Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 245. (Read 1484218 times)

newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
The node would have been an XMIXER

XMIXER requires 1000 XC,
XNODE requires 0?

Correct

What is the default? I have 1001 XC but the mining icon is green and it says "Minting" (and the elusive reward is *always* 15-20 hours way).
Is it necessary to have "-distmix-autonode" to be XNODE? I remember that was suggested 2-3 weeks ago, but I don't know which mode is better now.

-distmix-autonode is to be an Xmixer.

Every node (including Xmixers) are Xnodes, since they all use the end-to-end encrypted, serverless Xnode protocol.

For a normal node, you need no minimum balance and you shouldn't run -distmix-autonode.

For staking, don't run an Xmixer. For transaction fees, run an XMixer.





All right, thank you.  Now I do not have -distmix-autonode but I'm mining. That's something I don't understand.
My shortcut has a few addnode + one maxconnections parameter, that's all.
I'm on v0.9.2.49.08.XCurrency-REV2.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.
I agree, we need more volume, otherwise people might start leaving XC and that will result in a price drop that XC will probably not recover from.

I don't think that's true. XC's tech is so strong that the price at any given point is completely unimportant. Tech like this is incredibly valuable; it's just a matter of when external factors coincide to facilitate the price coming to reflect its true value.


define external factor please. Just do me a favor and keep the PR releases more in peoples language . Probably stupid language to your standards  Wink. will do wonders to grow the community.
We had this discussion a few pages back if you wanna check it out.

External factors: Bitcoin's downtrend, Summer, FUD, etc.

Yes, I've been reading up on the past few pages and it's a pity I missed that conversation. It's valuable to me to hear how people experience XC's PR.

I agree that "people's language" is more accessible, and this will be important when XC starts marketing XChat. The focus in the past has been to establish the following:
- XC's legitimacy
- The superiority of XC's tech
- an understanding of XC's tech

This, in my opinion, is best done by writing in a more formal and academic style. Such a style addresses security experts and the intellectual cryptographer community, and its tone is professional, serious, and clear.

In contrast, marketing XChat would be done in an entirely different way, in simple, friendly, normal language. But since we haven't launched, this is a phase XC has not entered yet.



I think security experts and Intelectual cryptographers while important to reach don't make or break a coin. people do. the tech is important but not all. its also about momentum and group dynamics and you won't get that to XC by catering the PR to such a small elite group alone. i feel people start to develope a defensive stance to XC  because of that.

I think the currency is just as or even more an everyday lifestyle product like the Chat so please consider adapting some of your laid out marketing concepts for Xchat also for XCurrency ( XPay ? )

I agree completely with all of that.

The only thing I would add is that marketing is a narrative. It has structure. You cannot start anywhere, you have to start where a brand is at.

When I started on "X11coin", the task was to establish its legitimacy after the avalanche of FUD its had endured had subsided. What has resulted is XCurrency as we know it today: a tech leader. The task was legitimacy and tech-oriented. Hence the style of the PR.

It would have made no sense to engage in normal/friendly "buy our product" type of communication, because the public had no trust in X11coin at that stage.

Furthermore, XC's roadmap has its own narrative: first the foundation (Xnodes, multipath, meshnet...), and then the mainstream-friendly apps. We're not at the mainstream stage yet, and so the marketing hasn't started.

I appreciate your frustration at the price's stability. It's frustrating to me too that it hasn't gone up 1000% as it ought to. But XC is a long-term investment. It's a matter of when, not if. And the mainstream-friendly marketing in "normal" language will come.


It would have gone up way more with a little normal/friendly "buy our product" mixed in. I sometimes have the impression you guys think you can just put on a switch and "maintream" adoption will kick in. If you can pull that of . Respect. would be a first timer.
How do you define the mainstream. people that are not into crypto yet? bitcoin only users? I'm not frsutrated with the price so much as with the lack of community growth.

You know who knows XC as the tech leader right now. the same ten dudes in here writing back and forth about how great XC is wondering why nobody seems to realise.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
The node would have been an XMIXER

XMIXER requires 1000 XC,
XNODE requires 0?

Correct

What is the default? I have 1001 XC but the mining icon is green and it says "Minting" (and the elusive reward is *always* 15-20 hours way).
Is it necessary to have "-distmix-autonode" to be XNODE? I remember that was suggested 2-3 weeks ago, but I don't know which mode is better now.

-distmix-autonode is to be an Xmixer.

Every node (including Xmixers) are Xnodes, since they all use the end-to-end encrypted, serverless Xnode protocol.

For a normal node, you need no minimum balance and you shouldn't run -distmix-autonode.

For staking, don't run an Xmixer. For transaction fees, run an XMixer.

newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
The node would have been an XMIXER

XMIXER requires 1000 XC,
XNODE requires 0?

Correct

What is the default? I have 1001 XC but the mining icon is green and it says "Minting" (and the elusive reward is *always* 15-20 hours way).
Is it necessary to have "-distmix-autonode" to be XNODE? I remember that was suggested 2-3 weeks ago, but I don't know which mode is better now.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.
I agree, we need more volume, otherwise people might start leaving XC and that will result in a price drop that XC will probably not recover from.

I don't think that's true. XC's tech is so strong that the price at any given point is completely unimportant. Tech like this is incredibly valuable; it's just a matter of when external factors coincide to facilitate the price coming to reflect its true value.


define external factor please. Just do me a favor and keep the PR releases more in peoples language . Probably stupid language to your standards  Wink. will do wonders to grow the community.
We had this discussion a few pages back if you wanna check it out.

External factors: Bitcoin's downtrend, Summer, FUD, etc.

Yes, I've been reading up on the past few pages and it's a pity I missed that conversation. It's valuable to me to hear how people experience XC's PR.

I agree that "people's language" is more accessible, and this will be important when XC starts marketing XChat. The focus in the past has been to establish the following:
- XC's legitimacy
- The superiority of XC's tech
- an understanding of XC's tech

This, in my opinion, is best done by writing in a more formal and academic style. Such a style addresses security experts and the intellectual cryptographer community, and its tone is professional, serious, and clear.

In contrast, marketing XChat would be done in an entirely different way, in simple, friendly, normal language. But since we haven't launched, this is a phase XC has not entered yet.



I think security experts and Intelectual cryptographers while important to reach don't make or break a coin. people do. the tech is important but not all. its also about momentum and group dynamics and you won't get that to XC by catering the PR to such a small elite group alone. i feel people start to develope a defensive stance to XC  because of that.

I think the currency is just as or even more an everyday lifestyle product like the Chat so please consider adapting some of your laid out marketing concepts for Xchat also for XCurrency ( XPay ? )


being able to independently verify apparently trustless anon tech is exactly what will make the coin. The very nature of what XC is trying to do relies on people being able to verify it.

They also are trusted because of their skills and abilities, one could argue very strongly that these security experts have the most amount of people listening and trusting their opinions .

Do you listen to someone who is an amateur crypto investor trading 0.1 btc here and there saying "BUY THIS COIN"

Or if someone gives you clear precise reasons to invest in a coin and has also invested a large amount themselves and have been doing it for years.

Which one has the most follows and people that trust their opinion?


When Dan reviewed codes for other anon coins, He was a single person, his single action created buzz and price and volume increases to any coin he reviewed , This was a single person, that after reviewing caused the "group" to act accordingly. the security experts and the group dynamics go hand in hand with each other, The more skilled a person is, the more people follow and listen, meaning the information is spread to a larger group of people.

legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.
I agree, we need more volume, otherwise people might start leaving XC and that will result in a price drop that XC will probably not recover from.

I don't think that's true. XC's tech is so strong that the price at any given point is completely unimportant. Tech like this is incredibly valuable; it's just a matter of when external factors coincide to facilitate the price coming to reflect its true value.


define external factor please. Just do me a favor and keep the PR releases more in peoples language . Probably stupid language to your standards  Wink. will do wonders to grow the community.
We had this discussion a few pages back if you wanna check it out.

External factors: Bitcoin's downtrend, Summer, FUD, etc.

Yes, I've been reading up on the past few pages and it's a pity I missed that conversation. It's valuable to me to hear how people experience XC's PR.

I agree that "people's language" is more accessible, and this will be important when XC starts marketing XChat. The focus in the past has been to establish the following:
- XC's legitimacy
- The superiority of XC's tech
- an understanding of XC's tech

This, in my opinion, is best done by writing in a more formal and academic style. Such a style addresses security experts and the intellectual cryptographer community, and its tone is professional, serious, and clear.

In contrast, marketing XChat would be done in an entirely different way, in simple, friendly, normal language. But since we haven't launched, this is a phase XC has not entered yet.



I think security experts and Intelectual cryptographers while important to reach don't make or break a coin. people do. the tech is important but not all. its also about momentum and group dynamics and you won't get that to XC by catering the PR to such a small elite group alone. i feel people start to develope a defensive stance to XC  because of that.

I think the currency is just as or even more an everyday lifestyle product like the Chat so please consider adapting some of your laid out marketing concepts for Xchat also for XCurrency ( XPay ? )

I agree completely with all of that.

The only thing I would add is that marketing is a narrative. It has structure. You cannot start anywhere, you have to start where a brand is at.

When I started on "X11coin", the task was to establish its legitimacy after the avalanche of FUD its had endured had subsided. What has resulted is XCurrency as we know it today: a tech leader. The task was legitimacy and tech-oriented. Hence the style of the PR.

It would have made no sense to engage in normal/friendly "buy our product" type of communication, because the public had no trust in X11coin at that stage.

Furthermore, XC's roadmap has its own narrative: first the foundation (Xnodes, multipath, meshnet...), and then the mainstream-friendly apps. We're not at the mainstream stage yet, and so the marketing hasn't started.

I appreciate your frustration at the price's stability. It's frustrating to me too that it hasn't gone up 1000% as it ought to. But XC is a long-term investment. It's a matter of when, not if. And the mainstream-friendly marketing in "normal" language will come.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.
I agree, we need more volume, otherwise people might start leaving XC and that will result in a price drop that XC will probably not recover from.

I don't think that's true. XC's tech is so strong that the price at any given point is completely unimportant. Tech like this is incredibly valuable; it's just a matter of when external factors coincide to facilitate the price coming to reflect its true value.


define external factor please. Just do me a favor and keep the PR releases more in peoples language . Probably stupid language to your standards  Wink. will do wonders to grow the community.
We had this discussion a few pages back if you wanna check it out.

External factors: Bitcoin's downtrend, Summer, FUD, etc.

Yes, I've been reading up on the past few pages and it's a pity I missed that conversation. It's valuable to me to hear how people experience XC's PR.

I agree that "people's language" is more accessible, and this will be important when XC starts marketing XChat. The focus in the past has been to establish the following:
- XC's legitimacy
- The superiority of XC's tech
- an understanding of XC's tech

This, in my opinion, is best done by writing in a more formal and academic style. Such a style addresses security experts and the intellectual cryptographer community, and its tone is professional, serious, and clear.

In contrast, marketing XChat would be done in an entirely different way, in simple, friendly, normal language. But since we haven't launched, this is a phase XC has not entered yet.



I think security experts and Intelectual cryptographers while important to reach don't make or break a coin. people do. the tech is important but not all. its also about momentum and group dynamics and you won't get that to XC by catering the PR to such a small elite group alone. i feel people start to develope a defensive stance to XC  because of that.

I think the currency is just as or even more an everyday lifestyle product like the Chat so please consider adapting some of your laid out marketing concepts for Xchat also for XCurrency ( XPay ? )
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.
I agree, we need more volume, otherwise people might start leaving XC and that will result in a price drop that XC will probably not recover from.

I don't think that's true. XC's tech is so strong that the price at any given point is completely unimportant. Tech like this is incredibly valuable; it's just a matter of when external factors coincide to facilitate the price coming to reflect its true value.


define external factor please. Just do me a favor and keep the PR releases more in peoples language . Probably stupid language to your standards  Wink. will do wonders to grow the community.
We had this discussion a few pages back if you wanna check it out.

External factors: Bitcoin's downtrend, Summer, FUD, etc.

Yes, I've been reading up on the past few pages and it's a pity I missed that conversation. It's valuable to me to hear how people experience XC's PR.

I agree that "people's language" is more accessible, and this will be important when XC starts marketing XChat. The focus in the past has been to establish the following:
- XC's legitimacy
- The superiority of XC's tech
- an understanding of XC's tech

This, in my opinion, is best done by writing in a more formal and academic style. Such a style addresses security experts and the intellectual cryptographer community, and its tone is professional, serious, and clear.

In contrast, marketing XChat would be done in an entirely different way, in simple, friendly, normal language. But since we haven't launched, this is a phase XC has not entered yet.

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.
I agree, we need more volume, otherwise people might start leaving XC and that will result in a price drop that XC will probably not recover from.

I don't think that's true. XC's tech is so strong that the price at any given point is completely unimportant. Tech like this is incredibly valuable; it's just a matter of when external factors coincide to facilitate the price coming to reflect its true value.


define external factor please. Just do me a favor and keep the PR releases more in peoples language . Probably stupid language to your standards  Wink. will do wonders to grow the community.
We had this discussion a few pages back if you wanna check it out.
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Does it matter what the price is today if long term fundamentals are good, and the value-add of the coin is increasing?   It is just a matter of time before the rest of the market sees things the way we do.  I really like the graphic that was done by someone here with the picture of androids using an Xcurrency ATM.  It really hit home how strong our product, marketing, branding and name is.  As someone mentioned during the week it was the damage done earlier while we were X11 which is holding things back for us, its only a matter of time before the rest of the market forgets/forgives this understands exactly where we are at and what we are trying to achieve.  It only would take a few more enquiries from cash rich, DRK investors to switch over to get things moving.  I remember when I first bought in I had no idea that my own purchasing was contributing to pushing the market up to 160K, when I stopped buying it dropped almost instantly.  The very small amount of bitcoin I was adding to the market made a big difference.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
But to clarify: your node only mixes transactions when you make a payment. So it wouldn't get rated at all unless you were continually making payments.

When your node is supposed to relay a fragment (transaction or chat message), but stalls, is it downgraded then as well?

Yes it would be downgraded if it stalls - though chat messages don't get fragmented, and nor do they get mixed, so the rating system doesn't apply to XChat. But an occasional stall will not get you into trouble.

XChat is based only on the Xnode protocol, which is end-to-end encryption. This is important because chat messages should not get stored on the blockchain, as this would be a privacy risk (and it would bloat the chain).

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
if you think price will not change why do you still hold XC?

because i know that before/after rev2.5 price will rise to ~170k like after rev2 , and then i will sell, because later in 1-2 weeks price will reach 130 again... i will reqoute this message for you then Wink

Remember we're having an ITO. The price will not remain where it is.


I like this coin really much and im still holding, but i cant listen talkings like that, because im reading this everyday about 3-4 months (exept pump to 300k in July) Smiley
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
if you think price will not change why do you still hold XC?

because i know that before/after rev2.5 price will rise to ~170k like after rev2 , and then i will sell, because later in 1-2 weeks price will reach 130 again... i will reqoute this message for you then Wink

cool and then you buy back in at 130?

legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
if you think price will not change why do you still hold XC?

because i know that before/after rev2.5 price will rise to ~170k like after rev2 , and then i will sell, because later in 1-2 weeks price will reach 130 again... i will reqoute this message for you then Wink

Remember we're having an ITO. The price will not remain where it is.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
if you think price will not change why do you still hold XC?

because i know that before/after rev2.5 price will rise to ~170k like after rev2 , and then i will sell, because later in 1-2 weeks price will reach 130 again... i will reqoute this message for you then Wink
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
But to clarify: your node only mixes transactions when you make a payment. So it wouldn't get rated at all unless you were continually making payments.

When your node is supposed to relay a fragment (transaction or chat message), but stalls, is it downgraded then as well?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
if you think price will not change why do you still hold XC?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Oh i forgot. its a long term investment. so our pathetic volume right now is something to joke about cause at least our little group of buddys can use group chat now.

Remeber mintpal is down for 24hours

oh give me a break with f***ng mintpal. doesn't hurt others that much.

Market is rigged too many shit coins. Xc will bring back sanity after rev3

you and others said the same before rev2 : "xc will be huge after rev2" , "volume will increase, price will rise" and bla bla bla. I said that price will be the same. Adn what we see now? price is the same like before rev2 and volume is awful Smiley so i dont think that it will change very after rev3. and i remenber that devs said that we will see rev3 in autumn, but i dont think so Wink  because its second month on autumn and we dont have date of rev2.5...
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
So if my Internet drops out while I am mixing, I get banned and I can't send XC anymore?

Or am I wrong here? Please explain this a bit better.

No. Dan stated on the previous page that there's a rating system, and nodes that don't sign a transaction get downrated.

Also, this system is being upgraded for Rev 3.

Finally this system is not to ensure the security of your coins, since nodes that drop out can't steal anything (i.e. security is no issue). Rather, the rating system is to prevent DOS attacks on the network. Nodes that attempt to systematically and intentionally drop out of the network get downrated and therefore can't continue to do so.



Will the nodes get blacklisted if rating drops too low? Does living in a South American country with bad internet going to affect nodes?
Will nodes be upgraded with each successful transaction?

You'll have to ask Dan about the details of the ratings system, but if your node's internet connection keeps dropping out it would effectively be a DOS attack on XC's network, and so your node would get downrated.

But to clarify: your node only mixes transactions when you make a payment. So it wouldn't get rated at all unless you were continually making payments.

sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
So if my Internet drops out while I am mixing, I get banned and I can't send XC anymore?

Or am I wrong here? Please explain this a bit better.

No. Dan stated on the previous page that there's a rating system, and nodes that don't sign a transaction get downrated.

Also, this system is being upgraded for Rev 3.

Finally this system is not to ensure the security of your coins, since nodes that drop out can't steal anything (i.e. security is no issue). Rather, the rating system is to prevent DOS attacks on the network. Nodes that attempt to systematically and intentionally drop out of the network get downrated and therefore can't continue to do so.



Will the nodes get blacklisted if rating drops too low? Does living in a South American country with bad internet going to affect nodes?
Will nodes be upgraded with each successful transaction?
Jump to: