[ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW - page 102.

joepke

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: Iqtel on January 25, 2018, 04:17:24 AM

Quote from: nunoclix on January 25, 2018, 03:51:39 AM

Quote from: WesternCowboyBibop on January 24, 2018, 06:44:27 PM

Hi folk i register this forum for ITNS. I dont know why but I believe this coin

You probably found the best coin in the World mate.

Hello guys! I'm very excited to join mining Intensecoin! Would you please help me to figure out one thing. If I want to mine with my CPU (pool mining), they say I only need to download a wallet, synchronize it and press "mine". And how do I mine to the particular pool? How can I set that?

The pool is set when you download the wallet. And you can add another pool on the mining tab

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: korm on January 25, 2018, 06:36:31 AM

Quote from: lncm on January 25, 2018, 06:15:47 AM

With only 2 pools, too easy to have more than 51% hashrate on one of them, no? That's not secure using blockchain.

I know it. But we are now trying to earn coins. I tried on another coin pool with a small rating. Too bad a general result is obtained. luck, total efort is far from 100 percent.

On the long run all payments will be the same, on average. So I tend to prefer pools with lowest fee.

I'm mining on https://itns.west-pool.org and I'm happy.

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: sundownz on January 25, 2018, 07:23:14 AM

Quote from: SQ1 on January 25, 2018, 06:19:01 AM

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

How did you reconfigure your cpus? I'm running x5660s as well but am only getting around 175H/S

XMRIG with "large pages" enabled (in windows run program as admin then reboot system / continue to run as admin) -- otherwise nothing special in setup.

Is it faster than XMR-stak? Don't forget XMRig has dev fee, XMR-stak can be 0 if you compile it yourself.

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: sundownz on January 25, 2018, 07:22:25 AM

Quote from: lncm on January 25, 2018, 06:31:39 AM

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

Do you get better performance with 5 threads rather than 6? With 12 Mb cache, I run 6 threads on mine.

I use 5 as I also GPU mine on all those systems and I want to leave some resources for that. Using all six slows the GPU miner.

Interesting. I don't see that with mine, and I do GPU mining at the same time as well.

sundownz

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 512

Quote from: SQ1 on January 25, 2018, 06:19:01 AM

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

How did you reconfigure your cpus? I'm running x5660s as well but am only getting around 175H/S

XMRIG with "large pages" enabled (in windows run program as admin then reboot system / continue to run as admin) -- otherwise nothing special in setup.

sundownz

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 512

Quote from: lncm on January 25, 2018, 06:31:39 AM

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

Do you get better performance with 5 threads rather than 6? With 12 Mb cache, I run 6 threads on mine.

I use 5 as I also GPU mine on all those systems and I want to leave some resources for that. Using all six slows the GPU miner.

korm

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 10

Quote from: lncm on January 25, 2018, 06:15:47 AM

With only 2 pools, too easy to have more than 51% hashrate on one of them, no? That's not secure using blockchain.

I know it. But we are now trying to earn coins. I tried on another coin pool with a small rating. Too bad a general result is obtained. luck, total efort is far from 100 percent.

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: SQ1 on January 25, 2018, 06:19:01 AM

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

How did you reconfigure your cpus? I'm running x5660s as well but am only getting around 175H/S

What mining program do you use?

With XMR-Stack I get 200 with my E5645 (westmere EP 6 cores, 2.4 Ghz).

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

Do you get better performance with 5 threads rather than 6? With 12 Mb cache, I run 6 threads on mine.

SQ1

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Quote from: sundownz on January 24, 2018, 03:26:34 PM

Quote from: lncm on January 24, 2018, 02:29:58 PM

Quote from: sundownz on January 23, 2018, 09:56:47 PM

Older Quad-CPU servers seem to be a "goldmine" right now with GPU shortage and popularity of Cryptonight coins like ITNS.

Even so, older CPU's aren't particularly efficient with cryptonight.

I have an old Intel Xeon E5645 6 core (85W TDP) in my secondary machine and it struggles with 200 H/s with 6 threads. And it should excel with its 12 Mb of cache.

My laptop has a tiny core i7 7500u (15W TDP) and it does 130 H/s with 2 threads...

I also run a ton of older Xeons... they do plenty well for being cheap as they are (get your money back in a month). I mainly use X5660 models on 5 threads... about 230 H/S

Of course more modern CPUs are more efficient but they are pricey.

How did you reconfigure your cpus? I'm running x5660s as well but am only getting around 175H/S

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: korm on January 25, 2018, 05:27:19 AM

I do not understand why to make a new pool. Two large pools - hashvault and official. They have the largest Hs. Regular payments. What's the point of trying to find a block with a few KHs.
Yes, centralization is bad, but at this stage it is not so important.

With only 2 pools, too easy to have more than 51% hashrate on one of them, no? That's not secure using blockchain.

nunoclix

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 100

Quote from: lncm on January 25, 2018, 04:55:33 AM

Quote from: nunoclix on January 25, 2018, 03:51:39 AM

Quote from: WesternCowboyBibop on January 24, 2018, 06:44:27 PM

Hi folk i register this forum for ITNS. I dont know why but I believe this coin

You probably found the best coin in the World mate.

Benficaaaaa! Grin

ah ah ah oh yeahhh, ITNS is like our Benfica, is the best for sure

korm

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 10

I do not understand why to make a new pool. Two large pools - hashvault and official. They have the largest Hs. Regular payments. What's the point of trying to find a block with a few KHs.
Yes, centralization is bad, but at this stage it is not so important.

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

Quote from: nunoclix on January 25, 2018, 03:51:39 AM

Quote from: WesternCowboyBibop on January 24, 2018, 06:44:27 PM

Hi folk i register this forum for ITNS. I dont know why but I believe this coin

You probably found the best coin in the World mate.

Benficaaaaa! Grin

Iqtel

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: nunoclix on January 25, 2018, 03:51:39 AM

Quote from: WesternCowboyBibop on January 24, 2018, 06:44:27 PM

Hi folk i register this forum for ITNS. I dont know why but I believe this coin

You probably found the best coin in the World mate.

Hello guys! I'm very excited to join mining Intensecoin! Would you please help me to figure out one thing. If I want to mine with my CPU (pool mining), they say I only need to download a wallet, synchronize it and press "mine". And how do I mine to the particular pool? How can I set that?

nunoclix

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 100

Quote from: WesternCowboyBibop on January 24, 2018, 06:44:27 PM

Hi folk i register this forum for ITNS. I dont know why but I believe this coin

You probably found the best coin in the World mate.

ronnylov

member

Activity: 276

Merit: 13

As a complement I think a decentralized Exchange would make it easier to buy ITNS in countries where crypto trading on normal Exchanges is blocked. If you want to anonymously buy VPN you first may want to anonymously buy intense coins. You can mine some with your CPU to get VPN access to be able to buy more. I quess there will be decentralized ways to exchange fiat to crypto.

osnwt

sr. member

Activity: 353

Merit: 251

Did you consider bleutrade.com?

I would be happy to see ITNS there. One of selling points for me is that it is supported (as one of ~20 only exchanges) by TabTrader Android app to trade on the go. It should not demand so much for the listing like Cryptopia does. Unsure, though, if they support XMR-like coins...

Ayers

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 1022

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

when this on a bigger exchange please? we need cryptopia

cptnsteve

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: cptnsteve on January 23, 2018, 07:43:20 PM

I added an Intense Mining Pool to our servers yesterday. Difficulty on the coin is still good for mining to a small tool. Obviously being new we have a low hash rate right now. It also means that having few miners you'll get a bigger cut on this pool in the early stages. So if you want to check it out we would appreciate the help. I'm dropping the pool fee to just 0.5% while we get started.

http://intense.cryptocoinminingco.com

if you have any questions please feel free to email me at [email protected]

Thanks!

Steve

tweaked the settings on our pool. Dropped it to .5% fee on the pool while we get working on our first block. We also have it setup so we are not sending much traffic there now so that our miners will get the bulk of the block rewards. We are setup to do payments every 10 minutes as well with a low payment minimum of only 10 IC.

We have also setup Karbo and Fonero pools and have sent a little traffic to each of those as well.

Topic: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW - page 102. (Read 235822 times)