Superstition is the belief in the supernatural. Things are listed as "supernatural" by scientists because they can't explain them.
Nope, not even close. I can very clearly articulately for you why there is no such thing as talking snakes, winged sky humans, and invisible sky fathers.
It's all basic physics and biology, really. For example winged humans wouldn't be able to fly as our lift-to-mass ratio would never be high enough. Bones too dense.
I'm wondering if you've heard the news that Einstein's Theory of Relativity has been debunked...
Eric P Dollard[Transcribed from the spoken word]
[Excerpts]
Finally, it has been disclosed by insiders within the space program, NASA, of a “certain complication”. It was found that when far outside the Earth’s field of influence the stars and sun are NOT VISIBLE! However, the Earth and the Moon are plainly visible. There is no direct light in outer space, only that made visible by gross physical matter. This gives rise to an important question, does the “light” from the sun propagate with a velocity at all, or is it simply a function of time? The “time delay” may be no more than a hysteresis of the luminiferous aether.
Einstein is a false prophet. The Theory of Relativity as the “Holy Scripture” is like a televangelistic sales pitch. Nikola Tesla regarded Relativity as the greatest historical aberration of scientific thought. Relativity is no more than a philosophical standpoint, a virus to infect a “New Age”.
This has now become inordinately overcomplicated, but thru the lawyer style skill of the Einsteinian Physicists all terms are erased that do not fit the chosen idea. It may be inferred that A. Einstein was not much of a mathematician, and by ignoring J. J. Thompson he was not much of a scientist. Not a mathematician, not a scientist, not an engineer, so just what was Albert Einstein anyway? He was a Mystic.
[But]: The mystical experience is the force which moves one to science.
One very important fact that escapes notice (Meyl, et al) is that Tesla’s transmission networks are Mono-Polar. The dipolar concepts so dear to all now swirl down the toilet bowl. Forget Bearden, forget Meyl, it is crap for the crapper! Tesla circumvents the concept of plus and minus, there is one pole only –plus. Here is a true “Single Phase” Alternating Current, one wire only. This is a philosophically disruptive concept for the God vs. Devil duality. God has no opposite pole, it is one, positive only. This is the secret to the Tesla transmission concept. Action vs. Reaction now is voided.
Einstein and his theories can be expressed by an animal story: As understood thru his writing Relativity as a “package of ideas” is in many ways similar to the “egg of the cuckoo bird”. The cuckoo bird builds no nest of its own, it looks for the right nest among those other birds. Here found, it lays its egg in the selected nest of another bird. Upon hatching, its chick forces the others out of the nest, over the side. Such is the growth cycle of Relativity, as given by Einstein.
Consider Einstein’s statement on the same page 50:
“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory of itself is unable to give an account of their nature.”… “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.”
Forces of another kind, you mean the dielectric lines of force, removed from obscurity by the Faraday-Thompson concept of induction? Every electron is a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric lines of force, these lines contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving motion to the terminus electron. The thermionic electron contracts, pulling the electron, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the electron. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, both cases the electrons assume ray like motion, with non participating lines of force filling the voids, directing the electrons. Hence, it is the electrons travel in straight lines, that is, rays.
These facts have been known from the initial invention of the vacuum tube by Sir William Crookes, leading to the extensive experimental work into atomic science by J. J. Thompson and Nikola Tesla. It is here seen that the so-called electron is only a shadow, its apparent physical mass is only an electrical momentum. There is no rest mass to an electron. It is given here that the electron is no more than a broken-loose hold-fast under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in a half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Are we to believe that Einstein had no prior knowledge of the most prominent theoretical and experimental work of his time?
and yet "There are still some critics of relativity today (sometimes called "anti-relativists"),
