The real reason why atheists hate religion is, the devil has blinded their minds to the truth.
We don't hate it. We're just not interested in it. We're more interested in things that deal with facts.
No, you hate it. How do we know? You are unwilling to compare the dictionary definition of "religion" to atheism and see that atheism is a religion.
Jeez, dude! Have it your way. Call it however you want. Still we're not interested in it. That important detail escapes you still.
This doesn't escape me at all. The fact that you would rather live in a science fiction world than in a world of reality doesn't escape me at all.
Riiiiight. Cause God made cars, computers and everything you use in your house.
Essentially yes. And maybe precisely yes. Cause and effect is in everything, going back to the beginning.
Notice that you are attributing far greater abilities to God than I am. You say that His 14 billion year cause and effect made these things, while I say it was only a little over 6,000 years. You might be able to hit the cue ball and get the sixth ball into the prescribed pocket, but try doing it with more than 10,000,000 balls.
Still didn't explain why carbon datation isn't reliable.
Funny how you take only what you want?
I just answered this in a different thread. I am not supposed to know the why's of everything just like you aren't. Research it for the data so that you can see the facts that carbon dating is flawed.
Flawed to the point that it's 50k years false? Same goes for EVERY radioactive element we know and use?
The liter science and physics isn't flawed. It works just like it should. The things that are flawed is how we interpret that data, and how we use the science itself.
Data is crystal clear. Most radioactive datation gives data proving objects and earths are millions of years old! And you would make us believe it's only 6k years old?
Common what you're saying is plain nonsense! If the physics is correct then we can't be dozens of millions of years wrong EVERY TIME...
Actually, that is man's interpretation of the data. People forget (intentionally) that there is no way to take into account natural C-14 activity in the past, because nobody was there measuring the C-14 data as it happened. In addition, because of the carbon dating that has been proven to be false, the best that carbon dating might be is a better interpretation of things that we know the near date of through other methods.
In other words, carbon dating is all guesswork regarding the dates that are being interpreted from the results evidence.
So for you carbon radioactive activity is few thousands time slower today than 5k years ago? And this regardless of concentrations (as we take same concentrations samples to compare activities) so without any reason the activity decreased by four orders of magnitude without any reason?
