Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 254. (Read 554387 times)
February 21, 2014, 12:13:50 PM
Asia server, hurray..
February 21, 2014, 11:48:25 AM
Rejects at 11% been mining for a day. That isn't soo bad but that takes away quite a bit of profit in the long run
February 21, 2014, 11:37:05 AM
This is just a small improvement request.. not as important as servers or anything.
On the website, can you enable each user to choose their preferred time zone? Just wondering.
Thanks either way... I'm liking your pool thus far.
On the website, can you enable each user to choose their preferred time zone? Just wondering.
Thanks either way... I'm liking your pool thus far.
February 21, 2014, 11:26:19 AM
Who knows who to talk to if I was missing a couple of letters when I started on this pool. Changed to correct address but I have other coins just siting in the wrong address/user I need them moved or deposited to correct bitcoin address.
That would be Terk. as far as i know he's single-handedly running this whole thing.
February 21, 2014, 11:19:15 AM
Who knows who to talk to if I was missing a couple of letters when I started on this pool. Changed to correct address but I have other coins just siting in the wrong address/user I need them moved or deposited to correct bitcoin address.
February 21, 2014, 10:56:31 AM
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
Nice, rejectrates here are growing, hope you can finish the extra servers this weekend.
February 21, 2014, 10:24:22 AM
Thanks for answering my question. This is very helpful .
February 21, 2014, 10:19:30 AM
same username for all rigs.
i've often wondered if this has hampered Reject rates for some people. i have a main mining rig but a few smaller CPU mining rigs just for shits and giggles. how does the system discern which is sending which jobs?
i've often wondered if this has hampered Reject rates for some people. i have a main mining rig but a few smaller CPU mining rigs just for shits and giggles. how does the system discern which is sending which jobs?
February 21, 2014, 10:16:59 AM
If I have more than one rig, do I just use the same username for each (ie my bitcoin address), or do I need to put .1, .2, .3 etc after each. Or generate a new bitcoin address even?
February 21, 2014, 10:15:50 AM
Daily income for the pool is £22K..
Terk might have to give up his day job soon!!
Terk might have to give up his day job soon!!
February 21, 2014, 10:15:22 AM
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!
Terk you sir are a star
Hurray, because my ping is over 200ms From EU and rejects 10-20% ...
February 21, 2014, 09:57:20 AM
Terk, I have a request regarding the individual user stats page. Can you please truncate the Recent Payouts list? After two weeks of being on the server, the list has grown rather long. Maybe create three tabs: 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days? Anything past that don't bother keeping as it'll just clog up server space.
I've also taken the time to fine tune all my cards with xintensity and the latest sgminer in order to obtain an optimum balance with the server. I have my reject ratios nearly inline with the pool's rejects, minus about 2%. The profits have increased for me by doing that, so I'm happy.
I have noticed one rather strange issue after the last update, however. I'm seeing "Rejected untracked stratum share from Pool 0" now about every few minutes on every single card. Any idea why?
I've also taken the time to fine tune all my cards with xintensity and the latest sgminer in order to obtain an optimum balance with the server. I have my reject ratios nearly inline with the pool's rejects, minus about 2%. The profits have increased for me by doing that, so I'm happy.
I have noticed one rather strange issue after the last update, however. I'm seeing "Rejected untracked stratum share from Pool 0" now about every few minutes on every single card. Any idea why?
February 21, 2014, 09:17:13 AM
Can someone explain to me how CleverMining is getting so many rejects considering its hash power has gone up significantly? Its a problem with Terks code it seems. Considering Waffle had 1GH last week and there was amost less than 1% of rejects. I am tired of seeing the phrase its normal, its not.
I am tired of seeing people like you criticizing something you don't even understand!
IT IS NORMAL. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HASHPOWER. It switches coins quickly, and mines very quick coins, so a higher reject rate IS PERFECTLY NORMAL!
I want to know whether Terks profitability % is based on hashes WITH rejection or % of hash before the rejection.
Feel free to change the pool or stop blaming the admin
Many times he mention that he's working to fix those reject %Compared to other pools - clevermining has only one diff - 512 regardless of your speed or diff of mined coin. Waffle has varrdiff - IMO that is the reason for "high" reject %
simple math:
- clever - for 1 min you are accepting 20 shares with diff 512. If 1 of them is rejected, this is a 5% (due to switching and etc)
- Waffle - for 1 min you are accepting 200 shares with vardiff 8-512 (often 32-128 due to mining coins with low diff). If 1 of them is rejected, this is a 0.5%
p.s. This is my opinion, i dont want to engage with it no one, and high profit confirms this
Sigh. Difficulty has nothing to do with reject %. It's not simple math, it's faulty logic. If only 1 out of 200 shares is rejected, that makes the probability 0.5%. If you increase the difficulty and only submit 1/10th of the shares in the same period of time, that means it's 10 times less likely that one of them is submitted at the exact moment when the coin switch/stale block occurs. You'd have to go through the same scenario 10 times to randomly get that 1 reject. The percentage doesn't change.
It's like shooting bullets in random directions and hoping that one hits the bullseye. 1/10th of the bullets = 1/10th of the chance to hit. The only thing that matters is the size of the bullseye, i.e. the combination of latency to the server, intensity setting and block speed.
And just for you I'm currently mining on Wafflepool with d=1024, and guess what? Same reject rate as with d=256.
February 21, 2014, 09:15:15 AM
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!
Terk you sir are a star
February 21, 2014, 09:12:14 AM
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
I do wish Terk would take down that announcement that the Rejects issue is resolved. It clearly is not!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ffcjzvxo1r3ufjvo1_500.jpg
February 21, 2014, 09:10:33 AM
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
cool! but do you mean they will autobalance or should I manually point my miners to the closest one? I do wish Terk would take down that announcement that the Rejects issue is resolved. It clearly is not!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
February 21, 2014, 09:07:18 AM
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
I do wish Terk would take down that announcement that the Rejects issue is resolved. It clearly is not!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it.
February 21, 2014, 08:55:27 AM
what are your pings? am at 100ms getting between 11% to 20% rejects, located in canada btw
February 21, 2014, 08:28:07 AM
I have been mining for 24 hours, and I'm at 6.6% reject. I'm completely fine with that.
February 21, 2014, 07:43:48 AM
thanks for replying but I'm on windows.
Solution as per my post.
Reject rate is 3.57% after 3hrs mining.
Solution as per my post.
Reject rate is 3.57% after 3hrs mining.
Jump to: