Rev2 was released weeks ago and we still don't have a linux client. when is the ETA for a Rev2 linux client?
It sucks that one has to buy a windows license to use the latest version of XCurrency.
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 247. (Read 1484218 times)
October 01, 2014, 06:02:37 PM
October 01, 2014, 05:47:15 PM
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ?
Credits to KimmyF
This still blows my mind everytime I see it.
Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well...
Yes... if I squint my eyes and tilt my head slightly to the left I can discern the letters N O B L O A T.
October 01, 2014, 05:32:28 PM
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ?
Credits to KimmyF
This still blows my mind everytime I see it.
Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well...
I agree, not only is KimmyF's tool amazing, the visual representation of the transaction is quite impressive and show's how complex XC's mixing technology is.
October 01, 2014, 05:27:59 PM
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ?
Credits to KimmyF
This still blows my mind everytime I see it.
Can you imagine when we have a lot more xmixers running as well...
October 01, 2014, 05:08:25 PM
1000 XC, will take me forever! Oh well. Slow and steady.
October 01, 2014, 04:57:32 PM
hello can anyone help me?
i get 3 times less xc through multipool than it says in stats (0.25 xc per mhash x11) ,, is that becoz' unconfirmed shares or else?
i get 3 times less xc through multipool than it says in stats (0.25 xc per mhash x11) ,, is that becoz' unconfirmed shares or else?
You should be getting about 50% of that, due to the litecoinx shares not included
Dan
yes that is correct. thanks
October 01, 2014, 04:25:42 PM
Want some XC Illodin to begin your path to the light side ?
October 01, 2014, 04:20:20 PM
The node would have been an XMIXER
XMIXER requires 1000 XC,
XNODE requires 0?
Correct
October 01, 2014, 04:13:46 PM
The node would have been an XMIXER
XMIXER requires 1000 XC,
XNODE requires 0?
October 01, 2014, 04:05:16 PM
There is a topic about Coinshuffle on the front page of Reddit r/bitcoin, please upvote this XC post: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxfq1p
Synechist I posted your explanation of XCurrency (http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxhc9q?context=3) and someone asked me:
"I haven't quite grasped the scenario of 'what happens if a node that receives coins to mix just drops off the face of the Earth', what happens to those coins? How do you work around this?
Side note: you should also consider building in a timeout setting, such that a node involved in mixing cannot hold coins for more than X seconds or Y coins or Z transactions (or some combination); else, they could sit there collecting as many coins as possible and then walking off with them - unless there's some other mitigation to this already?
In short, how do you mitigate against rogue nodes? Yes you have mentioned something about kicking bad nodes out, but what's to prevent a rogue node from just re-spawning under a different ID?"
Can you give me a response to give them or post there directly?
Synechist I posted your explanation of XCurrency (http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxhc9q?context=3) and someone asked me:
"I haven't quite grasped the scenario of 'what happens if a node that receives coins to mix just drops off the face of the Earth', what happens to those coins? How do you work around this?
Side note: you should also consider building in a timeout setting, such that a node involved in mixing cannot hold coins for more than X seconds or Y coins or Z transactions (or some combination); else, they could sit there collecting as many coins as possible and then walking off with them - unless there's some other mitigation to this already?
In short, how do you mitigate against rogue nodes? Yes you have mentioned something about kicking bad nodes out, but what's to prevent a rogue node from just re-spawning under a different ID?"
Can you give me a response to give them or post there directly?
Interesting question but really thats how REV1 worked, REV2's trustless system doesn't allow a node to hold coins and "disappear" - since its an atomic transaction, so if the node drops off in the middle of the TX, then the TX fails and is banned.. Rogue/Bad nodes can't steal coins
If a node's connection crashes before it manages to sign, it's IP gets banned? One strike and you're out? Did the node have to have 500 XC or was it just the requirement for the xmixer?
There is a ban score actually and this system is being updated for rev3
The node would have been an XMIXER
October 01, 2014, 04:02:20 PM
There is a topic about Coinshuffle on the front page of Reddit r/bitcoin, please upvote this XC post: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxfq1p
Synechist I posted your explanation of XCurrency (http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxhc9q?context=3) and someone asked me:
"I haven't quite grasped the scenario of 'what happens if a node that receives coins to mix just drops off the face of the Earth', what happens to those coins? How do you work around this?
Side note: you should also consider building in a timeout setting, such that a node involved in mixing cannot hold coins for more than X seconds or Y coins or Z transactions (or some combination); else, they could sit there collecting as many coins as possible and then walking off with them - unless there's some other mitigation to this already?
In short, how do you mitigate against rogue nodes? Yes you have mentioned something about kicking bad nodes out, but what's to prevent a rogue node from just re-spawning under a different ID?"
Can you give me a response to give them or post there directly?
Synechist I posted your explanation of XCurrency (http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2hy9n5/presenting_coinshuffle_trustless_peertopeer/ckxhc9q?context=3) and someone asked me:
"I haven't quite grasped the scenario of 'what happens if a node that receives coins to mix just drops off the face of the Earth', what happens to those coins? How do you work around this?
Side note: you should also consider building in a timeout setting, such that a node involved in mixing cannot hold coins for more than X seconds or Y coins or Z transactions (or some combination); else, they could sit there collecting as many coins as possible and then walking off with them - unless there's some other mitigation to this already?
In short, how do you mitigate against rogue nodes? Yes you have mentioned something about kicking bad nodes out, but what's to prevent a rogue node from just re-spawning under a different ID?"
Can you give me a response to give them or post there directly?
Interesting question but really thats how REV1 worked, REV2's trustless system doesn't allow a node to hold coins and "disappear" - since its an atomic transaction, so if the node drops off in the middle of the TX, then the TX fails and is banned.. Rogue/Bad nodes can't steal coins
If a node's internet connection goes down / computer crashes before it manages to sign, it's IP gets banned? One strike and you're out?
And sorry I have dementia, but did the node have to have 500 XC or was it just the requirement for the xmixer?
October 01, 2014, 02:32:20 PM
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
Like this ?
Credits to KimmyF
October 01, 2014, 02:31:19 PM
Bump. Let's spread this folks.
Early testing of #XChat GROUP CHAT has begun! Here's to the future.
#XCurrency $XC #privacy #NSA
Twitter: https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/517369018475634688
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/XCurrency/posts/1553843411506227
Early testing of #XChat GROUP CHAT has begun! Here's to the future.
#XCurrency $XC #privacy #NSA
Twitter: https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/517369018475634688
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/XCurrency/posts/1553843411506227
October 01, 2014, 02:19:08 PM
Any chance we gonna do a custom Blockchain rather then using a general site?
How about it KimmyF?
October 01, 2014, 01:34:14 PM
Interesting question but really thats how REV1 worked, REV2's trustless system doesn't allow a node to hold coins and "disappear" - since its an atomic transaction, so if the node drops off in the middle of the TX, then the TX fails and is banned.. Rogue/Bad nodes can't steal coins
Understood. I knew you got the mixing working so it's trustless but I wasn't sure on the details of it.
Thanks Mr_Random. Nice one. Onto it...
P.S. Nodes received the whole transaction, not just the coins. They either sign the whole thing (thereby agreeing to forward coins) or opt out. There's no possibility of stealing.
P.S. Nodes received the whole transaction, not just the coins. They either sign the whole thing (thereby agreeing to forward coins) or opt out. There's no possibility of stealing.
Cheers.
I'll make a note of what you post on Reddit for future reference.
Only a pleasure.
For the future, some terms you could use where relevant are:
"atomic transaction" - i.e. one that can't be broken into parts, so that, say, coins can't be kept if other bits are left behind.
"multi-party signature transaction" - all parties need to sign in order for the tx to be valid, kind of like m-of-m multisig.
October 01, 2014, 01:29:17 PM
Yes and it will be decentralised - (Proof of Identity)
Now that is some cool stuff right there...looking forward!
October 01, 2014, 01:22:51 PM
Interesting question but really thats how REV1 worked, REV2's trustless system doesn't allow a node to hold coins and "disappear" - since its an atomic transaction, so if the node drops off in the middle of the TX, then the TX fails and is banned.. Rogue/Bad nodes can't steal coins
Understood. I knew you got the mixing working so it's trustless but I wasn't sure on the details of it.
Thanks Mr_Random. Nice one. Onto it...
P.S. Nodes received the whole transaction, not just the coins. They either sign the whole thing (thereby agreeing to forward coins) or opt out. There's no possibility of stealing.
P.S. Nodes received the whole transaction, not just the coins. They either sign the whole thing (thereby agreeing to forward coins) or opt out. There's no possibility of stealing.
Cheers.
I'll make a note of what you post on Reddit for future reference.
October 01, 2014, 01:17:24 PM
okay to use XChat, make a new local wallet address, then right click to get your Pubkey - those 2 values are what you share
however in an upcoming release, you can just use your alias/username
however in an upcoming release, you can just use your alias/username
Awesome; Thank you!
Yes and it will be decentralised - (Proof of Identity)
October 01, 2014, 01:16:36 PM
Dan I need to tell you something can you come in Xchat one sec?
sure - unless I'm building a new release, I leave XChat open 24/7
October 01, 2014, 01:16:00 PM
okay to use XChat, make a new local wallet address, then right click to get your Pubkey - those 2 values are what you share
however in an upcoming release, you can just use your alias/username
however in an upcoming release, you can just use your alias/username
Awesome; Thank you!
Jump to: