxing' a personal attack on any of these members. I think a precedent needs to be set and this should be further frowned upon. Many people have been killed/murdered from public doxxing whether it was correct or incorrect. The dox post also conveniently included the fact that OgNasty was holding onto 500bitcoin, this is extremely dangerous and I actually fear for whomever lives at the address that Vod had posted.
We have law enforcement all around the world for a reason. Let them do their jobs.
Even though personal information is allowed in the Investigations sub forum, the question should remain "Should it be?"

I have nothing further to add and I am surprised more people haven't risen up to speak out about this.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
May 11, 2019, 09:47:27 PM
#3
Why is this in Meta and why do you feel the need to stir this drama further? PM teeGUMES if you're curious.
jr. member
Activity: 82
Merit: 2
May 11, 2019, 09:46:26 PM
#2
OG deserves to have his personal info leaked, that tax evading scamming piece of shit.  People are just scared because he is holding forum funds. many are afraid to challenge him fearing that he will  "lose it to a "hacker"
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 159
May 11, 2019, 09:39:11 PM
#1
Today, I saw Trust issues of Vod, and Hhampuz. Vod has contributed lots of thing to bitcointalk.org community, whilst Hhampuz has been one of the most reputable campaign managers in the forum. Both of them actually contribute lots of things, so what's wrong with them last hours?
They both received negative feedback from teeGUMES, that in turn results in ?? ? in their Trust.
Additionally, Reference in Hhampuz's  Trust page leads to this topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5140813, that does not relate to things mentioned in feedback. It looks like back-and-forth negative feedbacks.



Theymos' opinion:
- Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid.
 It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.
 
I'm not going to blacklist people from DT selection due to not following my views



Is this one of the most vulnerable things of Trust sytem, and easily to abuse and do personal attacks?
Pages:
Jump to: