Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 499. (Read 1484191 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
so quiet here.

any new updates today?

Scheduled for today is the release of further details regarding the joint development (w/ QBK) collaboration on a revenue-generating wallet feature.

But, yeah, it's quiet here today. We haven't heard from Synechist in a couple days either. Hopefully that means he's been busy fixing up some delicious news for us.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
so quiet here.

any new updates today?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Announcement? not 2359PM Us time please
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
The problem with my XC is, is that I bought them on 240k and on 144k, so higher than the price currently is, I am just hoping the price will ever go above that again, I assume it will, but still.

Take this time to learn about crypto in general. You were asking some very basic questions about reading charts and even what "decentralized" meant. I get it, we all need to start somewhere but those are the types of things you want to know about before you lay down your hard-earned money on an investment.
That is true, I just can't find any good tutorials.

The problem with my XC is, is that I bought them on 240k and on 144k, so higher than the price currently is, I am just hoping the price will ever go above that again, I assume it will, but still.

Even selling your coins for less then you bought can still make you money. Sounds weird but it is true
How do you plan on doing that? Selling for less almost always makes you a loss.

If I buy 10 XCurrency for 240k and sell at 200k and buy back at 140k.

That's how
I guess, but that is very risky, because if you buy 10 XC at 240k sell at 200k and what if it goes up again? You sold at a loss with nowhere to go.

Price moves 180K-125k-180K for 2 months, I use this
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
good news ............................. Grin
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250

Only feature I personally would like to see XC add in this area of competences is a decentralized market to trade against btc from within the XC client. But this could end up doing harm as it would move the market away from exchange which currently is point of entry for many new investors.


in light of the fact that the exchanges are riddled with bots naked short selling and holding back investor momentum/price ...it would have to be a good thing. actually, what this community REALLY needs is a non-profit exchange that doesn't allow bots in with excessive orders. an exchange that has rigid standards for traded coins (transparency, reviewed sourcecode maybe ...no p&d's). it could further investor confidence tremendously and i truly believe that that is what it's going to take to attract much more money to this place.

i was so glad the tone of the thread was back to it's normal self this morning!  Wink cheerio

Interesting
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
a good place where we can ask to accept XC.

They are halting Fiat dollars from 2016:

http://www.coindesk.com/bullion-dealer-amagi-metals-stop-accepting-fiat-currency/


This is great news, imagine if more companies began dumping the FIAT for crypto.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100

Only feature I personally would like to see XC add in this area of competences is a decentralized market to trade against btc from within the XC client. But this could end up doing harm as it would move the market away from exchange which currently is point of entry for many new investors.


in light of the fact that the exchanges are riddled with bots naked short selling and holding back investor momentum/price ...it would have to be a good thing. actually, what this community REALLY needs is a non-profit exchange that doesn't allow bots in with excessive orders. an exchange that has rigid standards for traded coins (transparency, reviewed sourcecode maybe ...no p&d's). it could further investor confidence tremendously and i truly believe that that is what it's going to take to attract much more money to this place.

i was so glad the tone of the thread was back to it's normal self this morning!  Wink cheerio
full member
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.

How did you move it?  Did you go through Mintpal?   From this..., it doesn't show that you even moved your coins out from this address.   http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?68037.htm

Did you find the transaction that you moved the coins out from that address?

Yes, I moved through Mintpal which is the problem... Here is the transaction out of MP into rich list #8--- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?170570.htm


I can see that from the blockchain.  How about the transaction from #7 to Mintpal?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?68037.htm   This doesn't show the coins moving out.
#7 is my mintpal address. I moved them into "XSm81YR4..." Then I moved them out-- the transaction is shown in my last message and have them safely elsewhere now.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
i think XC is already a established coin now.

what we need now is a working mobile messaging app, which will certainly differentiate us from hundreds of altcoins.

and then comes next apps.

what do you guys think about?

but waiting is really painful!



You just have to hold out, bitcoin didn't reach 500 dollars in a day Wink
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
i think XC is already a established coin now.

what we need now is a working mobile messaging app, which will certainly differentiate us from hundreds of altcoins.

and then comes next apps.

what do you guys think about?

but waiting is really painful!



It doesn't matter. XC is good for long term holding. Every time I got the dumping, I am happy. My aim is to accumulate about 10k XC. Help me out getting more cheap XC.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.

How did you move it?  Did you go through Mintpal?   From this..., it doesn't show that you even moved your coins out from this address.   http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?68037.htm

Did you find the transaction that you moved the coins out from that address?

Yes, I moved through Mintpal which is the problem... Here is the transaction out of MP into rich list #8--- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?170570.htm


I can see that from the blockchain.  How about the transaction from #7 to Mintpal?

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?68037.htm   This doesn't show the coins moving out.
full member
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.

How did you move it?  Did you go through Mintpal?   From this..., it doesn't show that you even moved your coins out from this address.   http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?68037.htm

Did you find the transaction that you moved the coins out from that address?

Yes, I moved through Mintpal which is the problem... Here is the transaction out of MP into rich list #8--- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?170570.htm
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.

How did you move it?  Did you go through Mintpal?   From this..., it doesn't show that you even moved your coins out from this address.   http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?68037.htm

Did you find the transaction that you moved the coins out from that address?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.
XC and monero are explicitly challenging the position of lite and doge .i foresee their triumph.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.

you are right.

cuz some part of your holdings are staking in another address. i assumed that.

full member
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
seems http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich is not correct. I removed everything from address #7 into address #8 over a month ago!... LOL but they both show as having 2.03% of coins!! that disrupts the top 10 addresses by a pretty large margin making it look like the rich are holding more than actuality.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
i think XC is already a established coin now.

what we need now is a working mobile messaging app, which will certainly differentiate us from hundreds of altcoins.

and then comes next apps.

what do you guys think about?

but waiting is really painful!



Yea I think mobile app for sure hope it will come with rev2.5 and then decentralised exchange is a priority for me also but the waiting is killing me we had no updates anymore for rev2.5 since very long and the undisclosed privacy feature is still disclosed
Jump to: