There are other strong teams in South America, such as Uruguay, which was twice the world champion and played in the semi-finals of the 2010 World Cup.
It is true that Europe has more quality national teams, but the main reason for this is that Europe has many more countries than South America.
And some other South American national teams were also very difficult opponents of the European national teams at the previous world championships, like Chile or Paraguay, as far as I remember.
We will see who will be more successful at this world championship in Qatar, European or South American teams
I do not believe even Brazil and Argentina, let alone Uruguay. This is why I do not think that any of them would do anything to win it. Why I believe that? I do not know if this is wrong or not, but I feel like those teams do not have the seriousness when they are playing to make this work, like they play with more talent and fun then anything else, and they lack the discipline required to be a winner of a tournament when playing with other continents.
Maybe I am wrong, but if you look at it, last time a team from South America won, was 2002 Brazil, it has been 20 years, ever since then it has been just one more finalist, and all others were European.
Be careful, you cannot underestimate the colossi, you are talking about Brazil, Argentina, and the first country that won a World Cup, which is Uruguay, do not echo what Mbappé said that they have silenced him enough, both the European and South American teams they have a high level, I think that a European player would not feel good playing in Manaus in a temperature above 42°C at noon, where the sun hits much harder and the humidity is impressive, where your head it can become as heavy as an anvil and where sweat is the drops of water that you don't want to leave your body, because that's what it feels like to run (Just run) in the Arena do Brasil (Manaus) I tell you properly because I've played there, and you know something? the Brazilians play there at that time as if they were very fresh, in fact, the one who played there was CR7 in 2014, and they had to do intervals of time to give the players hydration, because the Europeans couldn't stand much, then the stronger conditions makes stronger players.
FIFA will formally introduce the semi-automatic offside system for the Qatar 2022 World Cup. Match officials can use these tools to help them make decisions more quickly and correctly both on the field and in the video room. The success of the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) at the 2018 World Cup in Russia inspired the development of this semi-automatic offside detection device, which has since undergone trials at the Arab Cup 2021 and the Club World Cup.
To create and enhance semi-automatic offside detection technology, FIFA closely collaborates with Adidas and a number of other partners.
Interestingly referees can still make big mistakes despite having a system like VAR. We see these mistakes in some games even though not the majority of games are like this. However I still hope that this new technology will hinder big mistakes in the World Cup. Some positions can be very tricky to decide whether they are offside or not. You just need to look into them in a very detailed way. If this system doesn't have any technical problem then these positions wouldn't be evaluated wrongly as of now.
This technology will be very useful and very helpful for the referee's work on the field, and although it is assisted by great technology and also the first time for the Qatar 2022 World Cup later the final decision remains in the hands of the referee.
and semi-automated offside technology which is expected to provide additional and more accurate VAR information, as well as assist the referee's decision-making process and make the review process as efficient as possible. And I really wanted to see how it worked on the pitch because this technology is a first in football.
This type of system is much more reliable, because even so with the VAR the one who has the last voice is a human, and I think the technology is much more reliable, hopefully all kinds of assistive technology can be implemented for a referee and that Above all, it is visible to everyone, so it is much easier to detect not only a play, but it also reveals any type of corruption that the referee himself wants to do.