^^^ Your questions here just serve to muddy the waters; you're strawmaning my explanations.
1. The air is displaced by objects and it reacts by pushing the objects up or down depending on the objects density relative to the air. A PSI meter adjacent to an object can't measure the force created by the displacement; there's no correlation. Think about a helium balloon, what's pushing it up if not pressure from displaced air?
2. Trick question; weight is calculated using gravity. The force pushing your mother down could be converted to lbs but your intent to goad me into affirming gravity is clear.
3. See answer #1.
4. How does a helium balloon (let's pretend it's rectangular the size of the other bricks) know to go up? For the same reason the other bricks have different amounts of pressure on them; it's their density. The more dense a material is the higher the density of field lines entering its surface is.
1. Please report the measured PSI above the objects with different densities.
2. You don't have to use gravity, you can use a spring to hang heavy objects and record their weight using your scale and units. Why
more dense objects exert more force on the ground? Why the air pressure is pushing denser objects more than less denser objects? What causes air to detect heavier objects?
3. You did not answered the question. You said that the table down will be pushed by the air pressure, but air pressure will also exert force on the table bottom, so unless there is a pressure differential between table top and table bottom, the weight (the force exerted by the table on the floor) will be zero. But in reality there are no tables with zero weight.
4. What field are you talking about now? You said the air pressure pushes objects down to the ground.
Be careful what you say next. You said air is causing the force exerted on the ground, now you are saying the density is the cause.
1. You fail to understand the concept of force vectors, you're asking for a scalar quantity. This means you have no clue what you're asking or arguing about.
2. a) If we don't have to use gravity then what then where's argument? Gravity is literally an unproven theory required for the heliocentric model, the globe and ultimately atheism. b) I've answered the density question, it's the density of field lines entering the surface of the object.
3. I did, you're asking the wrong question; you need to check your assumptions.
4. OMG dude, the fucking electric field that's polarizing the air. I'm sorry but you're either being dishonest or your cognitive abilities are too weak to tackle this issue. I suspect dissonance is at play here.
I'm trying to explain (carefully) something that requires basic knowledge of calculus and vectors at the very least, you need to understand that some things have multiple qualities and causes. A basic vector for example has two quantities; magnitude and direction. You're asking for an explanation on running and jumping without an understanding of how walking works.
...
Uhh, no more complex answers, huh? Did your source run out of bullshit answers? Seems to me like you are giving up now.
As you can see above there seems to be an issue with the more complex answers...