Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 130. (Read 450482 times)
There was a recent shooting seem there is one everyday I'm sure most don't get reported. Maybe we should limit the number of bullets per gun to 2 really small size ones.
The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Use of guns in self-defense and self-determination (suicide) are both human rights, and not a problem for anyone but an aggressor. Remove those from the statistics and suddenly you find out that countless more numbers of people die every year because they were {il}legally disarmed for violent criminals' safety.
Look at South Korea, Japan, and other countries with extremely strict gun laws, they don't experience mass killings like our lovely gun slanging Cowboys here.
Yes, those comparatively smaller nations with almost totally homogeneous races and cultures certainly does prove your point about a nation of 300+ million people with thousands of different races, cultures, and religions. I am convinced!
The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Use of guns in self-defense and self-determination (suicide) are both human rights, and not a real problem for anyone but an aggressor. Remove those from the statistics and suddenly you find out that countless more numbers of people die every year because they were {il}legally disarmed for violent criminals' safety.
Look at South Korea, Japan, and other countries with extremely strict gun laws, they don't experience mass killings like our lovely gun slanging Cowboys here.
I'm sure the victims in those countries thank you for revising all their mass killings out of history then. 
/ignore The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Use of guns in self-defense and self-determination (suicide) are both human rights, and not a problem for anyone but an aggressor. Remove those from the statistics and suddenly you find out that countless more numbers of people die every year because they were {il}legally disarmed for violent criminals' safety.
Look at South Korea, Japan, and other countries with extremely strict gun laws, they don't experience mass killings like our lovely gun slanging Cowboys here.
The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Use of guns in self-defense and self-determination (suicide) are both human rights, and not a real problem for anyone but an aggressor. Remove those from the statistics and suddenly you find out that countless more numbers of people die every year because they were {il}legally disarmed for violent criminals' safety.
Everyone should be able to carry as long as they don't have mental illness or are a criminal.
Real criminals (victimful ones) and real mentally ill people (ones who derive pleasure from making innocents suffer) are never kept from carrying guns. Only victimless criminals (jaywalkers) and those politically abused by psychiatry (who think making innocents suffer is wrong).
The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Everyone should be able to carry as long as they don't have mental illness or are a criminal.
Its proven that you are safer if you carry a gun, you can prevent crimes.
Its proven that you are safer if you carry a gun, you can prevent crimes.
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
And tell me Mr. I have it all figured out from a socialist nation half a world away...
What is stopping those tests, doctors, and exams from being bias and regulating gun ownership out of existence? You ever hear of gulags? The state said those people were insane too. History shows us they simply had the wrong kind of opinions, and the government decided to regulate them out of existence. Tell me, exactly why should we trust the government to regulate firearm ownership when firearm ownership is designed to protect us from the government? Isn't that a bit like having the fox guarding the hen house?
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
This is evidence that you don't understand the fact that psychological examination results are all in the bias of the examiner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry
Actors and actresses are not exactly experts on firearms, home invasions, police techniques, law, constitutional rights, or many other subjects.
At the same time, the portrayal of firearms in movies is very, very different than in reality. Often they magically hit what they are pointed at every time, if in the hands of a good guy, and have huge magazine capacities, as many shots as are needed to make the scene. Usually the machine guns miss the good guys, while the good guys snub nose 38 hits the target on the first shot at fifty yards.
So there are things actors could and should say. "Don't believe the real world of accuracy in firing a gun is what you see in the movies." Many other similar things. But that they don't indicates how little they understand....
Uncertain. Many "gun control"/criminal safety advocates own all the guns they can buy or steal, and think they are the animals more equal than others, while every law-abiding, drug/alcohol-free, mentally-sound person who can't bribe their way out from under "gun control" should get murdered/raped/maimed with impunity while disarmed.
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
This is evidence that you don't understand the fact that psychological examination results are all in the bias of the examiner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry
Uncertain. Many "gun control"/criminal safety advocates own all the guns they can buy or steal, and think they are the animals more equal than others, while every law-abiding, drug/alcohol-free, mentally-sound person who can't bribe their way out from under "gun control" should get murdered/raped/maimed with impunity while disarmed.
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
If everyone thinks like you, things are just fine. But the minute someone thinks differently than you, you are using your freedom to take their freedom away, if you implement your form of gun control.
Don't have any guns if you don't like. But let those of your neighbors who want guns to have them. Your neighbors will protect you when necessary.
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
This is evidence that you don't understand the fact that psychological examination results are all in the bias of the examiner.
Gun control is fine if it's regulated and everything is controlled. It's kind of similar to drugs - if you ban them, people will still go and get them another way. An illegal way. Guns can be protective, but again, you need to regulate it and have people perform tests and psychological exams before they get the guns. Otherwise, it's not okay.
Gun control is a most important in the entire world countries. Mostly western countries need very strong regulations. Bitcoin is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change.
WTF is "the entire world countries?" You mean everywhere? Also why is is "Mostly western countries need very strong regulations."? I don't see any reasoning here just you listing your half baked opinions.
"CASH is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change."
I changed the emboldened part for you to point out how senseless your argument is, because people don't need Bitcoin for anonymous transactions. Also, something stinks around here... do you guys also smell burning shill?
And more important than gun freedom is, FREEDOM. Gun freedom in America exists to back up freedom of speech, and both of them exist to maintain FREEDOM.
Jokers like n0ne need to remain in their countries of slavery.
Gun control is a most important in the entire world countries. Mostly western countries need very strong regulations. Bitcoin is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change.
WTF is "the entire world countries?" You mean everywhere? Also why is is "Mostly western countries need very strong regulations."? I don't see any reasoning here just you listing your half baked opinions.
"CASH is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change."
I changed the emboldened part for you to point out how senseless your argument is, because people don't need Bitcoin for anonymous transactions. Also, something stinks around here... do you guys also smell burning shill?
Gun control is a most important in the entire world countries. Mostly western countries need very strong regulations. Bitcoin is also used for gun purchase. This will encourage anonymous buying. Such scenario need to change.
Yes people's militia is great idea but this is unacceptable for government.
Because they can't control this army.
This is why they won't let this happen, this is why they will collect every piece of gun..
Because they don't have full power over people.
Because they can't control this army.
This is why they won't let this happen, this is why they will collect every piece of gun..
Because they don't have full power over people.
Yeah let's go back to the good all Far West.
Everyone apply his own law. It'll be much better!
I mean why even applying those fucking laws they vote in Washington?
Useless! They can't know better than us what's good for our community!
Huh? Almost all the laws that affect people in the USA are state laws. Including the gun laws.
#TheEuropeanGuyGotCrashedForThinkingHeKnewButInFactHeDidn't
Which in turn means he didn't understand a huge part of the issue. The fact that "pro gun control" means the taking of this set of law and powers from the states.
At the practical level, states operate to a degree as "policy laboratories." Valta does not get this he thinks he can talk about statistics US vs other country, US as a uniform whole. He has no clue of New Mexico vs Boston, Alaska vs NY City. One would think it's not a bad idea to "get a clue."
Or two.
Yes people's militia is great idea but this is unacceptable for government.
Because they can't control this army.
This is why they won't let this happen, this is why they will collect every piece of gun..
Because they don't have full power over people.
Because they can't control this army.
This is why they won't let this happen, this is why they will collect every piece of gun..
Because they don't have full power over people.
Yeah let's go back to the good all Far West.
Everyone apply his own law. It'll be much better!
I mean why even applying those fucking laws they vote in Washington?
Useless! They can't know better than us what's good for our community!
Huh? Almost all the laws that affect people in the USA are state laws. Including the gun laws.
Proof of secessionist states going back on what they ratified, the supreme law of the land, the US Constitution.
Yes people's militia is great idea but this is unacceptable for government.
Because they can't control this army.
This is why they won't let this happen, this is why they will collect every piece of gun..
Because they don't have full power over people.
Because they can't control this army.
This is why they won't let this happen, this is why they will collect every piece of gun..
Because they don't have full power over people.
Yeah let's go back to the good all Far West.
Everyone apply his own law. It'll be much better!
I mean why even applying those fucking laws they vote in Washington?
Useless! They can't know better than us what's good for our community!
Huh? Almost all the laws that affect people in the USA are state laws. Including the gun laws.
#TheEuropeanGuyGotCrashedForThinkingHeKnewButInFactHeDidn't
Jump to: