[ANN] Maieuticoin | 2014% PoS | 10k/MMXIV and BALLS/MMXIV Markets NOW OPEN - page 75.

d2dtk

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 501

Quote from: chilly2k on November 19, 2014, 05:17:29 PM

I don't know if it was intentional or not, but the new client code, installed a new wallet.dat file. Luckily I just backed that up yesterday. If that was the intended install sequence a BIG warning should be made.

Yea, I know you should always backup your wallets. And I do, but I haven't had a client update change my wallet.dat. So that's a big warning sign.

It worked for me just fine when I downloaded and opened it. Pretty much picked up where the old client was without re-indexing.

chilly2k

legendary

Activity: 1007

Merit: 1000

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 19, 2014, 05:22:00 PM

Quote from: chilly2k on November 19, 2014, 05:17:29 PM

I don't know if it was intentional or not, but the new client code, installed a new wallet.dat file. Luckily I just backed that up yesterday. If that was the intended install sequence a BIG warning should be made.

Yea, I know you should always backup your wallets. And I do, but I haven't had a client update change my wallet.dat. So that's a big warning sign.

That would not happen unless you did not have a file named wallet.dat in the roaming folder

I had the old 1.0.3 code running. Downloaded the new client, installed (un-rar'ed) it to a new folder, stopped the old wallet, and started up the new one. Waited about 4 hours for it to re-download the blockchain. I was assuming it was re-syncing. The new wallet had a balance of 0. Copied my old wallet back-up over and now all is good.

Can't be a different folder in the roaming directory, because I had a backup folder hung off that folder, and it was still there. Not sure what happened.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: chilly2k on November 19, 2014, 05:17:29 PM

I don't know if it was intentional or not, but the new client code, installed a new wallet.dat file. Luckily I just backed that up yesterday. If that was the intended install sequence a BIG warning should be made.

Yea, I know you should always backup your wallets. And I do, but I haven't had a client update change my wallet.dat. So that's a big warning sign.

That would not happen unless you did not have a file named wallet.dat in the roaming folder

chilly2k

legendary

Activity: 1007

Merit: 1000

I don't know if it was intentional or not, but the new client code, installed a new wallet.dat file. Luckily I just backed that up yesterday. If that was the intended install sequence a BIG warning should be made.

Yea, I know you should always backup your wallets. And I do, but I haven't had a client update change my wallet.dat. So that's a big warning sign.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: Karn on November 19, 2014, 10:58:43 AM

I have a problem with Transaction ID: f54312fb9a34beac8e54a0d19b7b00d1bc5a6e9e73d1b728d1c7ddadc201ff1a
sent it on 11/16 still showing unconfirmed in my wallet, confirmations go up to 4 then back to 0. What did I do and how can I fix it lol

repwairwallet

Karn

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."

I have a problem with Transaction ID: f54312fb9a34beac8e54a0d19b7b00d1bc5a6e9e73d1b728d1c7ddadc201ff1a
sent it on 11/16 still showing unconfirmed in my wallet, confirmations go up to 4 then back to 0. What did I do and how can I fix it lol

Cor2

hero member

Activity: 595

Merit: 500

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 19, 2014, 02:55:20 AM

It won't be delisted

Good to hear that.
Earlier today I have sent a request to them to wait with de-listing due to new developments for this coin, which will cause new traffic, but that might take a week before it shows in the average, so that it would be good to wait.
Now you already have taken care of this, so that is good. Thanks.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: Cor2 on November 19, 2014, 02:54:27 AM

Quote from: I Aint Stifler on November 18, 2014, 11:13:22 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 16, 2014, 11:52:17 PM

Even if it gets delisted from Bittrex, it doesn't matter. It's still on Poloniex anyway

You need to check the volume of M on poloniex, the last trade happened on 16th and before that 10 days ago. M getting delisted from bittrex means killing a dead coin again. The only thing you can do right now is prevent it from getting delisted from bittrex . All you have to do is put a sell wall and buy into your own sell wall, which would generate trade volume and cause you no loss.

There still is traffic on BitTrex, but they are *very* quick with de-listing - I experienced that with another coin that is far from dead,
in fact the coin was a year old before it got listed and they have de-listed it, but it has not affected the value or the traffic on the other exchanges...

It won't be delisted

Cor2

hero member

Activity: 595

Merit: 500

Quote from: I Aint Stifler on November 18, 2014, 11:13:22 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 16, 2014, 11:52:17 PM

Even if it gets delisted from Bittrex, it doesn't matter. It's still on Poloniex anyway

You need to check the volume of M on poloniex, the last trade happened on 16th and before that 10 days ago. M getting delisted from bittrex means killing a dead coin again. The only thing you can do right now is prevent it from getting delisted from bittrex . All you have to do is put a sell wall and buy into your own sell wall, which would generate trade volume and cause you no loss.

There still is traffic on BitTrex, but they are *very* quick with de-listing - I experienced that with another coin that is far from dead,
in fact the coin was a year old before it got listed and they have de-listed it, but it has not affected the value or the traffic on the other exchanges...

Cor2

hero member

Activity: 595

Merit: 500

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 19, 2014, 02:35:59 AM

Many changes in this client. At block 80,000, Maieuticoin will fork to a much higher yearly yield from staking. This change will take effect immediately after block 80,000. This will also be, barring any security threats, the final mandatory update to Maieuticoin's base parameters. Any updates from here forward will be responsive in nature to security risks or optional GUI and feature upgrades

Great news! I am looking forward to that and buying more MMXIV

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Maieuticoin 1.0.8

Many changes in this client. At block 80,000, Maieuticoin will fork to a much higher yearly yield from staking. This change will take effect immediately after block 80,000. This will also be, barring any security threats, the final mandatory update to Maieuticoin's base parameters. Any updates from here forward will be responsive in nature to security risks or optional GUI and feature upgrades

Important updates at block 80,000 include:

The MMXIV Ticker has returned! We found a creative way to incorporate it back into the coin
Yearly staking yield increased to 2014%. The previous rate of 50% was below market average
Peers that do not update prior to the hard fork will all become rejected nodes after block 80,000
If you were previously using 1.0.3, the client will automatically reindex the blockchain on first load
We were unimpressed with 1.0.3; increased orphans with coin control lacking utility. That being said...
Coin control has been removed for the current build, but will come back with more features very soon

We are very excited about this update. Maieuticoin now runs with a very lightweight, easily modifiable source code and GUI clients. This fork could not come at a better time. The Snowball staking hardware is about to ship and will include this version of Maieuticoin upon arrival. You will be quickly set up, ready to deposit, and start staking in minutes!

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Windows is up, will be on github shortly

I Aint Stifler

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 16, 2014, 11:52:17 PM

Even if it gets delisted from Bittrex, it doesn't matter. It's still on Poloniex anyway

You need to check the volume of M on poloniex, the last trade happened on 16th and before that 10 days ago. M getting delisted from bittrex means killing a dead coin again. The only thing you can do right now is prevent it from getting delisted from bittrex . All you have to do is put a sell wall and buy into your own sell wall, which would generate trade volume and cause you no loss.

Phosphorous

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 500

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 04:50:34 PM

We are aware of that UI issue, but getinfo will always be accurate. Still not sure where the hiccup is in the display, though

Why don't you call getinfo() for the display if getinfo is always accurate?

I don't like the idea of being diluted as such a rate, I like it how it is now.

It seems like this is just your little toy. Every few days you wake up and ask, "what should I do to M coin today? Change the name? change the staking? how about another fork?" Would be nice to see an overall plan and strategy that is stuck to and executed.

Mortimer452

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:59:16 PM

Quote from: chilly2k on November 17, 2014, 03:54:02 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:45:01 PM

There will be a hard fork soon that will adjust yearly yield from staking

I'm assuming your talking about Maieuticoin? What is the reason for changing the yearly yield?

Yes, there is no more merge. The reason is because the coin is dying at 50% and rather than stand on the principle of keeping it rare, I would prefer if the M holders have a chance to not hold a dead coin

I'm all for anything to bring some more attention to M, but I wouldn't get too crazy with the POS rate unless fees are increased as well to offset new coins created by staking. I kinda like the idea of a low coin supply.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: chilly2k on November 17, 2014, 04:15:28 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:59:16 PM

Quote from: chilly2k on November 17, 2014, 03:54:02 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:45:01 PM

There will be a hard fork soon that will adjust yearly yield from staking

I'm assuming your talking about Maieuticoin? What is the reason for changing the yearly yield?

Yes, there is no more merge. The reason is because the coin is dying at 50% and rather than stand on the principle of keeping it rare, I would prefer if the M holders have a chance to not hold a dead coin

So this will be an increase in yield? Personally I liked it how it is. Maybe a little more/better advertising.... But since the total coin supply is so low, your community is going to be small, and that results in less chatter. Catch22... Coin control would have been nice.

Also, since your putting out a change anyway, is there anyway to fix the wallet so it shows the first block getting staked? Both M and Snowball have this problem. First block to stake doesn't show in the Stake: total on the main wallet window. When you have 2 staking the second will show. And once your all done staking the total is correct.

Yes, it will increase. Version 1.0.3 already has coin control

We are aware of that UI issue, but getinfo will always be accurate. Still not sure where the hiccup is in the display, though

chilly2k

legendary

Activity: 1007

Merit: 1000

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:59:16 PM

Quote from: chilly2k on November 17, 2014, 03:54:02 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:45:01 PM

There will be a hard fork soon that will adjust yearly yield from staking

I'm assuming your talking about Maieuticoin? What is the reason for changing the yearly yield?

Yes, there is no more merge. The reason is because the coin is dying at 50% and rather than stand on the principle of keeping it rare, I would prefer if the M holders have a chance to not hold a dead coin

So this will be an increase in yield? Personally I liked it how it is. Maybe a little more/better advertising.... But since the total coin supply is so low, your community is going to be small, and that results in less chatter. Catch22... Coin control would have been nice.

Also, since your putting out a change anyway, is there anyway to fix the wallet so it shows the first block getting staked? Both M and Snowball have this problem. First block to stake doesn't show in the Stake: total on the main wallet window. When you have 2 staking the second will show. And once your all done staking the total is correct.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: chilly2k on November 17, 2014, 03:54:02 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:45:01 PM

There will be a hard fork soon that will adjust yearly yield from staking

I'm assuming your talking about Maieuticoin? What is the reason for changing the yearly yield?

Yes, there is no more merge. The reason is because the coin is dying at 50% and rather than stand on the principle of keeping it rare, I would prefer if the M holders have a chance to not hold a dead coin

chilly2k

legendary

Activity: 1007

Merit: 1000

Quote from: iGotSpots on November 17, 2014, 03:45:01 PM

There will be a hard fork soon that will adjust yearly yield from staking

I'm assuming your talking about Maieuticoin? What is the reason for changing the yearly yield?

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

There will be a hard fork soon that will adjust yearly yield from staking

Topic: [ANN] Maieuticoin | 2014% PoS | 10k/MMXIV and BALLS/MMXIV Markets NOW OPEN - page 75. (Read 283116 times)