Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 244. (Read 1484189 times)

Here is your Bobsurplus aka EMC2WHALE......
(a dark holder doxed him not to long back)



http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom/1324-lexington-avenue-286-new-york-10128/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom-robert-bradley-bob-duskes-robert-bradley-duskes-used-to-646481

There is another question on web 3.0 not answered yet.

Synechist, people are starting to ask some good questions... Do your thing!

Edit - you beat me to it

And commented.

Nice one Battbot :-)

Upvoted.

Posted on r/Bitcoin because mesh networking is hot right now.

Please upvote:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2i3ksa/xcurrencys_revolutionary_privacy_advancement/

Nice one! Thanks for that. Gonna tweet it...

Heh. Yes I agree that a university physics degree isn't necessary to be a good physicist. I find his ideas interesting myself actually.

I'm not a physicist and don't claim to have a well-founded opinion on Haramein - and so I don't take my opinion seriously.

But for what it's worth, what led me to this (tentative) view is that Haramein posits that protons orbit each other. This is not how protons work; they don't "orbit" because they're spatially too indeterminate to do that sort of thing. So from this I assumed that while his ideas are appealing, in this respect - which is a key component of his theory - they've gone pretty drastically wrong.

I'm open to correction of course.

But let's chat about this elsewhere. It's not relevant to this thread. PM me?

Woah, woah....woah. Hold your horses, synechist. I don't think you want to open up this can of worms in this thread. I've taken several workshops on Nassim's theories.

Why might you say that Nassim is not a reputable physicist? Because he doesn't have a university physics degree by which his mind would have been conditioned to fall in line with the asinine assumptions of the world's university-educated physicists?

A degree is not necessary to qualify one as a reputable physicist, good sir. Nassim has some quite novel ideas that make more sense than anything I ever studied in my university physics classes.

http://www.wirelessnetworksonline.com/doc/xcurrency-revolutionary-privacy-advancement-trustless-mesh-networking-0001

Nassim video is more about physics and not numbers Marco rodin Vortex math is about math but is about physics as well. Vortex math does not base itself on functions with numbers organizing themselves around functions is the opposite. Numbers are fixed entities and functions can be organised around them>this create standard patterns that you can find in the structure of nature Dna galaxies etc. It is a radical and innovative approach.

They can be dismissed easilly as crack pottery but many in the past where quickly dismissed as well by the standard scientific consensus of the time to be recognised later on in their life or after they were dead. It is like that in society for each different area where radical innovative ideas are presented > same can be said for crypto as well.

Nassim is not an established scientist yet but has dedicated his life to physics even if he does not have a physics degree..>Einstein as well was working as an accountant or something similar while working on his theory of relativity.

Anyway Nassim has published a paper:

http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/AIP_CP_SProton_Haramein.pdf

Marco rodin math if understood I believe can be applied in Computer science and programming with leaps in advancement in this field. watch this playlists when you have a bit of time.. don't dismiss it without giving it a chance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbyc9JW3vtk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEE55gcttqo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNHvyTIRVjY

Just Found this one too see what you can take from it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxuU8jYkA1k

Thanks Killa, your post is most welcome.

Yes I did. The videos you sent me are not really about numbers though, they're about physics.

Nassim Haramein is not a reputable physicist. I haven't had time to look up Marko Rodin though because he doesn't have a Wikipedia page.

I think synechist is right. Everyone in this thread has his own scale of frustration to deal with. The attention that XC have had from the Crypto community is offensive to say the least..but then I think of the "crypto-community" is the crypto community the pump and dumpers of the last 4 months with new crypto shit appearing just to be used as a penny stock under steroids?

I see at the moment that Crypto is just a whale game for pump groups looking to scam and use the market to get richer and richer on the expense of others...maybe we did not get the attention we deserved because we might have broken their favorite game?

If XC goes up a lot it will start a trend of rewarding the best coins and their game is more and more predictable. Do you see that the best coins have been rewarded lately?

This off course will stop when the Market will wake up guided by professional investors looking to Invest their money where they see long term potential. Unfortunately they are not here yet.

I wish this was true, but I'm afraid I will have to disagree. XC is a far more mature product with full end to end anonymity. The XC mixer is what I consider to be the best in the business. I do hope that one day we are in competition with XC, but right now from a technical perspective XC is superior.

We have not hidden the fact that we would like to implement XC's mixer technology and have reached out to Dan.

I don't usually post in other currency's threads, but felt I had to for this one.

Regards
Killa

That couldn't be further from the truth. Have you seen the sheer amount of crypto-specific press XC is getting? We pretty much ONLY focus on the crypto-community.

Furthermore, the official launch will be as much focussed on the crypto community as it always has been, PLUS mainstream marketing.

I'm sympathetic to your view and have given my reasons why the approach I've taken has been focussed on the crypto-community for now. I know you're frustrated but please stop ranting about this. I get your view. I agree with you that simplifying communications will appeal to a broader audience. I agree that some crypto-people are not technically minded. And I've tried to explain why XC was not in a position to do that before now. You're welcome to continue to disagree but I don't think there's anything in this that we haven't already discussed here.

what product? how about the fucking altcoin that launched the moment the first block been mined.
You know what establishes credibility like nothing else. A big Community. You wanna skip the crypto-community and jump right to those stupid instagramm hipsters? those idiots who want "goverments to control the cruel free markets ". whatever.

The fruit of your approach will be a high scale Code Review. i'm shure since you are really good at what you do. still think you should soften your focus on distinctive periods of perception and target groups.  Its to black and white for me.
hope to see the Review soon since this could have the potential to catapult us to a status quo within this crypto community i'd desire before the big "launch" for the mainstream.

we should try more to conquer the crypto-stream before the mainstream thats all I'm saying.

Arlyn did you watch the Videos on Vortex math? 

Sounds perfect. You'll stake from time to time with no problems.

Open your wallet about once every four days, if not more often. Enjoy!

What product? There are no mobile apps, XChat's group chat is in testing, Privacy Mode's backend tech has only just been completed. We haven't even launched yet.

"Mainstream" is people who use phones and computers. 99% of them have no idea what crypto even is.

As for your thinking that the prior releases should've been worded more simply, I refer back to my earlier comments: (a) we needed to establish XC's credibility, not its saleability, and (b) we were explaining technical stuff. The style of those releases was tailored for that.

Actual, mature products that people can use will be marketed accordingly.