Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1590. (Read 4670972 times)

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
We don't know a lot other people in crypto currency world, we even don't know who is Satoshi but he some-how forced people to believe in Bitcoin and nowadays Bitcoin is liquid.

Satoshi was actually around and communicating with well known people when Bitcoin was released, and he worked collaboratively with well known people to further develop the code, demonstrating obvious intimate familiarity with the code and its thereby authenticating his authorship. If I'm not mistaken a lot of his stuff was PGP signed as well.

These cryptonote people just sort of showed up after some other random guys on the BCE (Bytecoin the bitcoin clone) thread started talking about (BCN) Bytecoin. Most of their posts are extremely vague, high level in nature, and often philosophical rather than making the sort of in-depth technical points that would demonstrate any deep knowledge (the I2P post being one example).

Quote
As well as there is no point to trust them they've done nothing wrong to make us not believe in their words.

Trust must be earned, though actions and independent verification of claims, especially when anonymous people on the internet can do or claim anything they want.

Quote
They are the founders of CryptoNote tech and maybe in token of respect we'd better to listen to their words?!

If they can authenticate any of this, then sure. Otherwise it is just a bunch of guys (or maybe even just one with a bunch of puppets -- we have no idea) on a website that showed up a few months ago.

And as I said, we always listen. Even anonymous people on the internet with no verification of their claims can offer valuable input.
member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
Wouldn't it better to listen to Cryptonote academics as they have created this technology and no one knows it as well as they.

Considering we don't know who the hell they are and can't verify any of their claims or intentions, I would say no. A thousand times no.

Or at least I would say not to trust anything they say. Listen sure. We always do that.

BTW, I2P will add NAT traversal, something that doesn't exist on any other coin as far as I know beyond the limited case of UPNP. It isn't the only way to do that but it is part of that value added.





Just read your post.

We don't know a lot other people in crypto currency world, we even don't know who is Satoshi but he some-how forced people to believe in Bitcoin and nowadays Bitcoin is liquid.

As well as there is no point to trust them they've done nothing wrong to make us not believe in their words.
They are the founders of CryptoNote tech and maybe in token of respect we'd better to listen to their words?!
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
eidoo wallet
I do find it extremely odd...that the people who made cryptonote, never acknowledged themselves until other cryptonote coins were made, besides bytecoin which was premined...

And I also find it unnerving that the real bytecoin devs never even acknowlegded themselves or anything at all....what was the point of premining bytecoin then...

Anyway, thank god for Monero!
member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
What the necessity to implement i2p? I don't see the point to make this integration as well as CryptoNote dev team.
Brandon Hawking has written his thoughts about i2p on the forum - https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=205#p670

This has been discussed at length, it's to ensure that (generally speaking) an attacker can't determine if you are using Monero or not.

We're not beholden to what the CryptoNote academics believe, so whilst any input they have to offer is always appreciated, we've already diverged far from their reference code, and will continue to do so as we fix deficiencies in their protocol (some of which were highlighted in the Monero whitepaper review).

Still, I don't understand the reason to implement i2p to the coin. Wouldn't it better to listen to Cryptonote academics as they have created this technology and no one knows it as well as they.

i2p, of course, has pros but I wonder if the patterns are used above correct for their intended purposes? Does the FoxyProxy setup in any way open up for attacks?

I2P is pretty much mandatory for any anonymous coin, according to what others said(anonymint), I2P is the most important thing that ensures a coins anonymity.

It can be a true but not for CN-based coins. And it uses a lot of RAM and, furthermore, there are ways in which users can fail to secure their I2P connection.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Wouldn't it better to listen to Cryptonote academics as they have created this technology and no one knows it as well as they.

Considering we don't know who the hell they are and can't verify any of their claims or intentions, I would say no. A thousand times no.

Or at least I would say not to trust anything they say. Listen sure. We always do that.

BTW, I2P will add NAT traversal, something that doesn't exist on any other coin as far as I know beyond the limited case of UPNP. It isn't the only way to do that but it is part of that value added.



hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
What the necessity to implement i2p? I don't see the point to make this integration as well as CryptoNote dev team.
Brandon Hawking has written his thoughts about i2p on the forum - https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=205#p670

This has been discussed at length, it's to ensure that (generally speaking) an attacker can't determine if you are using Monero or not.

We're not beholden to what the CryptoNote academics believe, so whilst any input they have to offer is always appreciated, we've already diverged far from their reference code, and will continue to do so as we fix deficiencies in their protocol (some of which were highlighted in the Monero whitepaper review).

Still, I don't understand the reason to implement i2p to the coin. Wouldn't it better to listen to Cryptonote academics as they have created this technology and no one knows it as well as they.

i2p, of course, has pros but I wonder if the patterns are used above correct for their intended purposes? Does the FoxyProxy setup in any way open up for attacks?

I2P is pretty much mandatory for any anonymous coin, according to what others said(anonymint), I2P is the most important thing that ensures a coins anonymity.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
how profitable is monero mining compared to x11 algo coins mining ? i think it's a lot more profitable no ?
member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
What the necessity to implement i2p? I don't see the point to make this integration as well as CryptoNote dev team.
Brandon Hawking has written his thoughts about i2p on the forum - https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=205#p670

This has been discussed at length, it's to ensure that (generally speaking) an attacker can't determine if you are using Monero or not.

We're not beholden to what the CryptoNote academics believe, so whilst any input they have to offer is always appreciated, we've already diverged far from their reference code, and will continue to do so as we fix deficiencies in their protocol (some of which were highlighted in the Monero whitepaper review).

Still, I don't understand the reason to implement i2p to the coin. Wouldn't it better to listen to Cryptonote academics as they have created this technology and no one knows it as well as they.

i2p, of course, has pros but I wonder if the patterns are used above correct for their intended purposes? Does the FoxyProxy setup in any way open up for attacks?
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
Wanted to share this post here, (partial).

rpietila what I find very interesting about Monero is how much Bitcoin developers really like the CryptoNote concept. Take for example gmaxwell, PeterTodd, wumpus, nanotube etc.
Every name I mentioned have spoken well about XMR and currently three of the names are active in #Monero-dev.
wumpus is the leader of Bitcoin development team, he took over after Gavin and to my suprise I find him in the Monero dev channel.
I find this very interesting, because all of the guys here are really good cryptographers and have been the core bitcoin developers for years.

To see if the names here also particpate in other altcoin channels on freenode, I checked #darkcoin-dev, #darkcoin, #ethereum and #bytecoin and I could not find any of them has such a huge backing by good developers as Monero have.
For me as an investor, this give Monero huge credibility.

donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
What the necessity to implement i2p? I don't see the point to make this integration as well as CryptoNote dev team.
Brandon Hawking has written his thoughts about i2p on the forum - https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=205#p670

This has been discussed at length, it's to ensure that (generally speaking) an attacker can't determine if you are using Monero or not.

We're not beholden to what the CryptoNote academics believe, so whilst any input they have to offer is always appreciated, we've already diverged far from their reference code, and will continue to do so as we fix deficiencies in their protocol (some of which were highlighted in the Monero whitepaper review).
member
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
What the necessity to implement i2p? I don't see the point to make this integration as well as CryptoNote dev team.
Brandon Hawking has written his thoughts about i2p on the forum - https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=205#p670
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
no way i  can get just a simple gui wallet like all these other coins ?!

There are two "simple gui" wallets, but bear in mind that Monero is not "like all these other coins"Wink

From the OP:

GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.



qt gui needs to be compiled ?!

Yes, but compiling it on Mac or Linux is not really a big deal (also, you can find some compiled test versions in the GUI bounty thread). For Windows, I have all the releases tagged and compiled on GitHub, including an alpha release which utilizes rpcwallet with the new daemon.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
no way i  can get just a simple gui wallet like all these other coins ?!

There are two "simple gui" wallets, but bear in mind that Monero is not "like all these other coins"Wink

From the OP:

GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.



qt gui needs to be compiled ?!
donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
no way i  can get just a simple gui wallet like all these other coins ?!

There are two "simple gui" wallets, but bear in mind that Monero is not "like all these other coins"Wink

From the OP:

GUI
All current GUIs are in beta, but they should be fairly safe to use because they work through bitmonerod and simplewallet from the main code.

hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 1000
Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable
why installing the wallet of this coin is such a pain in the ass ?!!!

because the focus has been on back-end cryptography and anonymity, not user experience (UX)

hard to install wallet will discourage people from using it, i'm discouraged now ...

can you help me install it ?
Go to monero.cc -> getting started, or if you are using windows see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.10520 or the tutorials here: https://monerotalk.org/t/bounty-create-a-useful-tutorial-on-how-to-setup-monero-closed/13
If you still have any questions see if they are answered in the monero FAQ thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-unofficial-xmr-community-monero-faq-thread-686086 or ask it in the monero support thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/monero-support-652305
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
why installing the wallet of this coin is such a pain in the ass ?!!!

because the focus has been on back-end cryptography and anonymity, not user experience (UX)

hard to install wallet will discourage people from using it, i'm discouraged now ...

can you help me install it ?

To be honest that is a good thing for now.  We need the devs to finish the transition to a database and make some other core decisions before working on making the coin easy to use.

Hopefully they are doing this now.

Frankly, using the command line wallet is drop dead simple.

no way i  can get just a simple gui wallet like all these other coins ?!
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
why installing the wallet of this coin is such a pain in the ass ?!!!

because the focus has been on back-end cryptography and anonymity, not user experience (UX)

hard to install wallet will discourage people from using it, i'm discouraged now ...

can you help me install it ?

To be honest that is a good thing for now.  We need the devs to finish the transition to a database and make some other core decisions before working on making the coin easy to use.

Hopefully they are doing this now.

Frankly, using the command line wallet is drop dead simple.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
why installing the wallet of this coin is such a pain in the ass ?!!!

because the focus has been on back-end cryptography and anonymity, not user experience (UX)

hard to install wallet will discourage people from using it, i'm discouraged now ...

can you help me install it ?
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 105
why installing the wallet of this coin is such a pain in the ass ?!!!

because the focus has been on back-end cryptography and anonymity, not user experience (UX)
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
why installing the wallet of this coin is such a pain in the ass ?!!!
Jump to: