Since the dev is not responding and probably too busy with his next coin and even after searching and asking, I did not get answers, I think the next best thing is to sell my coins as I originally bought them on the announcement of a coin swap but that has since been cancelled and replaced by an insta-mine. As you can tell, I am not happy.
I wasn't ignoring anyone, I was banned for posting about the staking hardware we are selling because mprep is a
Ah, thanks for clearing that up, this explains why I got no response.
We have not put in fancy limiters to the staking like a lot of coins. Personally, I move mine once a month spread across several addresses. This is not for me to make the most, but to ensure blocks keep moving. I would not take someone else's advice on how to stake my own coins, so I won't offer my own personal suggestion
But I was explicitly looking for your opinion on optimization, because there is no way that I can know about limitations such as minimum weights needed for staking, maximum weight that can be accumulated, max rewards or simply whether the wallet continues to divide the inputs up further and further, creating dust or - as so many other wallets - occasionally re-combines all staking-elegible inputs into one large input again, "sweeping up the dust" so to say. For example SYNC will do this once inputs have divided down to reach 0.01 SYNC.
Your method is earning you 56% yearly, which is higher than estimated returns; stick to what you're doing. But you probably sold them already since my being banned meant I was ignoring you personally, so this post is probably in vain anyway
not at all, only it does not answer most of my questions ;-)
The fact that the *first* stake is going well, does not guarantee continued success, because the value of the inputs are changing with every time staking...
Fees are calculated by transaction size, not coin amount, as they are with every coin ever. I will look at changing the popup box dialog, but if that is your main concern, and think small UI issues like that, deserve our attention above everything else we have going on, you're going to be disappointed
I can live with inconsistencies, just wanted to report to you and add to the known bug list so it can be patched in one of the future releases if you so feel inclined. Good to know that fees only depend on size of the transaction - so unless you have many small inputs in your wallet, you can transfer for a low fee - another reason to keep the nr of inputs down. Is the wallet at some point limiting dividing the output of the staking when the amounts get very small?