Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1560. (Read 4670972 times)
August 12, 2014, 03:54:54 PM
My head hurts.
August 12, 2014, 03:47:38 PM
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.
I have already solved the problem on that goes until.
But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.
- Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
You forgot:
- Muh pruning decision of blockchaining therefore
August 12, 2014, 03:14:51 PM
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.
I have already solved the problem on that goes until.
But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.
- Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
August 12, 2014, 01:22:05 PM
We win
August 12, 2014, 01:11:41 PM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
ROTFHRMGFFD!
August 12, 2014, 01:10:39 PM
https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=257#p857
This version won't be untraceable (i.e. ring signatures with non-zero mixin) but it's still unlinkable (one-time addresses). However, they noted "the data structures were designed in such a way as to allow for untraceability via ringsigs in the future."
I wonder if it's possible to take what they have done and push it forward to make it untraceable. Is this a hard problem?
It is not trivial. We think it is solvable.
However, there is always a work around which is to surround the traceable transaction between two untraceable ones. (In some cases only one is needed.) That prevents tracing, though at some increased cost in transaction fees.
August 12, 2014, 01:06:56 PM
https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=257#p857
This version won't be untraceable (i.e. ring signatures with non-zero mixin) but it's still unlinkable (one-time addresses). However, they noted "the data structures were designed in such a way as to allow for untraceability via ringsigs in the future."
I wonder if it's possible to take what they have done and push it forward to make it untraceable. Is this a hard problem?
August 12, 2014, 01:01:31 PM
https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=257#p857
This version won't be untraceable (i.e. ring signatures with non-zero mixin) but it's still unlinkable (one-time addresses). However, they noted "the data structures were designed in such a way as to allow for untraceability via ringsigs in the future."
August 12, 2014, 12:35:03 PM
August 12, 2014, 12:22:03 PM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
Quote from: Santayana
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
I don't think you understand what's being said. When deciding to it goesing back up, far away becoming localized. Decisions making it look like more to anyone else can't be decided. I hope this clears up any misunderstanding, it's like english is your second language or something.
August 12, 2014, 12:14:57 PM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
How in the world did you guess my NXT 'secret phrase' ??
Triff ..
August 12, 2014, 12:03:27 PM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
August 12, 2014, 11:23:48 AM
How much hash/s do you need to get 1 XMR per day?
It would depend on difficulty - per http://dwarfpool.com/xmr/calc it looks like 1000h/s (1kh/s on the calculator) will net you around 1 XMR a day.
August 12, 2014, 11:14:52 AM
How much hash/s do you need to get 1 XMR per day?
August 12, 2014, 11:11:04 AM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
Quote from: Santayana
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
August 12, 2014, 10:23:46 AM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
August 12, 2014, 09:27:27 AM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
August 12, 2014, 06:33:03 AM
August 12, 2014, 05:38:48 AM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
August 12, 2014, 04:28:40 AM
The A/B testing and user experience sessions are fine and good practices in general. I just really disagree that privacy settings or some "mixin value" that the average user has no idea what it does, makes any sense to expose at the UI level for 95% of users. You are likely to confuse or sow doubt much more than educate or help them.
What are the reasons why anyone would ever select anything except the best mixing value? Does it cost something?
As smooth pointed out, it leads to a bigger transaction. Right now we're on fixed transaction fees, but once we move to a per-kb model that will change. The higher the mixin, the higher the fee.
Jump to: